Tony Le Mesmer West Ham have been informed that they can not take their case to the court of appeal. Can see this running and running before being settled out of court.
Deadlock West Ham have no recourse to the courts - they signed away their legal rights when they agreed to the arbitration tribunal.
And the Court of Arbitration for Sports has just said they would not be able to hear an appeal unless they had the agreement of Sheffield United (not very likely), and the FA rules allowed it. Which they don't ("the parties shall be deemed to have waived irrevocably any right to appeal, review or any recourse to a court of law").
Wycombe RoyalDeadlock West Ham have no recourse to the courts - they signed away their legal rights when they agreed to the arbitration tribunal.
And the Court of Arbitration for Sports has just said they would not be able to hear an appeal unless they had the agreement of Sheffield United (not very likely), and the FA rules allowed it. Which they don't ("the parties shall be deemed to have waived irrevocably any right to appeal, review or any recourse to a court of law").
But I don't think the Court of Arbitration for Sport is a court of law and therefore the FA rules don't come into it in terms of whether or not they can appeal.
Schards#2 West Ham should call John Madejski as a witness to confirm that you don't make any money by being in The Premiership, therefore, Sheff Utd are entitled to no compensation.
Martin Samuel Responding to the Tévez tribunal verdict, Neil Warnock, the former Sheffield United manager, said that he had a relegation season on his CV that was not down to him. Warnock is in 22nd place in the Coca-Cola Championship with Crystal Palace, so it might have had more to do with him than he is letting on, but either way, there is still one matter outstanding.
On April 26, 2007, two days before Sheffield United collected three points against Watford in the Barclays Premier League, the local newspaper, the Sheffield Star, quoted Warnock on the availability of Steve Kabba, a striker he had sold to the opposition for £500,000 in January. “Steven can’t play,” Warnock said. “I actually checked myself yesterday to make sure - you can’t afford to take any chances.”
As he is such an advocate of transparency in transfer matters, Warnock should enlighten us on who told him Kabba could not play, a fact that was also reported on the official media outlets of both clubs, and would have been illegal. Warnock could use his newspaper column to provide this information. After all, to do otherwise would suggest some form of cover-up and I am sure such a high-minded campaigner for justice would never be party to that.
6ft KerplunkMartin Samuel Responding to the Tévez tribunal verdict, Neil Warnock, the former Sheffield United manager, said that he had a relegation season on his CV that was not down to him. Warnock is in 22nd place in the Coca-Cola Championship with Crystal Palace, so it might have had more to do with him than he is letting on, but either way, there is still one matter outstanding.
On April 26, 2007, two days before Sheffield United collected three points against Watford in the Barclays Premier League, the local newspaper, the Sheffield Star, quoted Warnock on the availability of Steve Kabba, a striker he had sold to the opposition for £500,000 in January. “Steven can’t play,” Warnock said. “I actually checked myself yesterday to make sure - you can’t afford to take any chances.”
As he is such an advocate of transparency in transfer matters, Warnock should enlighten us on who told him Kabba could not play, a fact that was also reported on the official media outlets of both clubs, and would have been illegal. Warnock could use his newspaper column to provide this information. After all, to do otherwise would suggest some form of cover-up and I am sure such a high-minded campaigner for justice would never be party to that.
Martin Samuel also And I know that at the bottom of this column online there will be the inevitable posts that attribute my stance on the Tévez tribunal verdict to an allegiance to West Ham, but they miss the point. Your club scarf is handed in at the door in exchange for a press pass on your first day in this job. My view, published immediately after the Premier League commission reported, was that West Ham should not have been deducted points, but should have been relegated, if justice were to be done. I still believe that is what should have happened at the time. Scott Duxbury should no longer be an executive of the club, either.
6ft KerplunkMartin Samuel also And I know that at the bottom of this column online there will be the inevitable posts that attribute my stance on the Tévez tribunal verdict to an allegiance to West Ham, but they miss the point. Your club scarf is handed in at the door in exchange for a press pass on your first day in this job. My view, published immediately after the Premier League commission reported, was that West Ham should not have been deducted points, but should have been relegated, if justice were to be done. I still believe that is what should have happened at the time. Scott Duxbury should no longer be an executive of the club, either.
Huntley & Palmer High Court rules in favour of Sheff U over Tevez case, West Ham will not be allowed to appeal to court of arbitration for sport. OUCH
Wax Jacket6ft KerplunkMartin Samuel also And I know that at the bottom of this column online there will be the inevitable posts that attribute my stance on the Tévez tribunal verdict to an allegiance to West Ham, but they miss the point. Your club scarf is handed in at the door in exchange for a press pass on your first day in this job. My view, published immediately after the Premier League commission reported, was that West Ham should not have been deducted points, but should have been relegated, if justice were to be done. I still believe that is what should have happened at the time. Scott Duxbury should no longer be an executive of the club, either.
why keep banging on about Sheff U then? write about something else you fat prick
IdealHuntley & Palmer High Court rules in favour of Sheff U over Tevez case, West Ham will not be allowed to appeal to court of arbitration for sport. OUCH
You got an URL for that?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 103 guests
