by readingbedding » 29 Jan 2009 12:41
TBMboy1985 LOl @ putting european cup and cup winners cup under the same heading! Surely inter two bob cup counts as european winners too then?
Winning the inter-toto cup is just a route into the UEFA Cup
Winning the Cup Winners Cup was just like winning the UEFA Cup
1 European cup win in 1982 DOESN'T make Aston Villa a bigger club than Arsenal. Infact the last time Villa won something was 1996 (13 years ago) and that was the league cup, since then Arsenal have won 3 top division titles and 4 FA Cups/
So you're either on the wind up or its LOL @ You
by papereyes » 29 Jan 2009 13:09
To be honest there is only 2 'big' clubs in England anyway IMO
papereyesTo be honest there is only 2 'big' clubs in England anyway IMO
You could possibly make an argument for 3, but yeah, that's about it.
Then there's some currently successful clubs and then some clubs that were successful once and then a whole host of clubs that have never been successful.
by papereyes » 29 Jan 2009 13:28
papereyes I think you could make a good argument for Arsenal on the basis of historical success in the league and in the FA cup (second most wins, iirc).
I also think you could make an argument for Chelsea, solely on recent successes, profile and cash. It's not as good an argument, but its there. If anything, they're who I'm thinking of as 'currently successful' - before Abramovich, they were little more than a London-based Villa.
However, I think they're both playing for 3rd place behind Manchester United and Liverpool.
by papereyes » 29 Jan 2009 13:56
papereyes Spacey. Has.
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Jan 2009 14:02
by papereyes » 29 Jan 2009 14:03
SpaceCruiser Well, you might remember I did a database that calculated the rankings of the most successful clubs in England (and Wales). This is the top 20 from it. Reading is not in it, unfortunately.
1 Liverpool
2 Manchester United
3 Arsenal
4 Aston Villa
5 Everton
6 Tottenham Hotspur
7 Newcastle United
8 Sunderland
9 Manchester City
10 Blackburn Rovers
11 Chelsea
12 Sheffield Wednesday
13 West Bromwich Albion
14 Nottingham Forest
15 Wolverhampton Wanderers
16 Derby County
17 Bolton Wanderers
18 Sheffield United
19 Preston North End
20 Burnley
papereyesSpaceCruiser Well, you might remember I did a database that calculated the rankings of the most successful clubs in England (and Wales). This is the top 20 from it. Reading is not in it, unfortunately.
1 Liverpool
2 Manchester United
3 Arsenal
4 Aston Villa
5 Everton
6 Tottenham Hotspur
7 Newcastle United
8 Sunderland
9 Manchester City
10 Blackburn Rovers
11 Chelsea
12 Sheffield Wednesday
13 West Bromwich Albion
14 Nottingham Forest
15 Wolverhampton Wanderers
16 Derby County
17 Bolton Wanderers
18 Sheffield United
19 Preston North End
20 Burnley
Thread here --> viewtopic.php?f=3&t=78253&st=0&sk=t&sd=a&hilit=most+successful+clubs+in+England
by papereyes » 29 Jan 2009 14:11
papereyes Just in my lifetime (late 80s onwards) Arsenal have always been there or thereabouts.
Whether it be the George Graham side of 1988-90, the European and cup runs of the early-to-mid 90s, the league title in 98, another cup side at the turn of the millenium (UEFA cup final? FA cup finals, iirc), then the second Arsenal league winning side.
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Jan 2009 14:28
by TBM » 29 Jan 2009 14:42
boy1985 Villa have won the European cup meaning that at some point they would have been regarded as the best team around, Arsenal can not say that.
by who are ya? » 29 Jan 2009 14:53
LoyalRoyalFan What about West Ham?
They have a large fanbase.
TBMboy1985 Villa have won the European cup meaning that at some point they would have been regarded as the best team around, Arsenal can not say that.
Im sorry but what the fcuk are you chatting about?
Going by your statement surely Nottingham Forest should be above Aston Villa, Arsenal AND Chelsea simply because they have won the European Cup twice......
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Jan 2009 15:04
TBMboy1985 Villa have won the European cup meaning that at some point they would have been regarded as the best team around, Arsenal can not say that.
Im sorry but what the fcuk are you chatting about?
Going by your statement surely Nottingham Forest should be above Aston Villa, Arsenal AND Chelsea simply because they have won the European Cup twice......
by TBM » 29 Jan 2009 15:06
SpaceCruiserTBMboy1985 Villa have won the European cup meaning that at some point they would have been regarded as the best team around, Arsenal can not say that.
Im sorry but what the fcuk are you chatting about?
Going by your statement surely Nottingham Forest should be above Aston Villa, Arsenal AND Chelsea simply because they have won the European Cup twice......
Well, Villa and Forest have been champions of Europe whereas Arsenal have NEVER () been champions of Europe. Surely, being champions of Europe is the highest (with exception of the World Club Cup) that a club could aspire to?
by The 17 Bus » 30 Jan 2009 09:19
Users browsing this forum: Vision and 100 guests