by readingbedding » 03 Dec 2007 19:52
by Wycombe Royal » 03 Dec 2007 20:08
by URZZZZZZZZ » 03 Dec 2007 21:59
readingbedding Going to recover 100% and finally look like a player who can compete against strong players again?
I'm a bit worried about him.
by JC » 03 Dec 2007 22:51
by loyalroyal4life » 04 Dec 2007 01:52
by Royalee » 04 Dec 2007 02:36
by Wycombe Royal » 04 Dec 2007 09:39
loyalroyal4life Namely: Gunnarsson, harper and hunt 3/4 of our current midfield!!
by loyalroyal4life » 04 Dec 2007 12:09
Wycombe Royalloyalroyal4life Namely: Gunnarsson, harper and hunt 3/4 of our current midfield!!
Harper and Hunt are not shocking week in week out. If you truly believe that then I can only assume that your eyesight is crap.
by brendywendy » 04 Dec 2007 12:22
loyalroyal4lifeWycombe Royalloyalroyal4life Namely: Gunnarsson, harper and hunt 3/4 of our current midfield!!
Harper and Hunt are not shocking week in week out. If you truly believe that then I can only assume that your eyesight is crap.
by Wycombe Royal » 04 Dec 2007 12:32
loyalroyal4lifeWycombe Royalloyalroyal4life Namely: Gunnarsson, harper and hunt 3/4 of our current midfield!!
Harper and Hunt are not shocking week in week out. If you truly believe that then I can only assume that your eyesight is crap.
You have to compare to performances in previous seasons and imo yes they are. hunt may try and harper may cover more ground then most players but in terms of what they donate to the team on a weekly basis it is not up to standard!!
Hunt definately is not the same player who managed to squeeze his way into the team regularly from being a deputy to convey!!
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 04 Dec 2007 12:55
Wycombe Royalloyalroyal4lifeWycombe Royalloyalroyal4life Namely: Gunnarsson, harper and hunt 3/4 of our current midfield!!
Harper and Hunt are not shocking week in week out. If you truly believe that then I can only assume that your eyesight is crap.
You have to compare to performances in previous seasons and imo yes they are. hunt may try and harper may cover more ground then most players but in terms of what they donate to the team on a weekly basis it is not up to standard!!
Hunt definately is not the same player who managed to squeeze his way into the team regularly from being a deputy to convey!!
Harper is having to run ther midfield almost on his own, due to the invisible Gunnarsson. Harper is the best passer in our team but he needs people to pass to. If no-one makes themself available then it really isn't a surprise that he gets caught in possession or makes a backwards pass.
by RobRoyal » 04 Dec 2007 13:03
floyd__streeteRoyalee As for Convey, he's still grabbed an assist in the last two games, which is an assist more than Hunt
What were assists known as before 1992 and before Fantasy Football League?
by Uke » 04 Dec 2007 14:39
RobRoyalfloyd__streeteRoyalee As for Convey, he's still grabbed an assist in the last two games, which is an assist more than Hunt
What were assists known as before 1992 and before Fantasy Football League?
Yeah, 'assists' are so plastic
by John Madejski's Wallet » 04 Dec 2007 17:01
Wycombe Royal Harper is having to run ther midfield almost on his own, due to the invisible Gunnarsson. Harper is the best passer in our team but he needs people to pass to. If no-one makes themself available then it really isn't a surprise that he gets caught in possession or makes a backwards pass, while indicating for the defender to pass forwards as he doesn't have the bottle to take responsibility for a forward pass himself
by Dickie Davies » 04 Dec 2007 17:06
John Madejski's WalletWycombe Royal Harper is having to run ther midfield almost on his own, due to the invisible Gunnarsson. Harper is the best passer in our team but he needs people to pass to. If no-one makes themself available then it really isn't a surprise that he gets caught in possession or makes a backwards pass, while indicating for the defender to pass forwards as he doesn't have the bottle to take responsibility for a forward pass himself
There, i've corrected it for you
by who are ya? » 04 Dec 2007 17:56
londinium and indeed that Sonko IS superman and not just another player that looked good against average players.
by tom_t69 » 05 Dec 2007 11:01
by Wycombe Royal » 05 Dec 2007 11:05
John Madejski's WalletWycombe Royal Harper is having to run ther midfield almost on his own, due to the invisible Gunnarsson. Harper is the best passer in our team but he needs people to pass to. If no-one makes themself available then it really isn't a surprise that he gets caught in possession or makes a backwards pass, while indicating for the defender to pass forwards as he doesn't have the bottle to take responsibility for a forward pass himself
There, i've corrected it for you
by Archie's penalty » 05 Dec 2007 11:20
Wycombe RoyalJohn Madejski's WalletWycombe Royal Harper is having to run ther midfield almost on his own, due to the invisible Gunnarsson. Harper is the best passer in our team but he needs people to pass to. If no-one makes themself available then it really isn't a surprise that he gets caught in possession or makes a backwards pass, while indicating for the defender to pass forwards as he doesn't have the bottle to take responsibility for a forward pass himself
There, i've corrected it for you
Have you? How very intelligent and witty. So basically because Harper has no one to make a forward pass to and therefore passes it back you think he is at fault.
So what would you think if he "took responsibility" and made a forward pass and we lost possession? Would you congratulate him for taking responsibility or would you berate him for giving away possession? I know which it would be.
by Dawn » 07 Dec 2007 10:57
Users browsing this forum: ayjaydee, From Despair To Where?, Majestic-12 [Bot] and 415 guests