by Deadlock » 15 Sep 2009 00:45
by Dirk Gently » 15 Sep 2009 08:02
by Stranded » 15 Sep 2009 08:17
Ideal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 15 Sep 2009 08:45
by handbags_harris » 15 Sep 2009 10:09
Ideal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
by TFF » 15 Sep 2009 10:13
handbags_harrisIdeal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
Very true on the latter aspect. It could be you in a similar situation though mate. I don't know what the laws are like in Scandinavia, but back home it is very easy to get a prison sentence through a simple act of negligence behind the wheel of a car whether it involves drinking, drugs, or nothing at all. If that happens to you, you'll change your view.
I'd also quite like to know how you feel Hughes is a menace to society.
by papereyes » 15 Sep 2009 10:15
by handbags_harris » 15 Sep 2009 10:16
That Friday Feelinghandbags_harrisIdeal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
Very true on the latter aspect. It could be you in a similar situation though mate. I don't know what the laws are like in Scandinavia, but back home it is very easy to get a prison sentence through a simple act of negligence behind the wheel of a car whether it involves drinking, drugs, or nothing at all. If that happens to you, you'll change your view.
I'd also quite like to know how you feel Hughes is a menace to society.
There's a whole new argument.
by Silver Fox » 15 Sep 2009 10:49
StrandedIdeal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
So, and this is purely hypothetical here - you open a door of a building, as you open the door it hits somebody on the street on the head, this knocks them unsteday causing them to lose their balance, fall, crack their head on the curb and die. Would that make you a killer?
by Stranded » 15 Sep 2009 11:02
Silver FoxStrandedIdeal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
So, and this is purely hypothetical here - you open a door of a building, as you open the door it hits somebody on the street on the head, this knocks them unsteday causing them to lose their balance, fall, crack their head on the curb and die. Would that make you a killer?
That all depends, what's your job? Does it involve a silly dance?
by Silver Fox » 15 Sep 2009 11:51
by dean horrix legend » 15 Sep 2009 12:01
StrandedIdeal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
So, and this is purely hypothetical here - you open a door of a building, as you open the door it hits somebody on the street on the head, this knocks them unsteday causing them to lose their balance, fall, crack their head on the curb and die. Would that make you a killer?
by Stranded » 15 Sep 2009 12:05
dean horrix legendStrandedIdeal That's just semantics, he's a killer, no matter how he did it he caused it to happen and four children no longer have a father.
So, and this is purely hypothetical here - you open a door of a building, as you open the door it hits somebody on the street on the head, this knocks them unsteday causing them to lose their balance, fall, crack their head on the curb and die. Would that make you a killer?
No,that would be an accident and I don't think anyone doing that is likely to flee the scene.
Lee Hughes did flee the scene,despite knowing there were injured people involved,so yes I think he is a killer.However,he has done his time and should be able to get on with his life.
by Zammo » 15 Sep 2009 12:23
by Archie's penalty » 15 Sep 2009 12:33
Zammo I totally agree with the original poster. Whether he served the correct time in prison is beside the point. Footballers are role models and the fact that he should be dancing away after scoring goals makes my blood boil. The family members of the deceased must be shaking their heads in disbelief.
by Zammo » 15 Sep 2009 12:37
by Stranded » 15 Sep 2009 12:42
by Archie's penalty » 15 Sep 2009 12:49
Zammo Just show some respect. The fact that anyone is questioning that point is a sad reflection on the world we live in.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 15 Sep 2009 16:55
Zammo I totally agree with the original poster. Whether he served the correct time in prison is beside the point. Footballers are role models and the fact that he should be dancing away after scoring goals makes my blood boil. The family members of the deceased must be shaking their heads in disbelief.
by LoyalRoyalFan » 15 Sep 2009 16:56
Nick Shorey my Lord! I'm still waiting for Loyalroyals explanation on what released prisoners allowed professions are. Tea bag makers? Willow basket weavers?
He did the crime, he's served the time (in line with standard UK criminal justice laws/guidelines) and he's earning a wage (and thus paying "his way"). He doesn't play for Reading.
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs and 56 guests