by Snowball »
15 Jan 2012 12:02
[quote="SCIAG"]
Depends what stats you use. In goals alone (you did say "ALF is the best goal scorer we have"), Church takes about 13 minutes less to score. That's so insignificant that it is silly to claim one is better at scoring than the other, particularly considering when those minutes are and the slightly different roles they play.
[/quote
You cannot HONESTLY ignore the other stuff ALF has done. His assists score is excellent and shows
how much of a team-player he is AS WELL AS BEING our top scorer, and this at a time when it looks
like he's out of favour a little bit and therefore likely to have lower confidence.
He is also the best player we have for making a GREAT pass or a defence-splitting pass
and but for some bad luck, poor play by others some of those other passes should have made great goals.
Church is, IMO EASY to play against. Try watching his a bit more. Many of those "chasing down"
runs are 20-30-40-50 yards runs and they are going to matter about 1-2-3 times a season.
They are, IMO, as showy as some of Feds' saves.
Long HURT opponents. He made them BLEED. He BATTERED them. He ran his guts out, all
games, harder, and braver and with more determination on an off day than Church at his best
Hunt too, he's like a focking TERRIER never giving defenders peace. That is why premiership defenders said
the pair wore the out and never stopped, that's why the PAIRING Long and Hunt was so useful, and why, at
least there's the WBA rumour.
I don't want to knock Church and I believe that eventually he will find a role, but he isn't remotely nasty
enough to be a main striker. He isn't brave enough or stupid enough.
And when did this list MORPH? It used to be said that Church had all the ball-skills and LONG had
the first touch of a rapist