by Ginger Ninjas » 01 Nov 2011 19:55
by LoyalRoyalFan » 01 Nov 2011 19:59
by Ferris » 02 Nov 2011 08:12
by 3 veesinarow » 02 Nov 2011 10:35
by T.R.O.L.I. » 02 Nov 2011 12:31
Ferris Well done to the ref for showing some decency and not booking him for taking his shirt off to show a message about his son when he scored.
by The Real Sandhurst Royal » 02 Nov 2011 12:44
by sandman » 02 Nov 2011 13:36
TheMaraudingDog He should have been booked to be fair. Would the ref had also let him off if he did a two footed challenge.
Rules are rules.
by bigmike » 02 Nov 2011 13:51
TheMaraudingDog He should have been booked to be fair. Would the ref had also let him off if he did a two footed challenge.
Rules are rules.
by Friday's Legacy » 02 Nov 2011 18:49
No Fixed Abode Should he have been booked for taking his shirt off and showing that message? Is that what you're talking about?
by winchester_royal » 02 Nov 2011 19:57
TheMaraudingDog :|
Thoughts go out to him and his Missus and all that but you can't go around letting people off the hook because of mitigating circumstances.
He's declared himself ok to play, respect for that but he needs to treated like anyone else on the pitch.
By not booking him last night the ref gave the opposition an unfair advantage.
Friday's LegacyNo Fixed Abode Should he have been booked for taking his shirt off and showing that message? Is that what you're talking about?
he didn't take his shirt off.
by who are ya? » 02 Nov 2011 20:21
Friday's LegacyNo Fixed Abode Should he have been booked for taking his shirt off and showing that message? Is that what you're talking about?
he didn't take his shirt off.
winchester_royalTheMaraudingDog :|
Thoughts go out to him and his Missus and all that but you can't go around letting people off the hook because of mitigating circumstances.
He's declared himself ok to play, respect for that but he needs to treated like anyone else on the pitch.
By not booking him last night the ref gave the opposition an unfair advantage.
![]()
Some things are more important than football.
by winchester_royal » 02 Nov 2011 22:31
TheMaraudingDogwinchester_royalTheMaraudingDog :|
Thoughts go out to him and his Missus and all that but you can't go around letting people off the hook because of mitigating circumstances.
He's declared himself ok to play, respect for that but he needs to treated like anyone else on the pitch.
By not booking him last night the ref gave the opposition an unfair advantage.
![]()
Some things are more important than football.
Agreed, which is why everyone would have understood if he said he couldn't play. However, the second he runs onto a football pitch to compete in a professional game what's happened in his personal life goes out of the window.
by M-U-R-T-Y » 03 Nov 2011 00:17
TheMaraudingDog :|
Thoughts go out to him and his Missus and all that but you can't go around letting people off the hook because of mitigating circumstances.
He's declared himself ok to play, respect for that but he needs to treated like anyone else on the pitch.
By not booking him last night the ref gave the opposition an unfair advantage.
by readingbedding » 03 Nov 2011 08:13
by FiNeRaIn » 03 Nov 2011 13:08
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 74 guests