by YateleyRoyal » 05 Oct 2011 09:58
by M-U-R-T-Y » 05 Oct 2011 10:45
by ZacNaloen » 05 Oct 2011 10:53
by Elmer Park » 05 Oct 2011 21:11
by FiNeRaIn » 05 Oct 2011 22:46
by winchester_royal » 06 Oct 2011 01:55
FiNeRaIn So Sir JM is richer than Dave whelan, yet he bankrolls wigan's 40,000 + wages and ridiculous transfer fee's in the prem. Meanwhile we can't even spend what we make on our own player sales.
Ok.
by Jackson Corner » 06 Oct 2011 03:15
winchester_royalFiNeRaIn So Sir JM is richer than Dave whelan, yet he bankrolls wigan's 40,000 + wages and ridiculous transfer fee's in the prem. Meanwhile we can't even spend what we make on our own player sales.
Ok.
Errrr, who at Wigan is on 40k+?
And what are these 'ridiculous transfer fees' you talk of?
by Handsome Man » 06 Oct 2011 07:58
FiNeRaIn So Sir JM is richer than Dave whelan, yet he bankrolls wigan's 40,000 + wages and ridiculous transfer fee's in the prem. Meanwhile we can't even spend what we make on our own player sales.
Ok.
by TBM » 06 Oct 2011 09:46
by Svlad Cjelli » 06 Oct 2011 09:49
TBM 2. Alisher Usmanov £12.4bn - Arsenal (Last year £8bn, 3rd)
Why the hell dont Arsenal use this guy ^^ more and actually spend some cash on some decent players!?
by TBM » 06 Oct 2011 09:50
by Svlad Cjelli » 06 Oct 2011 09:53
by Ian Royal » 06 Oct 2011 18:14
Elmer Park Each year I find myself surprised at how some of the men on the list are connected to smaller Clubs. I hadn't realised Swindon and Doncaster had such rich backers and in Scotland, Ross County and Elgin City.
It's up to any individual how they spend their money of course and these men didn't get where they are today by being frivolous with their money but it's amazing to think Everton have a billionaire connected with the Club yet don't apparently have a penny to spend. I know a lot of business wealth is on paper only but if I was a billionaire and keen Everton fan I just can't see how I would be able to resist investing a few million in the Club even if I didn't try to turn them into a Manchester City.
by FiNeRaIn » 06 Oct 2011 20:01
winchester_royal
Errrr, who at Wigan is on 40k+?
And what are these 'ridiculous transfer fees' you talk of?
by Elmer Park » 06 Oct 2011 20:04
Ian RoyalElmer Park Each year I find myself surprised at how some of the men on the list are connected to smaller Clubs. I hadn't realised Swindon and Doncaster had such rich backers and in Scotland, Ross County and Elgin City.
It's up to any individual how they spend their money of course and these men didn't get where they are today by being frivolous with their money but it's amazing to think Everton have a billionaire connected with the Club yet don't apparently have a penny to spend. I know a lot of business wealth is on paper only but if I was a billionaire and keen Everton fan I just can't see how I would be able to resist investing a few million in the Club even if I didn't try to turn them into a Manchester City.
Who says owners are typically keen, or fans?
by Ian Royal » 06 Oct 2011 20:12
by winchester_royal » 06 Oct 2011 22:32
FiNeRaInwinchester_royal
Errrr, who at Wigan is on 40k+?
And what are these 'ridiculous transfer fees' you talk of?
Did you just start following football yesterday? Wtf....you actually believe what you write too.
by FiNeRaIn » 06 Oct 2011 23:39
winchester_royal
No seriously, this year, which is the year of the rich list that you based your post on, who at Wigan is on 40k+, and what was has been their net transfer spend?
by Wax Jacket » 07 Oct 2011 08:37
Svlad Cjelli There is certainly a large amount of blood on his hands.
by winchester_royal » 07 Oct 2011 11:49
FiNeRaInwinchester_royal
No seriously, this year, which is the year of the rich list that you based your post on, who at Wigan is on 40k+, and what was has been their net transfer spend?
That post is completely irrelevant, football finances haven't just started this season and neither has that rich list. Since wigan have been in the prem they have spent masses on player transfers and wages with a half full ground every week. They have been completely bankrolled. They might be spending considerably less at the moment but even then the value of their current team is probably 20 times more expensive than ours. A lot of their players would be on nearly 40k if not more, dread to think what rodallega is on seeing as he was a proven international signing for 4.5 million. kirkland will be on a lot as will Gary Caldwell who turned Celtic down as he dismissed their offer as derisory. I think a large part of their squad wouldn't be too far of 40k if we are to believe the Reading wages from our seasons in the prem. Since then its inflated even worse.
As for their net transfer spend...LOL. I would suggest looking at Reading...about 40 million out and about 3-4 million spent since relegation. I would be interested to see that net spend % compared to the rest of world football, I bet its top 10.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 71 guests