
by Forbury Lion » 05 Dec 2008 12:43
by Handsome Man » 05 Dec 2008 12:44
by papereyes » 05 Dec 2008 13:14
Handsome Man Murty may have had a better game than him on Monday, but Duberry has done well for us is general. Keown was such a depressing signing. It is so brilliant how quickly everything changed round in less than a year.
His last season at Arsenal had been painful as we was repeatedly given last minute substitute appearances on the wing to accrue enough appearances to get a Premiership winners' medal. When he came to us he was so obviously past it. I thought he was crap anyway - I might have had a chance at centre half with Tony Adams and Steve Bould beside me, Patrick Viera and another defensive midfielder in front and David Seaman behind.
by Whore Jackie » 05 Dec 2008 13:15
papereyes Didn't our form absolutely disintegrate that season? Were they brought in as it disintegrated or before?
Anyway, Keown played about 5 games for us, Ferdinand about double that. Impact on the pitch - minimal, impact behind the scenes? Who knows.
Oh, and if you want to see a small squad, Soccerbase, Reading squad, 04/05
by Row Z Royal » 05 Dec 2008 13:18
M-U-R-T-Y
by rhroyal » 05 Dec 2008 13:22
Whore JackieHuntley & Palmerrabidbee Duberry has only just turned 33, and should still be good for another season or two, I would have thought. Good experience, good physical strength, hopefully a good influence around the kids. Keown was 38 when he moved here, and clearly past it, especially as he wasn't given a cvoaching role. Hopefully he was still a positive influence on the younger players, but you could hardly rate his reading career as successful. Or even notable.
Keown did a job for us, was a rock when he came on at Sunderland away which was a massive win for us after being a goal down and allowed us to have a sniff of the playoffs until we capitulated against Cardiff
Quite right. Keown turned that game.
Never understood the vitriol surrounding the loan signings of Keown and Ferdinand. Suspect their influence off the field more than compensated for the lesser impact on the pitch. You can count on one finger, the loan signings – over the last 10 years – that have been truly made the difference, and Upson’s now an England regular. LittIe, for one, was really quite poor, whilst on loan from Burnley. Certainly wouldn’t be averse to a seasoned pro or two on loan, just to nudge us closer to promotion.
by Whore Jackie » 05 Dec 2008 13:25
rhroyal I'd say Upson's the best centre back I've seen play for us, he looked like the good kid in the playground when he was in Div 1. Chadwick had moments, but in general our short term signings have had very little impact since I've been following. Ferdinand and Keown were no different, I'd rather have Doobs any day. I think Michael Branch and Leo Roget take the prize for the most useless loan signings ever though. We still went up mind you.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 159 guests