by The 17 Bus » 15 Nov 2007 10:47
by sheshnu » 15 Nov 2007 10:50
by Behindu » 15 Nov 2007 10:50
by Jerry St Clair » 15 Nov 2007 10:54
sheshnu Far more likely to renew if Reading are relegated and prices are reduced than if the team are still in the Prem and prices remain the same or increase.
by The 17 Bus » 15 Nov 2007 11:00
Jerry St Clairsheshnu Far more likely to renew if Reading are relegated and prices are reduced than if the team are still in the Prem and prices remain the same or increase.
Agreed.
£20 per game is the threshold for me.
by TFF » 15 Nov 2007 11:02
Behindu Obvioulsy I'd renew and I'd pay whatever the price was.
by Huntley & Palmer » 15 Nov 2007 11:13
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 11:21
by Dirk Gently » 15 Nov 2007 11:28
by Behindu » 15 Nov 2007 11:29
Schards#2 I'll renew whatever the price but, if the club still hasn't spent any of it's premiership treasure trove, I think they should follow the example of Charlton and offer a huge deal to renewing season ticket holders.
I suspect they'll be £425 odd though and less than 66% will renew as a result.
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 11:35
BehinduSchards#2 I'll renew whatever the price but, if the club still hasn't spent any of it's premiership treasure trove, I think they should follow the example of Charlton and offer a huge deal to renewing season ticket holders.
I suspect they'll be £425 odd though and less than 66% will renew as a result.
12k+ STH would be a pretty good retention rate, crowds would still be up around the 20k mark most weeks assuming we were competitive on the pitch.
by Behindu » 15 Nov 2007 11:37
Schards#2BehinduSchards#2 I'll renew whatever the price but, if the club still hasn't spent any of it's premiership treasure trove, I think they should follow the example of Charlton and offer a huge deal to renewing season ticket holders.
I suspect they'll be £425 odd though and less than 66% will renew as a result.
12k+ STH would be a pretty good retention rate, crowds would still be up around the 20k mark most weeks assuming we were competitive on the pitch.
Just the 10,000 empty seats then.
by Dirk Gently » 15 Nov 2007 11:38
by Huntley & Palmer » 15 Nov 2007 11:38
Schards#2BehinduSchards#2 I'll renew whatever the price but, if the club still hasn't spent any of it's premiership treasure trove, I think they should follow the example of Charlton and offer a huge deal to renewing season ticket holders.
I suspect they'll be £425 odd though and less than 66% will renew as a result.
12k+ STH would be a pretty good retention rate, crowds would still be up around the 20k mark most weeks assuming we were competitive on the pitch.
Just the 10,000 empty seats then.
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 11:41
BehinduSchards#2BehinduSchards#2 I'll renew whatever the price but, if the club still hasn't spent any of it's premiership treasure trove, I think they should follow the example of Charlton and offer a huge deal to renewing season ticket holders.
I suspect they'll be £425 odd though and less than 66% will renew as a result.
12k+ STH would be a pretty good retention rate, crowds would still be up around the 20k mark most weeks assuming we were competitive on the pitch.
Just the 10,000 empty seats then.
No
20k crowds would leave 4k empty seats. The maths ain't tricky mate....
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 11:51
BehinduSchards#2 Sorry, I thought you were advocating an extention to 30,000.
30,000 - 20,000 = 10,000
Glad you've finally seen sense
No, those of us with a consistent and logical approach to the extension have always advised that if our Premiership status looks at risk it would need to be reconsidered.
You have taken a different approach![]()
24,000 - 2,000 - 12,000 - 6,000 = 4,000
Capacity - away fans - STH - match sales = spare capacity
There has been no argument presented that dents the logic of the extension if Premiership status is preserved.
by Dirk Gently » 15 Nov 2007 11:53
Schards#2 Why do you not consider my approach, (which has always been to wait until the end of the season and make a decision based on where we are and what the demand has been over the previous season), consistent or logical?
by Schards#2 » 15 Nov 2007 11:59
Dirk GentlySchards#2 Why do you not consider my approach, (which has always been to wait until the end of the season and make a decision based on where we are and what the demand has been over the previous season), consistent or logical?
Because with the time and cost required before building work can take place, a decision really has to be made mid-season. A decision taken at the end of this season would be as valid as a decision taken at the end of last season.
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 140 guests