Reading F.C. against homophobia apparently.

[Ian Royal]

Life must be so much easier as a stupid bigot.

[sandman]

Some people just aren't as 'cosmopolitan' or as 'educated' as others.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcB0YAyFlyg

[Extended-Phenotype]

I think even Floyd would be lost for words on that one.

Reality can ge you that way!

Your reality is an abortion of reason unfit for even the most primate of ages. Your post reads like it is was written by a man with whom pets were his only sexual encounters.

I wonder how good you lot are at sport.

[Pepe the Horseman]

Fact:- A homosexual male with extreme sporting skills MAY not excel at his chosen profession as much as a heterosexual male with the same skills might.

Fact:- A Lesbian with extreme sporting skills WILL beat a heterosexual female with the same skills every time (except for the occasional freak of nature).

In terms of Football, Rugby, Tennis etc. a women's team should consist of heterosexual women (if sufficient bodies are available). This is a fair playing-field. Particularly in Tennis, there should be a Lesbian circuit and Lesbians should not compete against Ladies. This would be a fair playing field. It would also have put a lot of the most recent female
Grand-slam winners back into the obscurity that they deserve. Effectively they have cheated the 'Ladies' circuit to gain sporting immortality And vast sums of cash when they did'nt deserve it.

For Old people like me, the definition of a Lady does not include 'wearing a gumshield and playing Rugby' Perhaps I'm luckier than some of you younger ones!

p.s. England Ladies Football Captain a Lesbian Shock - NO!

How old are you out of interest?

[TFF]

Fact:- A homosexual male with extreme sporting skills MAY not excel at his chosen profession as much as a heterosexual male with the same skills might.

Fact:- A Lesbian with extreme sporting skills WILL beat a heterosexual female with the same skills every time (except for the occasional freak of nature).

In terms of Football, Rugby, Tennis etc. a women's team should consist of heterosexual women (if sufficient bodies are available). This is a fair playing-field. Particularly in Tennis, there should be a Lesbian circuit and Lesbians should not compete against Ladies. This would be a fair playing field. It would also have put a lot of the most recent female
Grand-slam winners back into the obscurity that they deserve. Effectively they have cheated the 'Ladies' circuit to gain sporting immortality And vast sums of cash when they did'nt deserve it.

For Old people like me, the definition of a Lady does not include 'wearing a gumshield and playing Rugby' Perhaps I'm luckier than some of you younger ones!

p.s. England Ladies Football Captain a Lesbian Shock - NO!

Bloody hell.

This isn't a serious post is it?

[Extended-Phenotype]

Fact:- A homosexual male with extreme sporting skills MAY not excel at his chosen profession as much as a heterosexual male with the same skills might.

Fact:- A Lesbian with extreme sporting skills WILL beat a heterosexual female with the same skills every time (except for the occasional freak of nature).

In terms of Football, Rugby, Tennis etc. a women's team should consist of heterosexual women (if sufficient bodies are available). This is a fair playing-field. Particularly in Tennis, there should be a Lesbian circuit and Lesbians should not compete against Ladies. This would be a fair playing field. It would also have put a lot of the most recent female
Grand-slam winners back into the obscurity that they deserve. Effectively they have cheated the 'Ladies' circuit to gain sporting immortality And vast sums of cash when they did'nt deserve it.

For Old people like me, the definition of a Lady does not include 'wearing a gumshield and playing Rugby' Perhaps I'm luckier than some of you younger ones!

p.s. England Ladies Football Captain a Lesbian Shock - NO!

How old are you out of interest?

He was brought up by wild pigs in the wilderness, so I doubt he has a birth certificate to accurately assess. Maybe we could look at his teeth.

[sandman]

If he has any.

[P!ssed Off]

The guy is a troll.
Probably believes 0% of the shit he actually writes.
Just ignore him.

[floyd__streete]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26160126

FootbaLOLLOLeROFLs. The rest of society largely know how to behave as decent human beings, yet our poor old rich chav-scum athletes need a classroom scenario to learn that it isn't ok to call someone a 'poof'

[BR2]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26160126

FootbaLOLLOLeROFLs. The rest of society largely know how to behave as decent human beings, yet our poor old rich chav-scum athletes need a classroom scenario to learn that it isn't ok to call someone a 'poof'

Perhaps more focus should be placed on education in general so that their "banter" doesn't include racism or sexism.
I remember thinking how dreadful it must be on long coach journeys with people like Merson, Andy Cole, Ashley Cole or Beckham and even more being holed up for a month or so at tournaments with thickos such as these.
Can you start to imagine what they talk about once you get past the (perfectly acceptable) conversation about birds?
Clothes, watches, hair,tattoos, holidays........................................................or maybe "what do you want to be when you grow up?"

[Royal Biscuitman]

Fact:- A homosexual male with extreme sporting skills MAY not excel at his chosen profession as much as a heterosexual male with the same skills might.

what if his chosen profession is flower arranging or hairdressing? (I'm not being serious).

He may have a point, If you think of reasons for a homosexual male mot exceling as much as a hetrosexual male:
- Prejudicial behaviour by coaches/managers
- Pressure of additional abuse received from the public, teammates, fans
- Attitudes/government policy (e.g. Russia)

In all cases, not the fault of the homosexual male.... If you go back in time, the same could have been said for black players in the UK or Women.

[Royal Biscuitman]

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/26160126

Thomas Hitzlsperger retired before he revealed he was gay in January

Failed New Years resolution I assume, maybe next year he'll last longer.

[Pseud O'Nym]

I wonder how good you lot are at sport.

Excellent due to the highly developed Macho Heel, evolved over many years of running away from reality.

[soggy biscuit]

holed up

good use of 'holed up'

[FridaysGhost]

Life must be so much easier as a stupid bigot.

There are a few on Hobnob, ask them! But choose the real bigots - not the realists who tell a truth that you choose to run away from!.

[FridaysGhost]

Fact:- A homosexual male with extreme sporting skills MAY not excel at his chosen profession as much as a heterosexual male with the same skills might.

what if his chosen profession is flower arranging or hairdressing? (I'm not being serious).

He may have a point, If you think of reasons for a homosexual male mot exceling as much as a hetrosexual male:
- Prejudicial behaviour by coaches/managers
- Pressure of additional abuse received from the public, teammates, fans
- Attitudes/government policy (e.g. Russia)

In all cases, not the fault of the homosexual male.... If you go back in time, the same could have been said for black players in the UK or Women.

Just check the Winners and top seeds of Womens Tennis over the last thirty to forty years. I do have a point and it has nothing to do with discrimination against Male Players. A homosexual male has a 'feminised' brain, a Lesbian athlete has a 'masculinised' brain. Different-gender males will do less well at sport because of what makes them homosexual whilst different-gender females will do better at traditionally male sports. Do'nt give me a hard time - look at the actual facts. Lots of sportspeople have 'come out' and the truth can be seen.

How many World-class footballers have been Gay?

How many World-class female Tennis players have been lesbian?

It is to do with the way their brains work. Women will get an advantage, men will suffer a disadvantage. Why do you people have such a problem with facts and logic?

[AthleticoSpizz]

Careful Friday's....you are winning Ian over

[FridaysGhost]

Careful Friday's....you are winning Ian over

I would say it's impossible to win a bigot over but, bigot is not the right word. I put posts down for the people who read, not the people who respond like stuck pigs. Facts are facts, logic is logic, reality is reality.

It is a great pity that, in an England whose Empire is falling to bits, the younger members of this forum have learnt nothing from history. When civilisations fall it is due to ridiculous new laws being enacted and a populace who think they're terribly civilised and thus their views will obviously be enough to save them from any emerging competitor. The ancient Greek civilisation did not survive, in Rome, a horse was elected Consul, in England, after 2000 years of knowing right from wrong, wrong is now right if there are enough votes in it AND if you can con the electorate into backing that.

Stand up and make yourself known every person on this site who believes that buggery is as valid as falling in love with a beautiful lady and making love to her!

[Ian Royal]

Careful Friday's....you are winning Ian over

Not much chance of that spizz.

[AthleticoSpizz]

Glad to hear it mate

Beware...he's a bit of a charmer though