by Jerry St Clair » 08 Nov 2007 07:51
by Dirk Gently » 08 Nov 2007 08:03
by Jerry St Clair » 08 Nov 2007 09:04
by readingbedding » 08 Nov 2007 09:30
by Behindu » 08 Nov 2007 09:51
by The 17 Bus » 08 Nov 2007 10:14
Behindu Wasn't the critical comment from thre first edition of Inglis' book and by the second edition he had changed his mind a bit...
He came and gave a talk at the club once and was incredibly interesting and very knowledgeable.
I would think that if STAR were able to arrange a repeat of this there would be quite a lot of interest.....
by Behindu » 08 Nov 2007 10:17
The 17 BusBehindu Wasn't the critical comment from thre first edition of Inglis' book and by the second edition he had changed his mind a bit...
He came and gave a talk at the club once and was incredibly interesting and very knowledgeable.
I would think that if STAR were able to arrange a repeat of this there would be quite a lot of interest.....
Does he talks on stadium expansions?
by Jerry St Clair » 08 Nov 2007 10:22
Behindu I'm sure he would, if the demand was there.
by Dai Brainbocs » 08 Nov 2007 11:24
by Dirk Gently » 08 Nov 2007 11:30
In the 1983 edition of this book, I described Elm Park as the least interesting ground in the League. Not much has changed except for it appearing brighter, and perhaps moderately appealing as a post-Taylor relic, in the run-up to its 100th birthday.
by Dirk Gently » 08 Nov 2007 11:33
by Whistle » 08 Nov 2007 12:57
by readingbedding » 08 Nov 2007 15:06
Whistle There's nothing about the main stand at EP that looks like any Leitch work I know of.
It was probably done on the cheap - I think it was mainly benches rather than tip up seats to start with.
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 09 Nov 2007 12:34
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 09 Nov 2007 12:49
I always though it was the main stand that let elm park down. It was small and dull, and out of scale with the rest of the ground. Given the size of the terraces, Elm Park should have had a stand with at least 5000 seats.Mad Dog's Ghost I like Simon Inglis's work but his assessment of Elm Park was very harsh. No other terrace shaped quite like the Tilehurst End, Southbank offered a good view, shelter (and atmosphere, on its day/evening) and the Norfolk Road Stand was a 20s(?) classic, again with good views and decent capacity.
And in its later days, it had proper floodlights on damn great pylons which you could see from miles. You don't get 'em like that any more.
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 09 Nov 2007 13:09
by Winchester Royal » 09 Nov 2007 16:25
Mad Dog's Ghost It still held over 3,000 though ... until the embarrassing 'executive' boxes were added. They were awful.
by Dirk Gently » 09 Nov 2007 16:42
Mad Dog's Ghost It still held over 3,000 though ... until the embarrassing 'executive' boxes were added. They were awful.
by Jerry St Clair » 09 Nov 2007 18:01
Winchester Royal After the Taylor report, they had to remove the last 8(?) rows of seats because the stand wouldn't have been able to be evacuated quickly enough.
by RoyalBlue » 09 Nov 2007 18:51
Mad Dog's Ghost Used to have a freebie season ticket in 'A' stand (before it became an 'away' section) through my junior sunday side and loved it. The only other people in there were very senior supporters who all seemed to smoke pipes or cigars. I like Simon Inglis's work but his assessment of Elm Park was very harsh. No other terrace shaped quite like the Tilehurst End, Southbank offered a good view, shelter (and atmosphere, on its day/evening) and the Norfolk Road Stand was a 20s(?) classic, again with good views and decent capacity.
And in its later days, it had proper floodlights on damn great pylons which you could see from miles. You don't get 'em like that any more.
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 146 guests