Norfolk Royal LOL at us being 'the Chelsea of this division.'
I take it he didn't mean by spending money. Still nice to read in a way though
we do it tghe arsenal way
everyone knows that

by brendywendy » 09 Nov 2008 17:07
Norfolk Royal LOL at us being 'the Chelsea of this division.'
I take it he didn't mean by spending money. Still nice to read in a way though
by RoyalBlue » 09 Nov 2008 17:57
royalexile S Long - passion not petulance.
royalexile Long apologised for this.
royalexile There is a fine line between throwing your shirt on the ground after scoring and throwing your shirt on the ground after being substitiuted.
by John 3:16 » 09 Nov 2008 19:04
RoyalBlueroyalexile S Long - passion not petulance.
![]()
royalexile Long apologised for this.
That's alright then - obviously was just so passionate about being substituted!
royalexile There is a fine line between throwing your shirt on the ground after scoring and throwing your shirt on the ground after being substitiuted.
by DelBoyRodders » 09 Nov 2008 19:07
John 3:16 have a feeling that the action you are referring to wasn't because he was substituted, but because of his performance in that game. Didn't he say he didn't feel he was worthy of wearing the shirt he was so crap? Not saying it was the right thing to do, just saying that:
Throwing shirt down in disgust to your own performance >> than throwing your shirt down in a tantrum cos you've been subbed.
by BobKnows » 09 Nov 2008 19:09
DelBoyRoddersJohn 3:16 have a feeling that the action you are referring to wasn't because he was substituted, but because of his performance in that game. Didn't he say he didn't feel he was worthy of wearing the shirt he was so crap? Not saying it was the right thing to do, just saying that:
Throwing shirt down in disgust to your own performance >> than throwing your shirt down in a tantrum cos you've been subbed.
...and you believe that version of events?
by PEARCEY » 09 Nov 2008 19:20
Archie's penaltyIan Royal Yep, I maintain, best for all concerned if Lita parts company with RFC, he'll be happier and have a better chance of furthering his career. We'll have gotten rid of a troublesome* player who just isn't working at the club.
In this instance I mainly mean one that should be very good but has failed to perform for us for close to 18 months. Despite being given plenty of opportunity.
Agreed. And what with the way we have replaced Kitson and Shorey this year I have faith we will find an appropriate replacement for Leroy.
I am not a Leroy hater. I just think it's time for him to move on.
by Fat Leather Jacket » 09 Nov 2008 19:28
PEARCEYArchie's penaltyIan Royal Yep, I maintain, best for all concerned if Lita parts company with RFC, he'll be happier and have a better chance of furthering his career. We'll have gotten rid of a troublesome* player who just isn't working at the club.
In this instance I mainly mean one that should be very good but has failed to perform for us for close to 18 months. Despite being given plenty of opportunity.
Agreed. And what with the way we have replaced Kitson and Shorey this year I have faith we will find an appropriate replacement for Leroy.
I am not a Leroy hater. I just think it's time for him to move on.
Dont agree. If either N Hunt or Doyle get injured I think Lita can come back in and do the business. His confidence is now back and if he returns to Reading he will score goals in a team creating a lot more chances than the one he last played in.
by Archie's penalty » 09 Nov 2008 19:36
PEARCEYArchie's penaltyIan Royal Yep, I maintain, best for all concerned if Lita parts company with RFC, he'll be happier and have a better chance of furthering his career. We'll have gotten rid of a troublesome* player who just isn't working at the club.
In this instance I mainly mean one that should be very good but has failed to perform for us for close to 18 months. Despite being given plenty of opportunity.
Agreed. And what with the way we have replaced Kitson and Shorey this year I have faith we will find an appropriate replacement for Leroy.
I am not a Leroy hater. I just think it's time for him to move on.
Dont agree. If either N Hunt or Doyle get injured I think Lita can come back in and do the business. His confidence is now back and if he returns to Reading he will score goals in a team creating a lot more chances than the one he last played in.
by PEARCEY » 09 Nov 2008 19:51
by Sun Tzu » 09 Nov 2008 20:11
DelBoyRoddersJohn 3:16 have a feeling that the action you are referring to wasn't because he was substituted, but because of his performance in that game. Didn't he say he didn't feel he was worthy of wearing the shirt he was so crap? Not saying it was the right thing to do, just saying that:
Throwing shirt down in disgust to your own performance >> than throwing your shirt down in a tantrum cos you've been subbed.
...and you believe that version of events?
by Dirk Gently » 09 Nov 2008 20:18
PEARCEYArchie's penaltyIan Royal Yep, I maintain, best for all concerned if Lita parts company with RFC, he'll be happier and have a better chance of furthering his career. We'll have gotten rid of a troublesome* player who just isn't working at the club.
In this instance I mainly mean one that should be very good but has failed to perform for us for close to 18 months. Despite being given plenty of opportunity.
Agreed. And what with the way we have replaced Kitson and Shorey this year I have faith we will find an appropriate replacement for Leroy.
I am not a Leroy hater. I just think it's time for him to move on.
Dont agree. If either N Hunt or Doyle get injured I think Lita can come back in and do the business. His confidence is now back and if he returns to Reading he will score goals in a team creating a lot more chances than the one he last played in.
by PEARCEY » 09 Nov 2008 20:25
by earleyroyal » 09 Nov 2008 20:35
winchester_royalrg6royal Long needs to go out on loan
Lita >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Long
Long's attitude >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lita's attitude
by winchester_royal » 09 Nov 2008 20:57
earleyroyalwinchester_royalrg6royal Long needs to go out on loan
Lita >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Long
Long's attitude >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Lita's attitude
*bangs head against the wall*
Give us proof and not wild speculation please. I have never seen any proof of this legendary bad attitude. Long on the other hand has thrown his shirt down and blatantly not given 100% in a game (Fulham at home last year) before.
Since there is no proof of this bad attitude, because it doesn't exist, how about looking at the quality of both players? Again, Lita is better.
by handbags_harris » 09 Nov 2008 21:05
Sun Tzu The explanation given at the time was that Long had spent the whole game getting kicked by the Liverpool defence and had no protection from the ref, indeed everytime he breathed on the defenders he was penalised and he was frustrated at how the game had gone.
Whether you believe that or not is something else, but believing that he did it for any other reason requires a leap of faith as he's never shown any signs of petulance, arrogance or and other 'ances'. Of course some people prefer to believe the least palatable option.
by Dirk Gently » 09 Nov 2008 21:11
PEARCEY ...and perhaps you are also assuming that it has DIrk
by Schards#2 » 09 Nov 2008 22:01
by Dirk Gently » 09 Nov 2008 22:03
Schards#2 A terrible waste.
by rabidbee » 10 Nov 2008 01:30
Man Friday Kebe has been a revelation - teams put two players on him. Of course he's not Ronaldo but if he was he wouldn't be playing for us.
The home support today was rubbish - could barely muster a song and when we did it soon petered out.
We have a CB with pace - Bikey outruns every opposition forward by jogging let alone running. Ingi wins every header and Bikey covers him for pace. It's a great partnership.
There's little wrong at the mo but beware - if Doyle/NHunt get injured we will struggle.
by Man Friday » 10 Nov 2008 08:06
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot], Royal Ginger and 209 guests