by mambo3 » 12 May 2016 11:55
by linkenholtroyal » 12 May 2016 12:06
by Silver Fox » 12 May 2016 12:08
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 May 2016 12:27
by genome » 12 May 2016 12:28
by John Smith » 12 May 2016 12:52
by facaldaqui » 12 May 2016 12:54
by floyd__streete » 12 May 2016 12:57
by AthleticoSpizz » 12 May 2016 13:00
by handbags_harris » 12 May 2016 13:13
by Top Flight » 12 May 2016 13:20
facaldaqui Adkins's failure at Sheffield confirms what we thought of him here. But it raises the question of how he managed to do so well at Saints. I think it might show that often the most important thing is the state of the club rather than the talent of the manager. Southampton have done well under a succession of managers, from Pardew through Adkins and Pochettino to Koeman. It reminds me of Swansea, who have done remarkably under a succession of diverse managers, including Rodgers, who failed for us.
What has happened at Reading under Adkins, Clarke, & now Brian suggests that we are not a club that can just parachute in a manager--however good their record--and expect to improve. So long as things are muddled at the top here, no magic wand can be waved at manager level. When the top end of a club is right, maybe any half-decent manager can succeed. Look at the contrast between Leeds and Watford recently--the managers, whoever they are--succeed or fail in those clubs for reasons beyond their individual talents.
by Top Flight » 12 May 2016 13:22
handbags_harris Hard to argue for Adkins getting the sack here, but his sacking by Sheffield United raises an interesting parallel to the situation we have here and should serve as a warning to anybody associated with this club as far as I'm concerned.
It is 9 years Since Neil Warnock left Sheffield Utd after they were relegated from the Premier League, and in that time they have appointed 8 different managers. Over that time they have gone from a top end Championship club, gradually sliding down to a middle of the road League 1 club struggling to gain promotion despite the odds being stacked in their favour. The longest a manager has been in charge of them since Warnock is Kevin Blackwell, who lasted approximately 2.25 seasons but who oversaw the initiation of their demise.
Bryan Robson - May 07 - Feb 08 - 0.75 seasons
Kevin Blackwell - Feb 08 - Aug 10 - 2.25 seasons
Gary Speed - Aug 10 - Dec 10 - 0.5 seasons
Micky Adams - Dec 10 - May 11 - 0.5 seasons
Danny Wilson - May 11 - Apr 13 - 2 seasons
David Weir - Jun 13 - Oct 13 - 0.25 seasons
Nigel Clough - Oct 13 - May 15 - 1.75 seasons
Nigel Adkins - Jun 15 - May 16 - 1 season
There is a reason why Sheff Utd are languishing where they are, and that is a simple lack of continuity and patience. A couple of those managerial appointments are bizarre and doomed to failure, Bryan Robson, Micky Adams and arguably David Weir didn't have the acumen to last a regular Championship/League 1 season, but most of those managers have some success under their belts and I have no doubt that had they been given the time to build a side over around 3 seasons they would have realised their goal of promotion well before May 2017. Instead they'll be going into the 10th season since relegation with a 9th new permanent manager, which is far from a ringing endorsement of their hierarchy.
by RG7Fan » 12 May 2016 13:29
AthleticoSpizz Highest league finish in the past three seasons mind.
by Longhorn1970 » 12 May 2016 13:35
Silver Fox If anyone doubted how simple some of our fans are (at least on here)
by Top Flight » 12 May 2016 13:42
by Glory Boy » 12 May 2016 13:42
Longhorn1970Silver Fox If anyone doubted how simple some of our fans are (at least on here)
+1
by John Smith » 12 May 2016 13:52
facaldaqui Adkins's failure at Sheffield confirms what we thought of him here. But it raises the question of how he managed to do so well at Saints. I think it might show that often the most important thing is the state of the club rather than the talent of the manager. Southampton have done well under a succession of managers, from Pardew through Adkins and Pochettino to Koeman. It reminds me of Swansea, who have done remarkably under a succession of diverse managers, including Rodgers, who failed for us.
What has happened at Reading under Adkins, Clarke, & now Brian suggests that we are not a club that can just parachute in a manager--however good their record--and expect to improve. So long as things are muddled at the top here, no magic wand can be waved at manager level. When the top end of a club is right, maybe any half-decent manager can succeed. Look at the contrast between Leeds and Watford recently--the managers, whoever they are--succeed or fail in those clubs for reasons beyond their individual talents.
by Longhorn1970 » 12 May 2016 14:01
Top Flight Longhorn, you are probably the simplest fan that I have come across.
by Armadillo Roadkill » 12 May 2016 14:30
by Forbury Lion » 12 May 2016 14:45
Pardew was the catalyst at Reading, looks like he was the catalyst at Southampton..... Maybe he's the one man who can go into a club and turn things around?facaldaqui Adkins's failure at Sheffield confirms what we thought of him here. But it raises the question of how he managed to do so well at Saints. I think it might show that often the most important thing is the state of the club rather than the talent of the manager. Southampton have done well under a succession of managers, from Pardew through Adkins and Pochettino to Koeman. It reminds me of Swansea, who have done remarkably under a succession of diverse managers, including Rodgers, who failed for us.