by Green » 22 Jan 2015 17:57
by harry » 22 Jan 2015 19:21
by Ascotroyal83 » 22 Jan 2015 21:09
by Ian Royal » 22 Jan 2015 21:58
starliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
If someone comes along and says, look, Melchester Rovers Supporters Trust have done this, this and this and STAR hasn't, then we should a) know about it and b) try and do something about it as we believe - looking objectively at membership numbers, benefits and engagement with club and fans - we are one of the stronger trusts of clubs in our division.
But please don't expect this number of posts from starliaison every day!
by gdroyal » 23 Jan 2015 00:17
by Pepe the Horseman » 23 Jan 2015 11:20
by Dixeyroyal » 23 Jan 2015 11:31
starliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
If someone comes along and says, look, Melchester Rovers Supporters Trust have done this, this and this and STAR hasn't, then we should a) know about it and b) try and do something about it as we believe - looking objectively at membership numbers, benefits and engagement with club and fans - we are one of the stronger trusts of clubs in our division.
But please don't expect this number of posts from starliaison every day!
by WoodleyRoyal » 23 Jan 2015 11:39
Dixeyroyalstarliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
If someone comes along and says, look, Melchester Rovers Supporters Trust have done this, this and this and STAR hasn't, then we should a) know about it and b) try and do something about it as we believe - looking objectively at membership numbers, benefits and engagement with club and fans - we are one of the stronger trusts of clubs in our division.
But please don't expect this number of posts from starliaison every day!
That's not strictly true though is it Starliaison?
I have personally suggested a number of perceived improvements for the benefit of members, such as allocated seat numbers when you book away coaches, and on each occasion they have been completely ignored, maybe because it does not benefit those running STAR themselves who travel away?
by Sutekh » 23 Jan 2015 12:26
by handbags_harris » 23 Jan 2015 12:32
RG30 And all those moaning about traffic..we managed to play Blackpool successfully on Easter Monday in 2009.
by STAR Liaison » 23 Jan 2015 13:34
by Forbury Lion » 23 Jan 2015 13:51
It's the right approach - You can't Reading FC to engage with STAR when STAR have concerns to raise if STAR theirselves don't engage with it's members/those they represent when they wish to raise concerns/criticise STAR.starliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
by STAR Liaison » 23 Jan 2015 19:04
Dixeyroyalstarliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
If someone comes along and says, look, Melchester Rovers Supporters Trust have done this, this and this and STAR hasn't, then we should a) know about it and b) try and do something about it as we believe - looking objectively at membership numbers, benefits and engagement with club and fans - we are one of the stronger trusts of clubs in our division.
But please don't expect this number of posts from starliaison every day!
That's not strictly true though is it Starliaison?
I have personally suggested a number of perceived improvements for the benefit of members, such as allocated seat numbers when you book away coaches, and on each occasion they have been completely ignored, maybe because it does not benefit those running STAR themselves who travel away?
by RG30 » 06 Apr 2015 12:30
by bobby1413 » 06 Apr 2015 15:43
RG30 So, did the club ever respond to STAR's letter
by Forbury Lion » 07 Apr 2015 14:35
but Melchester Rovers supporters trust post this many every day.starliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
If someone comes along and says, look, Melchester Rovers Supporters Trust have done this, this and this and STAR hasn't, then we should a) know about it and b) try and do something about it as we believe - looking objectively at membership numbers, benefits and engagement with club and fans - we are one of the stronger trusts of clubs in our division.
But please don't expect this number of posts from starliaison every day!
by STAR Liaison » 07 Apr 2015 14:55
Forbury Lionbut Melchester Rovers supporters trust post this many every day.starliaison Thank you for your support, Ian, but I disagree, in that we feel we should engage our critics, within reason, not ignore them.
If someone comes along and says, look, Melchester Rovers Supporters Trust have done this, this and this and STAR hasn't, then we should a) know about it and b) try and do something about it as we believe - looking objectively at membership numbers, benefits and engagement with club and fans - we are one of the stronger trusts of clubs in our division.
But please don't expect this number of posts from starliaison every day!
by STAR Liaison » 07 Apr 2015 14:57
bobby1413RG30 So, did the club ever respond to STAR's letter
STAR never sent it on account of running out of stamps. Very disappointing
by Winston Smith » 07 Apr 2015 15:46
starliaison Surprised to be the first with the news here but another Bank Holiday fixture has bitten the re-arranged dust.
Blackpool away has moved from Bank Holiday Easter Monday 3pm to the following day at 7.45pm. There doesn't seem to us to be any particularly good reason for this and STAR has written to the club to express its disappointment in this matter.
There is also a statement on the STAR website making the case for Bank Holiday football for the fans' benefit.
by Gordons Cumming » 07 Apr 2015 15:52
Users browsing this forum: parky and 151 guests