Focher Plymouth aside, he has comfortably done enough to merit the job in my opinion.
Tactically good, team selection good, subs good, motivation good, fitness good, comes across well.
^^^ Thats the bit he has in spades over Rogers
Not once can I recall Rogers making a substitution/formation change that had a positive effect on the match. In fact often the reverse has happened.
BM on the other hand does to read the game well and make good subs/formation changes at the right time.... I include the Plymouth game in that, its just the players played like crap