by Chaney » 29 Sep 2010 15:53
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:06
Hoop BlahWoodcote Royal By general consensus, Ipswich were the best side we have faced this season. By general consensus, they will be in the mix at the end of the season and whilst, IMHO, neither side deserved to lose, we were the ones who went home with all three 3pts.
I worry for who those failed to enjoy a tactical battle between 2 good sides..............................the Championship close to it's best, in my view.
I thought it was an intruiging game, and enjoyed it for what it was. That doesn't mean there was a lot of good entertaining and high quality football on view.Woodcote Royal Like others, I said Pearce would have to play well for us to win and, in fact, I would not have picked him, but he had one of his best ever games for RFC. That's why we should all be beside ourselves with joy at having Brian McDermott as our manager.
Who the hell who would you have played instead then?
I've supported Pearce at times, but I still accept he is a limited player. In the right side, asked to do the right job, he can get by in this division but he's not going to set the world alight.Woodcote Royal Add to the mix his astute signings such as Harte (inevitably slagged when signed by those who had never seen him kick a ball) and other products from our academy such as MoM Jem Karacan (yes, at long last, Sidwell has been replaced!!!) whom he has given the time and space to flourish, and assertions that mere survival is all we can hope for are looking more ridiculous by the day.
Sidwells been replaced? It was one good game, a one that was an attritional battle and not a game where technique was going to be required.
According to some we didn't need to replace Sidwell in the first place, Gunnarsson already did that before he left right?Woodcote Royal From what I saw last night, we are one or two signings away from making QPR look over their shoulder. Bring it on.
Not sure I'd go quite that far, but I do agree we're not a million miles away from been a good team in this division. That says as much for the division as it does our squad of players though.
It's frustrating that we're so close yet, in my view, so far from being right up there!
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2010 16:14
Nothing that has happened since then has changed my view..............................including that we paid a heavy price for Coppell refusing to spend his budget.
by WoodleyRoyal » 29 Sep 2010 16:15
royal-biscuit-man Good game. Annoying kids nearish the back of Y24, where is there parents honestly?
by Z175 » 29 Sep 2010 16:16
by Dan - B15 Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:17
Svlad Cjelli 'Greed but the best player of the night was the Ipswich number 2 - he was simply outstanding!
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:18
brendywendyNothing that has happened since then has changed my view..............................including that we paid a heavy price for Coppell refusing to spend his budget.
apart from record bids for Fae, scott brown, and john mensah?
by Hoop Blah » 29 Sep 2010 16:24
by Svlad Cjelli » 29 Sep 2010 16:27
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2010 16:27
Woodcote RoyalbrendywendyNothing that has happened since then has changed my view..............................including that we paid a heavy price for Coppell refusing to spend his budget.
apart from record bids for Fae, scott brown, and john mensah?
Like every other club we had bids turned down. We also had deals lined up that he elected not to go through with. Replacing a moderately talented water carrier who has been largely anonymous since the day he left us should have been child's play
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:35
Svlad Cjelli When he says "moderately talented water carrier who has been largely anonymous since the day he left us" I don't know if he's talking about Sidwell or Harper, tbh.
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:37
Hoop Blah So you would've picked Pearce then?
You just confused me by saying you wouldn't pick him!
I know you've got a 4 year bee in your bonnet about Sidwell, but Karacan now isn't near to being as good as Sidwell was when we first signed him as a player at a very similar age to Jem. That doesn't mean Jem can't be a decent player at this level.
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2010 16:40
by TFF » 29 Sep 2010 16:40
LoyalRoyalFan Decent performance. Thought our defence was outstanding, especially in the last few minutes with Harte and Pearce playing centre-back.
by Hoop Blah » 29 Sep 2010 16:45
Woodcote RoyalHoop Blah So you would've picked Pearce then?
You just confused me by saying you wouldn't pick him!
I know you've got a 4 year bee in your bonnet about Sidwell, but Karacan now isn't near to being as good as Sidwell was when we first signed him as a player at a very similar age to Jem. That doesn't mean Jem can't be a decent player at this level.
Would have picked Harte over Pearce had we had the cover in midfield and there was pre-match doubt over Bryn's fitness
by RoyalBlue » 29 Sep 2010 16:46
brendywendyWoodcote Royalbrendywendy apart from record bids for Fae, scott brown, and john mensah?
Like every other club we had bids turned down. We also had deals lined up that he elected not to go through with. Replacing a moderately talented water carrier who has been largely anonymous since the day he left us should have been child's play
just saying he didnt refuse to pay money to replace sidders as you said, he tried very hard to- and the two players bid for before fae would have done enough to keep us up easily imo.
the only gripe should be that coppell wouldnt spend record cash on his 2nd/3rd choices, and imo thats also fair enough
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:51
brendywendy just saying he didnt refuse to pay money to replace sidders as you said, he tried very hard to- and the two players bid for before fae would have done enough to keep us up easily imo.the only gripe should be that coppell wouldnt spend record cash on his 2nd/3rd choices, and imo thats also fair enough
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:54
brendywendy but pearce had a truly impressive game vs one of the better strikers in teh division in scotland.
and hartes not been caught out massively at FB in any of his 4 clean sheet games.
by Woodcote Royal » 29 Sep 2010 16:57
RoyalBlue Perhaps it's also accurate to say that the Chairman tried very hard not to spend too much money replacing Sidwell. Afterall, he and you both know too well that money talks. Bid enough and your bid will not be turned down, as Hoffenheim recently demonstrated! Maybe Coppell was never given enough money to stand any real chance of a successful bid.
by Royal With Cheese » 29 Sep 2010 17:25
Royal LadyRoyal With CheeseMaguire Which one was the number 2 btw? The left back?
Yes. He was awsome. Kebe wasn't fully fit but the number 2 (Peters I think his name is) had him sussed from the outset, never gave him any time on the ball and timed tackles perfectly. Not short of pace either. Preimership bound on that display.
RwC - you were there??!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], From Despair To Where?, Majestic-12 [Bot], Royal_jimmy, WestYorksRoyal and 540 guests