Archie's penalty Replays on all goals would not slow the game down. There's always a break after goals anyway.
+1
by Kitson12 » 19 Nov 2009 00:11
Archie's penalty Replays on all goals would not slow the game down. There's always a break after goals anyway.
by Quagmire » 19 Nov 2009 01:28
paultheroyal Whole of Reading FC team on the afternoon of 22/09/08
by soggy biscuit » 19 Nov 2009 08:23
Archie's penaltyTBMArchie's penalty Watford 2 Reading 2. HTH.
Exactly
Why didn't the whole Reading team tell the ref is wasn't a goal............are they now all cheats?
Not quite as important a game though
by Sun Tzu » 19 Nov 2009 08:42
Quagmire
Henry felt the ball hit his hand and yet celebrated the goal.
by papereyes » 19 Nov 2009 10:02
Harold 'the Battering Ram' Schumacher.
by AF1 » 19 Nov 2009 10:21
paultheroyalKitson12paultheroyal Whole of Reading FC team on the afternoon of 22/09/08
Sorry?
You must of mis-heard me, I said
Whole of Reading FC team on the afternoon of 22/09/08
by Thaumagurist* » 19 Nov 2009 13:28
by paultheroyal » 19 Nov 2009 13:42
by Thaumagurist* » 19 Nov 2009 13:45
by Sun Tzu » 19 Nov 2009 13:46
paultheroyal Richard,
Reading knew it was not a goal, - Many a clip has James Harper running back to the centre circle begging his team mates to join him knowing ref had cocked up and celebrate goal. Reading had a further opportunity to re-set the scores after the interval, but chose not too.
by paultheroyal » 19 Nov 2009 13:48
by Sun Tzu » 19 Nov 2009 13:52
paultheroyal Hang on a sec - Reading knew they scored through unfair means and yet did nothing to change the scoreline or let the referee know that a cock up had been made. How is that different to last night. My comments are valid.
by Thaumagurist* » 19 Nov 2009 13:53
Sun Tzupaultheroyal Hang on a sec - Reading knew they scored through unfair means and yet did nothing to change the scoreline or let the referee know that a cock up had been made. How is that different to last night. My comments are valid.
It's pretty similar in that there has been a huge and largely ill informed over reaction in both cases.
You ASSUME the Reading players knew the goal was wrongly awarded yet players afterwards said they hadn't a clue what was going on.
Players taking unilateral action to change a scoreline is almost unheard of despite there being endless examples of goals being wrongly awarded or denied. We'd end up in the same stupid situation we reached a season or two back where teams were expected to kick the ball out of play if an opponent sneezed. All you can ask of players is to allow the referee to make decisions and then abide by them (not actively cheating would also be very nice ! But in the Watford game no one cheated)
by wolsey » 19 Nov 2009 13:54
by paultheroyal » 19 Nov 2009 13:58
wolsey I don't understand what the fuss is over Henri. Every professional sportsman will do what they can to to win; sometimes (quite often) this will involve breaking the laws of the game: this is why organised sport has referees.
Would there have been such a furore had the foul been a blatant push on a defender rather than a handball?
by cmonurz » 19 Nov 2009 14:01
by Thaumagurist* » 19 Nov 2009 14:02
paultheroyal It was instinct from Henry, and got away with it.
by wolsey » 19 Nov 2009 14:12
Thaumagurist*paultheroyal It was instinct from Henry, and got away with it.
Yeah, his instinct is to cheat.
by AF1 » 19 Nov 2009 14:12
paultheroyal Richard,
Reading knew it was not a goal, - Many a clip has James Harper running back to the centre circle begging his team mates to join him knowing ref had cocked up and celebrate goal. Reading had a further opportunity to re-set the scores after the interval, but chose not too.
by Ginger Ninjas » 19 Nov 2009 16:29
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 64 guests