by RobRoyal » 08 Jan 2012 13:04
by Blue&White Mage » 08 Jan 2012 13:06
by Turns8 » 08 Jan 2012 13:07
RobRoyal Had been really lookng forward to this game, seeing as how it was the only interesting fixture of the weekend. Ruined in 15 mins by a dickhead referee. Give me my sunday entertainment back Foy, you wnaker.
by winchester_royal » 08 Jan 2012 13:08
by rhroyal » 08 Jan 2012 13:11
Schards#2rhroyal Everybody knows 2 feet means red these days. Winning the ball doesn't matter. We've seen plenty of "harsh" reds this season, but it appears refs are being consistent with this one. Kompany can't complain.
The logic is that without a foot remaining on the ground, you don't have much control at all and could very easily break a leg even if there is no malicious intent. Right decision in today's context; players need to learn to stop diving in on 2 feet instead of complaining about the reds they receive.
But this isn't a two footed challange
by who are ya? » 08 Jan 2012 13:11
by winchester_royal » 08 Jan 2012 13:13
rhroyalSchards#2rhroyal Everybody knows 2 feet means red these days. Winning the ball doesn't matter. We've seen plenty of "harsh" reds this season, but it appears refs are being consistent with this one. Kompany can't complain.
The logic is that without a foot remaining on the ground, you don't have much control at all and could very easily break a leg even if there is no malicious intent. Right decision in today's context; players need to learn to stop diving in on 2 feet instead of complaining about the reds they receive.
But this isn't a two footed challange
Well neither foot was on the ground; that suggests 2 feet to me.
by Turns8 » 08 Jan 2012 13:16
winchester_royal Nobody likes to see a red card so early in the game, but I don't think Chris Foy had any other option. Both feet left the ground therefore it's a red. It really is as simple as that these days, and Kompany was exceptionally stupid to put the ref in that position in the first place.
by Tails » 08 Jan 2012 13:17
by Handsome Man » 08 Jan 2012 13:17
by Schards#2 » 08 Jan 2012 13:20
rhroyalSchards#2rhroyal Everybody knows 2 feet means red these days. Winning the ball doesn't matter. We've seen plenty of "harsh" reds this season, but it appears refs are being consistent with this one. Kompany can't complain.
The logic is that without a foot remaining on the ground, you don't have much control at all and could very easily break a leg even if there is no malicious intent. Right decision in today's context; players need to learn to stop diving in on 2 feet instead of complaining about the reds they receive.
But this isn't a two footed challange
Well neither foot was on the ground; that suggests 2 feet to me.
by Tails » 08 Jan 2012 13:21
by winchester_royal » 08 Jan 2012 13:21
Turns8winchester_royal Nobody likes to see a red card so early in the game, but I don't think Chris Foy had any other option. Both feet left the ground therefore it's a red. It really is as simple as that these days, and Kompany was exceptionally stupid to put the ref in that position in the first place.
It was no worse than Lamps against Wolves the other week...it's the inconsistency which is sooo annoying...but today it has ruined what was the best looking tie of the round...11 v 11 would have been a great contest as Utd would have been well up for it after the last 2 defeats.
by winchester_royal » 08 Jan 2012 13:21
Schards#2
1 foot isn't within a foot of the ball, the foot that is is on the ground, other than that, you're spot on.
I notice none of the three ex players and ex managers who are pundits agree with the decision but i'm sure they don't have your experience
by Tails » 08 Jan 2012 13:23
Schards#2
1 foot isn't within a foot of the ball, the foot that is is on the ground, other than that, you're spot on.
I notice none of the three ex players and ex managers who are pundits agree with the decision but i'm sure they don't have your experience
by soggy biscuit » 08 Jan 2012 13:23
by sandman » 08 Jan 2012 13:24
winchester_royalSchards#2
1 foot isn't within a foot of the ball, the foot that is is on the ground, other than that, you're spot on.
I notice none of the three ex players and ex managers who are pundits agree with the decision but i'm sure they don't have your experience
Jason Roberts said the ref was right according to the letter of the law.
by Schards#2 » 08 Jan 2012 13:24
Turns8winchester_royal Nobody likes to see a red card so early in the game, but I don't think Chris Foy had any other option. Both feet left the ground therefore it's a red. It really is as simple as that these days, and Kompany was exceptionally stupid to put the ref in that position in the first place.
It was no worse than Lamps against Wolves the other week...it's the inconsistency which is sooo annoying...but today it has ruined what was the best looking tie of the round...11 v 11 would have been a great contest as Utd would have been well up for it after the last 2 defeats.
by Schards#2 » 08 Jan 2012 13:25
TailsSchards#2
1 foot isn't within a foot of the ball, the foot that is is on the ground, other than that, you're spot on.
I notice none of the three ex players and ex managers who are pundits agree with the decision but i'm sure they don't have your experience
Inaccurate, Shards...
Reid admitted if you look at it with the letter of the law....and Chiles side it was two footed.
Nobody wanted that to happen, least of all in the first 12mins - but this isn't the terrible decision that everyone is making it out to be.
by Victor Meldrew » 08 Jan 2012 13:26
sandman Only just started watching so haven't seen the red. How the hell is Chris Foy refereeing a Manchester Derby after Monday?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 89 guests