by Schards#2 » 26 Feb 2009 12:43
by T.R.O.L.I. » 26 Feb 2009 12:48
by CMRoyal » 26 Feb 2009 12:58
Schards#2 I think less than 90 will be necessary as this division is nigh on universal dross as evidenced by the top three struggling to win a game between them recently.
by Sun Tzu » 26 Feb 2009 13:03
by Alan Partridge » 26 Feb 2009 13:40
T.R.O.L.I. 'greed, Schards.
And to think people on here were worried about WoLOLves beating our 106 point record
by Hoop Blah » 26 Feb 2009 13:46
by Sun Tzu » 26 Feb 2009 13:47
Hoop Blah I'm sure someone in Sunderland probably said exactly the same thing a few years ago!
Records are there to be broken, and whilst it will take something very special to beat it I wouldn't rule it out.
by Snowball » 26 Feb 2009 15:27
Schards#2 I think less than 90 will be necessary as this division is nigh on universal dross as evidenced by the top three struggling to win a game between them recently.
by Mr Angry » 26 Feb 2009 16:10
SnowballSchards#2 I think less than 90 will be necessary as this division is nigh on universal dross as evidenced by the top three struggling to win a game between them recently.
by Snowball » 26 Feb 2009 16:59
by The whole year inn » 01 Mar 2009 03:50
by readingbedding » 01 Mar 2009 10:04
by Gunny Fishcake » 01 Mar 2009 10:08
by readingbedding » 01 Mar 2009 10:13
by Schards#2 » 01 Mar 2009 10:22
readingbedding Why wouldn't we be?
No surprise for me.
by Platypuss » 01 Mar 2009 13:03
by readingbedding » 01 Mar 2009 13:06
by The 17 Bus » 01 Mar 2009 13:08
Schards#2readingbedding Why wouldn't we be?
No surprise for me.
You don't find it surprising that a team that hasn't had a player score for 9 hours are favourites to win the division?
I would guess that this scenario has never happened before in the history of football.
Gunny Fishcake is right, it's a bad bunch. I'm far from convinced we are the best of it though.
by Royal Rother » 01 Mar 2009 13:13
Indeed. Everyone knows that when you make new signings, just slot 'em in and watch the surge in form - it's always worked that way hasn't it?What a ridiculous division. A few well-chosen signings in January to correct a couple of obvious deficiencies and we'd be home and hosed by now.
by PEARCEY » 01 Mar 2009 13:18
The 17 BusSchards#2readingbedding Why wouldn't we be?
No surprise for me.
You don't find it surprising that a team that hasn't had a player score for 9 hours are favourites to win the division?
I would guess that this scenario has never happened before in the history of football.
Gunny Fishcake is right, it's a bad bunch. I'm far from convinced we are the best of it though.
third best at the moment, and probably the most bizarre season I have ever seen with us in it, you often see one fall apart, Watford last season, but to have the top 3 in the bottom of the current form like this is astonishing. ANd no one is really coming up to the top ala Palace the other year from the bottom at Xmas.
Users browsing this forum: Royal Ginger and 354 guests