Generic clubs in financial crisis Thread

[No Fixed Abode]

And an increased turnover.

[AthleticoSpizz]

Yes, well done Chelsea

We would quite happily pay twiceover just to watch your sportsmanship values.

[No Fixed Abode]

Yes, well done Chelsea

We would quite happily pay twiceover just to watch your sportsmanship values.

Didn't Pogrebniak get a 2nd yellow for diving against Brighton?

And Gunter was booked for diving against Blackburn

[AthleticoSpizz]

Dunno mate...I wasn't there....unlike......erm you?

[No Fixed Abode]

Dunno mate...I wasn't there....unlike......erm you?

Unlucky m8- you've had a mare there. Sorry about your shit reply.

[AthleticoSpizz]

Kes...you are a darling...you really are

Like watching a dog chasing its own tail.

Dont ever change

[Mr Optimist]

And an increased turnover.

Turnover is vanity, profit is sanity.

[Big Foot]

And an increased turnover.

Turnover is vanity, profit is sanity.

Football is the very definition of financial insanity.

[Mr Optimist]

And an increased turnover.

Turnover is vanity, profit is sanity.

Football is the very definition of financial insanity.

Absolutely big plus 1.

Like how having a larger turnover somehow justifies or explains away a £50m loss over 12 months. Financial Fairofl plolay. At least the big clubs of Europe have so much revenue coming in from non plsaying streams such as kit sales they can make a case.

[Uke]

Looks like Reading FC need investment from new owners soon

[Brum Royal]

Charlton have completed being taken over by a Belgian entreneur Roland Duchatelet

[handbags_harris]

Can someone explain to me what the point of having an increased turnover is when you're still making multi-million pound losses? I've got to say, Kes, that I'd generally stopped biting to your moronic contribution to these boards but the mere fact you're arguing an increased turnover in any way negates a £50 million loss is really quite laughable, and shows you have absolutely no idea what you're on about. A loss is a loss, regardless of whether you increase your turnover or not, and Chelsea have been making year on year losses for over a decade. It's just like some bloke saying they have AIDS yet they pull ridiculously fit birds night after night. Problem this chap has is he still has AIDS.

[multisync1830]

Can someone explain to me what the point of having an increased turnover is when you're still making multi-million pound losses? I've got to say, Kes, that I'd generally stopped biting to your moronic contribution to these boards but the mere fact you're arguing an increased turnover in any way negates a £50 million loss is really quite laughable, and shows you have absolutely no idea what you're on about. A loss is a loss, regardless of whether you increase your turnover or not, and Chelsea have been making year on year losses for over a decade. It's just like some bloke saying they have AIDS yet they pull ridiculously fit birds night after night. Problem this chap has is he still has AIDS.

Chelsea made a profit last year.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20270934

[AthleticoSpizz]

Running at a loss...made a profit?....either way its the norm.

Even his other team Man U run at a loss.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... nding.html

[multisync1830]

Running at a loss...made a profit?....either way its the norm.

Even his other team Man U run at a loss.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/footba ... nding.html

I would not try to make sense of football finances they simply do not make any rational sense from an outside perspective. They are fundamentally charities totally reliant on outsiders giving them free money to allow them to squander income on the wrong thing.

[handbags_harris]

Can someone explain to me what the point of having an increased turnover is when you're still making multi-million pound losses? I've got to say, Kes, that I'd generally stopped biting to your moronic contribution to these boards but the mere fact you're arguing an increased turnover in any way negates a £50 million loss is really quite laughable, and shows you have absolutely no idea what you're on about. A loss is a loss, regardless of whether you increase your turnover or not, and Chelsea have been making year on year losses for over a decade. It's just like some bloke saying they have AIDS yet they pull ridiculously fit birds night after night. Problem this chap has is he still has AIDS.

Chelsea made a profit last year.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20270934

Fair point, well presented, I'd forgotten about that tbh, but it's still only £1.4 million. A profit is a profit though...which has immediately been eclipsed the next season. My original point stands. Let's say the chap with AIDS received medication for a year before he stopped taking it.

[leon]

And then his cock fell off

[Barry the bird boggler]

Is that problem solved then?

[From Despair To Where?]

Can someone explain to me what the point of having an increased turnover is when you're still making multi-million pound losses? I've got to say, Kes, that I'd generally stopped biting to your moronic contribution to these boards but the mere fact you're arguing an increased turnover in any way negates a £50 million loss is really quite laughable, and shows you have absolutely no idea what you're on about. A loss is a loss, regardless of whether you increase your turnover or not, and Chelsea have been making year on year losses for over a decade. It's just like some bloke saying they have AIDS yet they pull ridiculously fit birds night after night. Problem this chap has is he still has AIDS.

Chelsea made a profit last year.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/20270934

Fair point, well presented, I'd forgotten about that tbh, but it's still only £1.4 million. A profit is a profit though...which has immediately been eclipsed the next season. My original point stands. Let's say the chap with AIDS received medication for a year before he stopped taking it.

£1.4m? Well, at least Frank Lampard's wages are covered til March.

[Harpers So Solid Crew]

Cardiff announce a 30 million loss, taking the debt to 116million with 66 million owed to Tan

Be very careful what you hope from new owners of Reading