by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 20 Jun 2012 12:03
by Ian Royal » 20 Jun 2012 12:36
Rev Algenon Stickleback H Apart from anything else, it's not as if there are hundreds of guys dressed like that. I think there's about four of them.
Besides, who's to say that's specifically a crusader costume anyway? Isn't that just standard dress for a knight of the era?
by St Pauli » 20 Jun 2012 17:53
by Maguire » 20 Jun 2012 17:57
St Pauli TBF the only thing more LOLaughbLOLe then that column is the red faced white van man reaction it's got on this thread.
Some great trolling there by the Grauniad.
by southbank1871 » 21 Jun 2012 09:23
by blindedbythelights » 21 Jun 2012 09:32
by southbank1871 » 21 Jun 2012 09:34
by Stuka » 21 Jun 2012 10:25
St Pauli TBF the only thing more LOLaughbLOLe then that column is the red faced white van man reaction it's got on this thread.
Some great trolling there by the Grauniad.
by St Pauli » 21 Jun 2012 18:25
by St Pauli » 21 Jun 2012 19:06
southbank1871 I believe so, not that I was there.
Dude sees himself as some sort of left wing champion, but also gets a hard-on over German ultras. Bit odd.
by Maguire » 21 Jun 2012 19:22
St Pauli Very good Stuka.
The guardian article is shit and clearly written by a joyless phucker who isn't a football fan. That doesn't change the fact that it's amusing to see people getting worked up about an article that is classic guardian PC copy. It's the right wing equivalent of me moaning on a thread about how evil and wacist the Daily Mail is.
by Franchise FC » 21 Jun 2012 19:39
watfordroyal What did he think the St Georges cross symbolised? Have we got to change our flag to protect his sensitivities?![]()
In England, he is surrounded by Christian symbols because this is a (psudo-)Christian country, what sportswear does use? what car does he drive?, what trainers does he wear? what phone does he use?
by St Pauli » 21 Jun 2012 20:15
Maguire Not sure it makes someone "worked up" if they brand a shit article shit, but at least you got ot say "right wing", "white van man", and Daily Mail all on the same thread. Christmas come early for you.
The Guardian might be the inverse of the Daily Mail but they're both equally as bullshiiiit.
by Maguire » 21 Jun 2012 20:17
St PauliMaguire Not sure it makes someone "worked up" if they brand a shit article shit, but at least you got ot say "right wing", "white van man", and Daily Mail all on the same thread. Christmas come early for you.
The Guardian might be the inverse of the Daily Mail but they're both equally as bullshiiiit.
It was a great opportunity to cultivate the St Pauli brand/stereotype, agreed.
*Takes off lefty hat* I don't actually think the Daily Mail is racist.
by Stuka » 22 Jun 2012 09:06
by St Pauli » 22 Jun 2012 17:01
Stuka I bet I'm more left wing than you St. Pauli. I once wrote a piece for the Socialist Alliance newspaper and I'm a vegetarian.
by Stuka » 22 Jun 2012 19:18
by Libertine » 23 Jun 2012 04:42
by St Pauli » 23 Jun 2012 11:25
Stuka I think the S.A. was dissolved once it became apparent the SWP were trying to take it over from within. They had a paper called "The Socialist". What a load of twaddle.
Stuka Genuinely vegetarian. I care more about animal welfare than I do London bus driver's Olympic bonuses.
by Deadlock » 23 Jun 2012 12:46
Stuka Genuinely vegetarian. I care more about animal welfare than I do London bus driver's Olympic bonuses.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 52 guests