Slightly Hungover If you'd ever been to school you would know
That the words that you've just sung do not go
Try again you illiterate collective
What you've sung's a double negative
If you'd ever been to school then you would know

by Rawlie19 » 28 Jan 2009 13:23
Slightly Hungover If you'd ever been to school you would know
That the words that you've just sung do not go
Try again you illiterate collective
What you've sung's a double negative
If you'd ever been to school then you would know
by loyalroyal4life » 28 Jan 2009 13:24
by papereyes » 28 Jan 2009 13:24
Alan Partridge
To be fair mate I did them a disservice as I wasn't aware that Wolves actually did the double in 1988....
Division 4 title AND the Sherpa Vans Trophy
by Arthur Pint » 28 Jan 2009 13:25
by who are ya? » 28 Jan 2009 13:38
Arthur Pint Would be nice to have a chant about the 106 point season too
Something along the lines of - "You'll never get one oh six" -in response to all those "We are top of the league" chants, apologies if this doesn't fit I know nothing about chants
by Focher » 28 Jan 2009 13:42
by readingbedding » 28 Jan 2009 13:43
by The Cube » 28 Jan 2009 13:57
Focher to the tune of 'you're so loud you sound like Aldershot'
"we have won the Berks Bucks & Oxon, clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap clap"
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 28 Jan 2009 14:08
by SteveRoyal » 28 Jan 2009 14:11
by readingbedding » 28 Jan 2009 14:14
by SpaceCruiser » 28 Jan 2009 14:16
Tommy Youlden's Ears Listened to 606 on drive home last night. Danny Baker had a thought going; if some fascist dictator decreed that there could only be 20 clubs in Britain, and that they had to define some sort of characteristic of the game, then what would your team represent. He started by saying that Man Utd would be in representing success/glamour/arrogance/money etc.
Some people offered things like PNE and Huddersfield for ancient success. First double. First to win three consecutive titles etc. He rejected this as non-representative. Not about records, but what you are. He preferred Lincoln City's claim to be eternal losers -bankruptcy, manager arrested 5 mins before a game, first team relegated from league. First to lose to a golden goal etc.
So what would we be? I think we struggle a bit to sound uniquely....anything.
Could go for the somewhat self deprecating... The most quaintly middle class? The most businesslike? I mean Waitrose as shirt sponsor...beats Delia.
by watfordroyal » 28 Jan 2009 14:17
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 28 Jan 2009 14:19
watfordroyal 1-0h-6 Ma Lord, 1-0h-6,
1-0h-6 Ma Lord, 1-0h-6,
1-0h-6 Ma Lord, 1-0h-6,
Oh Lord 1-0h-6!
by Horsham Royal » 28 Jan 2009 14:31
by Once were Biscuitmen » 28 Jan 2009 14:31
Slightly Hungover Always makes me smile when opposition fans sing this at us given that it's a double negative so, in fact, they are implying we've won lots of things.
Despite wracking my brains, I've yet to think of a witty reply though. Can't imagine singing 'That's a double negative...' to have much of an impact. Any ideas?
by Horsham Royal » 28 Jan 2009 14:36
Once were Biscuitmen As English grammar does not take its rule directly from mathematics this is fact completely fine. What the speakers are doing is actually emphasizing the negative, there is no rule against it.
Although in this specific case they are probably far too thick to realize they are quite correct...
by Terminal Boardom » 28 Jan 2009 14:43
Slightly Hungover Always makes me smile when opposition fans sing this at us given that it's a double negative so, in fact, they are implying we've won lots of things.
Despite wracking my brains, I've yet to think of a witty reply though. Can't imagine singing 'That's a double negative...' to have much of an impact. Any ideas?
by facaldaqui » 28 Jan 2009 14:45
by SpaceCruiser » 28 Jan 2009 14:46
Once were BiscuitmenSlightly Hungover Always makes me smile when opposition fans sing this at us given that it's a double negative so, in fact, they are implying we've won lots of things.
Despite wracking my brains, I've yet to think of a witty reply though. Can't imagine singing 'That's a double negative...' to have much of an impact. Any ideas?
As English grammar does not take its rule directly from mathematics this is fact completely fine. What the speakers are doing is actually emphasizing the negative, there is no rule against it.
Although in this specific case they are probably far too thick to realize they are quite correct...
Users browsing this forum: Jammy Dodger, Majestic-12 [Bot], Number 9 and 441 guests