by Isaac Hunt » 30 Apr 2013 14:01
by Royalwaster » 30 Apr 2013 14:19
Isaac Hunt Good, solid, no-nonsense defender, but if Liverpool have any thoughts of performing well in Europe and also breaking into the Top 4 then signing Alex Pearce ain't going to help them.
Don't get me wrong, he's a good defender. In fact the only thing that will stop him being a great defender is his lack of pace. People have said that Terry and Carragher never had any pace....but they had more than Alex. Doesn't matter how long you spend on the training ground coaching him on his positioning etc., you don't get any quicker with age.
by YateleyRoyal » 30 Apr 2013 14:39
Liverpool look set to sign Reading defender Alex Pearce. The 24-year-old centre back is out of contract at the Madejski Stadium in the summer and has rejected a number of offers from the club.
Reds manager Brendan Rodgers worked with Pearce at Reading and promoted him to the role of captain when he was in charge of the club in 2009.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 30 Apr 2013 15:06
by YateleyRoyal » 30 Apr 2013 15:14
LoyalRoyalFan Not overly sure why people are getting worked up about Pearce not signing a new contract. He's been a great servant to this football club, showed great passion and leadership, is Reading through and through. But...
He has every right to demand £30k a week.
Who would you rather play for? One of the biggest clubs in the world (with a friendly former manager) or Championship side Reading?
by Barry the bird boggler » 30 Apr 2013 15:14
winchester_royal A shame that he's leaving on a free rather than signing a contract earlier in the season that would have allowed us to get 2/3 million for a player we brought up through the academy...but still as long he gets a nice fat signing on fee all's well that ends well
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 30 Apr 2013 15:33
Barry the bird bogglerwinchester_royal A shame that he's leaving on a free rather than signing a contract earlier in the season that would have allowed us to get 2/3 million for a player we brought up through the academy...but still as long he gets a nice fat signing on fee all's well that ends well
We would get something though wouldn't we, as a contact has been offered to him and he is an Academy product.
by Mike Hunt » 30 Apr 2013 15:33
by Who Moved The Goalposts? » 30 Apr 2013 15:35
Mike Hunt He turned 24 in November. So not sure if we are entitled compensation?
by winchester_royal » 30 Apr 2013 15:48
Who Moved The Goalposts?Barry the bird bogglerwinchester_royal A shame that he's leaving on a free rather than signing a contract earlier in the season that would have allowed us to get 2/3 million for a player we brought up through the academy...but still as long he gets a nice fat signing on fee all's well that ends well
We would get something though wouldn't we, as a contact has been offered to him and he is an Academy product.
That's my understanding too. I think a tribunal settles it. And from memory, it's based on the size of the contract we offered plus allowances for the investment made him bringing him through. I wouldn't be surprised if we pulled £1m + for him still.
by melonhead » 30 Apr 2013 15:52
RoyalTank Good luck to the lad, he always played with pride and passion and I will never forget some of the goal celebrations.
He is moving upwards and you can never fault a player for that. I hope he can eventually break into the first team and have a great career, he deserves it.
by TBM » 30 Apr 2013 15:57
by RoyalBlue » 30 Apr 2013 16:13
by Mike Hunt » 30 Apr 2013 16:53
RoyalBlue Given the failings and non-signings of the past two transfer windows and now this, can Nick(y) Hammond continue to keep coming up smelling of roses?
Should more not have been done to secure Pearce's services on a new contract before we doubtless peed him off by bringing in the guys on the really big bucks in the summer?
by Esteban » 30 Apr 2013 16:57
RoyalBlue Given the failings and non-signings of the past two transfer windows and now this, can Nick(y) Hammond continue to keep coming up smelling of roses?
Should more not have been done to secure Pearce's services on a new contract before we doubtless peed him off by bringing in the guys on the really big bucks in the summer?
by Ian Royal » 30 Apr 2013 17:36
by Royal With Cheese » 30 Apr 2013 17:38
by sandman » 30 Apr 2013 18:16
by winchester_royal » 30 Apr 2013 18:20
sandman Been on the cards all season and Rodgers has been in contact with him since last summer.
Ok with him leaving have always thought he's good but certainly not irreplaceable and his distribution and lack of pace leave a lot to be desired.
Tbh I don't think he's good enough for a club who are pushing for Europe but that's Liverpool's problem. Good luck to Pearcey though and hopefully Rodgers will be able to manage him a bit better than he did when he was here when imo opinion he set Alex back a bit.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 30 Apr 2013 18:22
YateleyRoyalLoyalRoyalFan Not overly sure why people are getting worked up about Pearce not signing a new contract. He's been a great servant to this football club, showed great passion and leadership, is Reading through and through. But...
He has every right to demand £30k a week.
Who would you rather play for? One of the biggest clubs in the world (with a friendly former manager) or Championship side Reading?
Go on then, I'll bite. Why does he?
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 199 guests