by Starfish » 30 Jun 2009 11:47
by papereyes » 30 Jun 2009 11:49
Though, I wonder if Pearce really did have the options to select more forwards for the tournament. And remember, Arsenal weren't keen on Walcott going in the first place. Who else could Pearce have selected?
But in the past, England underage teams failed to qualify for tournaments or didn't do that well and most football fans were not aware there was even a competition taking place or who the manager was. There was a lot of media excitement around this team (and rightly so), they made the final ... and now there are people demanding the manager's head. Laughable.
by sheshnu » 30 Jun 2009 11:50
Hoop Blah Not many on the U21's really go on to play regularly for the senior team, a handful per generation perhaps.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2009 11:53
Thaumagurist*Hoop BlahCompo's Hat Stuart Pearce just isn't that good a manager.
Totally agree, how he's even been mentioned as a future England manager I don't know.
I thought the scoreline flattered the Germans a little last night, although we never really cut them open because he had nothing upfront. Shows the importance of having enough options within your squad though. Going with so few forwards was just naive.
Agree with your comments about scoreline flattering the Germans and what we had up front.
Though, I wonder if Pearce really did have the options to select more forwards for the tournament. And remember, Arsenal weren't keen on Walcott going in the first place. Who else could Pearce have selected?
by Thaumagurist* » 30 Jun 2009 11:54
papereyes Agbonlahor was suspended, wasn't he?
papereyes I thought England's main issue was that the centre-midfield was utterly devoid of spark. Germany used the ball much, much better and then punished the England side as they chased the game in the last 10 minutes.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2009 11:56
Starfish Pearce is, despite what a lot of you are saying, a much improved manager in comparison to what he was at Man City. And this U-21 team did play some decent football in this tournament (especially in the earlier games). He didn't seem to have that many ideas about how to change the game last night when England went 2 down but they were more than a bit unfortunate to find themselves in that position. No manager could have foreseen the second goal, for example. They got to the final of a European competition and looked very very tired in the last half an hour - I am not sure how tiring a season most of the German players had behind them, but they certainly looked fresher. But in the past, England underage teams failed to qualify for tournaments or didn't do that well and most football fans were not aware there was even a competition taking place or who the manager was. There was a lot of media excitement around this team (and rightly so), they made the final ... and now there are people demanding the manager's head. Laughable.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2009 11:58
sheshnuHoop Blah Not many on the U21's really go on to play regularly for the senior team, a handful per generation perhaps.
Pretty much all of the current England squad played for the U21s.
by papereyes » 30 Jun 2009 12:00
by Royal Rother » 30 Jun 2009 12:08
boy1985 out of the squad i'd say Richards, Hart, Walcott, Agbonlahor and Milner will probably go onto feature in the first team quite a bit.
by Royal Rother » 30 Jun 2009 12:18
by Thaumagurist* » 30 Jun 2009 12:21
Royal Rotherboy1985 out of the squad i'd say Richards, Hart, Walcott, Agbonlahor and Milner will probably go onto feature in the first team quite a bit.
God help us then.
Interesting that in the U17s Euros earlier this year we were beaten by Germany - score? 4-0.
Gerrard, Lampard & Co could be our golden generation. As I said, God help us.
by Hoop Blah » 30 Jun 2009 13:49
Royal Rother I've probably moaned about this before but what I found so irritating last night was that the passing was almost always to feet. When we were knocking it around at the back, or just inside their half, we often had men in 10 yards of space, yet we almost always passed the ball to their feet, not in front of them by a couple of yards. Consequently we found it so difficult to get any momentum going forward as everything had to be created from a virtual standing start.
Whenever we did receive the ball in anything other than yards of space we just passed it back to the bloke who'd made the pass in the first place.
There just seems to be no confidence in English players that they can do anything remotely constructive with the ball if an opponent is in (or anywhere close to) their face.
As I've said many times before, it's just so one dimensional. Pretty much summed up Reading last year as well.
by Royal Rother » 30 Jun 2009 16:22
Thaumagurist*Royal Rotherboy1985 out of the squad i'd say Richards, Hart, Walcott, Agbonlahor and Milner will probably go onto feature in the first team quite a bit.
God help us then.
Interesting that in the U17s Euros earlier this year we were beaten by Germany - score? 4-0.
Gerrard, Lampard & Co could be our golden generation. As I said, God help us.
So unrelentlessly negative as usual, Mr Royal "I believe in Solipsism" Rother.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests