RUMOUR - Doyle to......

[Uke]

Wasn't Marlon King part of the bling and Baby Bentley culture that Curbishley had to cull?

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-426101/Curbs-drive-Baby-Bentley-boys.html

Oops corrected

[Deathy]

It's if we sell Doyle and buy another unknown I'll be pissed!!!

Because of course spending a few million is absolutely guaranteed to get us someone better than, say, Noel Hunt.

I'm more worried about getting another Shane Long.

[Jackson Corner]

Harewood is crap I would want 10 million plus Harewood. I've never forgot him crying like a baby when Pards bought him off at the Mad stad.

[Deathy]

Harewood is crap I would want 10 million plus Harewood. I've never forgot him crying like a baby when Pards bought him off at the Mad stad.

Brought.

It's a bad day when you corrected on your spelling by me!

The thought of Doyle being worth £10m is also laughable.

[Stooper]

Harewood is crap I would want 10 million plus Harewood. I've never forgot him crying like a baby when Pards bought him off at the Mad stad.

Brought.

It's a bad day when you're corrected on your spelling by me!

The thought of Doyle being worth £10m is also laughable.

[Royal Lady]

2-Ten are running this as the big news item this afternoon. £10 million plus Harewood. But I'd rather they sold Harewood to someone else. Are we allowed to take him in January and then sell him straight on??

[Royal Rother]

Harewood. I've never forgot him crying like a baby when Pards bought him off at the Mad stad.

Don't remember that - not getting him mixed up with Micah Richards?

[The 17 Bus]

Harewood. I've never forgot him crying like a baby when Pards bought him off at the Mad stad.

Don't remember that - not getting him mixed up with Micah Richards?

Was during the 6-0 drubbing RR, Harewood was not the worst player but for some bizarre reason was taken off, good job Tevez was not put in that day.

West Ham United: Green, Dailly, Ferdinand, Gabbidon, Konchesky, Bowyer (Newton 19), Reo-Coker, Mullins, Benayoun (Cole 78), Harewood (Spector 46), Zamora. Subs Not Used: Carroll, Tevez.

[Uke]

Harewood. I've never forgot him crying like a baby when Pards bought him off at the Mad stad.

Don't remember that - not getting him mixed up with Micah Richards?

Was during the 6-0 drubbing RR, Harewood was not the worst player but for some bizarre reason was taken off, good job Tevez was not put in that day.

West Ham United: Green, Dailly, Ferdinand, Gabbidon, Konchesky, Bowyer (Newton 19), Reo-Coker, Mullins, Benayoun (Cole 78), Harewood (Spector 46), Zamora. Subs Not Used: Carroll, Tevez.

Wasn't it on another match? Only a two nil thrashing though

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 568011.stm
http://www.kumb.com/story.php?id=10382

[SCIAG]

2-Ten are running this as the big news item this afternoon. £10 million plus Harewood. But I'd rather they sold Harewood to someone else. Are we allowed to take him in January and then sell him straight on??

Yes, as long as we don't register him. We can own his registration and flog that. I think.

[Royal Lady]

Depends how much another team were willing to pay I suppose - but we might get another couple of million out of it. And to be honest, we need to be careful of the pounds these days.

[Alan Partridge]

Nugent > Harewood.

We also need to replace 'Sex tape' Lita with someone similar so 'flasher' Dave fits in.

[Deathy]

Depends how much another team were willing to pay I suppose - but we might get another couple of million out of it. And to be honest, we need to be careful of the pounds these days.

How's that?

We're not hard up. The only difference is Madejski doesn't want to put his money in any more and what we spend seems to be what the club earns. Granted, that may not be a lot without JM's support.

But to say after all the selling we've done that we need to be careful and pocket some more is a joke, surely?

[Wycombe Royal]

2-Ten are running this as the big news item this afternoon. £10 million plus Harewood. But I'd rather they sold Harewood to someone else. Are we allowed to take him in January and then sell him straight on??

Yes, as long as we don't register him. We can own his registration and flog that. I think.

If we don't register him then he is not ours to sell.

[The 17 Bus]

Why on earth would we agree to take a player that we do not want, and try to sell him on straight away?????

Keep women out of football, that's what I say.

[Matt de K]

10 million PLUS Harewood??? This is geting like a chinese whisper...

[Uke]

10 million PLUS Harewood??? This is geting like a chinese whisper...

Doyle's agent's Chinese?

[Royal Lady]

Depends how much another team were willing to pay I suppose - but we might get another couple of million out of it. And to be honest, we need to be careful of the pounds these days.

How's that?

We're not hard up. The only difference is Madejski doesn't want to put his money in any more and what we spend seems to be what the club earns. Granted, that may not be a lot without JM's support.

But to say after all the selling we've done that we need to be careful and pocket some more is a joke, surely?

I was being sarcastic.

[Royal Lady]

Why on earth would we agree to take a player that we do not want, and try to sell him on straight away?????

Keep women out of football, that's what I say.

Gosh, I don't know - but seeing as I'm seemingly not in "iggy" - how about we get £10 million for Doyle and that's Villa's top whack - but they'll also throw in Harewood if we want him. Do we say "no thanks" and just take £10 million or do we say "oh go on then" and take £10 million plus a player which we can sell on for probably a couple of million. Even if we waited until the Summer transfer window? It's a toughie isn't it?

[Matt de K]

Given the option, if you were Harewood, would you rather stay at a club and get paid well, or move clubs and take a massive pay cut but maybe play more 1st team football?

Here lays the first hurdle in this ridiculous rumour

Secondly, I imagine Harewood to have a bit of a Lita (brrrap brrrap brrrap) attitude. Coppell would love that