Nick Blackman

[WoodleyRoyal]

Ooof is this the end of kes' reign on the team board, hard to see how he can come back from this. #prayforkes

[Extended-Phenotype]

That old chestnut. The drugs thing wasn't a lie. You confessed on here.

You seem to have calmed down a bit of late - that was until your outburst on this thread which has ruined it Everything ok?

What's wrong with drugs? If you had friends when you were young you more than likely would have partaken at one stage or another. As you were, and still are, a sad virgin living in his mummy's basement I can understand your childish and immature at towards the whole subject.

This.

His goodytwoshoes, pee-in-his-pants, square attitude towards it all screams of a never-leaving-the-house, online dungeons & dragons, no life, loner tragic upbringing and his trolling a confirmed symptom of his seething resentment that other people have not lived solitary, boring lives too.

That's why he is so angry all the time, hating on people. He wants people to be sad. Like him. Tragic, really.

"You take drugs, your mind is warped from all the drugs, you are really rattLOLed, you take things too seriously and need to go to the gym, you obviously have the problem cos you got personal, Hillsborough, Liverpool fans, black people, Muslims, gay people, married people, blah blah fcuking blah"

[Snowball]

I assume when we're talking 'taking drugs' we mean has had at some point at least some sort of illegal drug? Because I'm completely unadventurous and even I've smoked some weed... surely 80% of the population have at least tried something.

If 80% is right, does that make the 20% wrong, focked-up, Mummy's boys etc?

If I smoked, I'd be on 80 a day and nicotine-stained head to toe.

If I'd done recreational drugs (other than alcohol) I'd have ended up killing myself, pretty sure

I can (these days) go months without drinking without too much of a problem
but IF I drink, I usually drink too much, feel like sh!t, bang on weight etc.

Some people are just not good at moderation. Some of those KNOW that, so avoid.

Doesn't make them wimps, goody-two-shoes, unadventurous or mummy's boys, just maybe self-aware

[tidus_mi2]

Snowball confirmed to be Kes?

[genome]

So we're all in agreement. Selling Nick Blackman was a good bit of business?

[No Fixed Abode]

This is brilliant. We have an EP personal outburst on this thread trying to provoke a reaction from me and then he goes on to condone (and CountryRoyal) the use of drugs. *And then calls me the troll.

The only wimps on this thread are those advocating and using drugs. You know, the weak minded.

[leon]

Good to see you losers still going round and round in circles

[No Fixed Abode]

Good to see you losers still going round and round in circles

+1

Let's get back on topic rather than react to EP's trolling.

[John Smith]

This is brilliant. We have an EP personal outburst on this thread trying to provoke a reaction from me and then he goes on to condone (and CountryRoyal) the use of drugs. *And then calls me the troll.

The only wimps on this thread are those advocating and using drugs. You know, the weak minded.

I wasn't advocating the use of druuugs! I was merely talking to someone on their level!

[No Fixed Abode]

This is brilliant. We have an EP personal outburst on this thread trying to provoke a reaction from me and then he goes on to condone (and CountryRoyal) the use of drugs. *And then calls me the troll.

The only wimps on this thread are those advocating and using drugs. You know, the weak minded.

I wasn't advocating the use of druuugs! I was merely talking to someone on their level!

Heavy man!

[tee peg]

So we sold Blackman because he took drugs.Fair play to the club.

[WoodleyRoyal]

So we sold Blackman because he took drugs.Fair play to the club.

no, we sold blackman so we could buy drugs

[Maneki Neko]

This is brilliant. We have an EP personal outburst on this thread trying to provoke a reaction from me and then he goes on to condone (and CountryRoyal) the use of drugs. *And then calls me the troll.

The only wimps on this thread are those advocating and using drugs. You know, the weak minded.

drug


/drʌɡ/


noun

noun: drug; plural noun: drugs



1.


a medicine or other substance which has a physiological effect when ingested or otherwise introduced into the body.

[Ian Royal]

I assume when we're talking 'taking drugs' we mean has had at some point at least some sort of illegal drug? Because I'm completely unadventurous and even I've smoked some weed... surely 80% of the population have at least tried something.

If 80% is right, does that make the 20% wrong, focked-up, Mummy's boys etc?

If I smoked, I'd be on 80 a day and nicotine-stained head to toe.

If I'd done recreational drugs (other than alcohol) I'd have ended up killing myself, pretty sure

I can (these days) go months without drinking without too much of a problem
but IF I drink, I usually drink too much, feel like sh!t, bang on weight etc.

Some people are just not good at moderation. Some of those KNOW that, so avoid.

Doesn't make them wimps, goody-two-shoes, unadventurous or mummy's boys, just maybe self-aware

Er... wtf?

[Armadillo Roadkill]

I'm proud to say I smoked weed everyday for 17 years, and it never became a habit.

[Jagermesiter1871]

Let's be clear here kes - you really haven't. The sum of argument was that we've sold less packets of Walkers Crisps as a result of a strikers transfer.

Football clubs are run as a BUSINESS these days in case you haven't noticed. Poor form on the pitch has a knock on effect on the rest of the business. Just ask the employees or now former employees of Newcastle United after their relegation.

Right. That point we all get and is a point you've made several hundred times in this thread. The link we're all struggling with is how Nick Blackman, who was on a long goalless streak and being generally detrimental to the sides performances, being sold is poor business, when if we hadn't sold him, he would have more than likely added nothing (more likely worsened) results/performance as well as losing out on the £4 million transfer fee we gained. The point of him being in poor form (or solitary good early season form) looks to be reinforced by his performances at Derby.

We sold him at his peak. Any lost attendance/coke sales/key ring sales as a result of the transfer, pale in comparison to £4million received.

If you haven't got it by now I'm not responding to your next post, more than likely rambling about lost revenue from sales of Blackman shirts as his replacement Rakels has a shorter name and thus is less letters.

Still waiting for the link.

[taipairoyal]

NO WAY.

[No Fixed Abode]

I'm w8ing for the link to prove it was actually good business taking into account all the factors involved and not just "We got 4m for him". Jagermesiter1871 hasn't provided it yet.

[Jagermesiter1871]

I'm w8ing for the link to prove it was actually good business taking into account all the factors involved and not just "We got 4m for him". Jagermesiter1871 hasn't provided it yet.

That's all I wanted Kes - you to admit you don't actually have a link.

The aforequoted post clearly outlines the 'other factors' you allude to and there insignificance.

If you're incapable of thinking up any other inconsequential factors then we're done here.

[John Smith]

I'm w8ing for the link to prove it was actually good business taking into account all the factors involved and not just "We got 4m for him". Jagermesiter1871 hasn't provided it yet.

I think no goals and barely any starts for Der*choke*by in the 2nd half of the season and 6 months left on his contract is the only proof you need that Nicky Hammond is a better fleecer than a Hebredian shepherd mate. Jog on back to Radamel Falcao and Juan Cuadrado