by Seal »
21 Jun 2011 23:29
The big issue here, which I know is not "new" news to everyone, is concerning the independence if the home nations if this precedent is set. However, it is not as simple as being about the independence of the home nations to compete individually in tournaments, FIFA don't really give a toss about that, the key to this concerns the central governance of the game.
The laws that govern football (the Laws of the Game) are are maintained by the International Football Association Board (IFAB). FIFA has members on its board and the other four are provided by the home nations (i.e. England, Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland). The key significant of this is that any changes to the Laws of the Game must be agreed by at least six of the eight members, which in effect gives the home nations the right of veto over FIFA. You can imagine what FIFA think of that.
Therefore any opportunity FIFA have to change this situation would be pounced upon, so if this precedent gave them a chance to do so they would take it. If it also affected the home nations' ability to play independently then so be it.
Bearing in mind the current shenanigans at FIFA, and the fact that the guy who would probably sign any "letters of assurance" is Jerome Valcke, who has a history of screwing people over (as per the sponsors court case document I shared on the FIFA thread), you can understand the other home nations' reluctance to value the paper such a guarantee is written on.