Chelsea transfer ban

Terminal Boardom
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7791
Joined: 15 Aug 2008 19:50
Location: No more egodome until the daft old coot leaves

Re: Chelsea transfer ban

by Terminal Boardom » 05 Feb 2010 12:33

No Fixed Abode The contract between Lens and Kakuta wasn't vaLOLid.


Isn't that a Spanish team?

No Fixed Abode

Re: Chelsea transfer ban

by No Fixed Abode » 05 Feb 2010 14:11

Toon Toon Blue army What was the actual point in giving them the ban anyway, it was obvious it would be uplifted. Pathetic.


It does send out a message to other clubs that tapping up won't be tolerated and they used Chelsea as an example to keep it high profile. Imagine if they had done the same to Reading when they tapped up Coppell. It wouldn't have had the same impact.

No Fixed Abode

Re: Chelsea transfer ban

by No Fixed Abode » 07 Feb 2010 03:44

No Fixed Abode
Toon Toon Blue army What was the actual point in giving them the ban anyway, it was obvious it would be uplifted. Pathetic.


It does send out a message to other clubs that tapping up won't be tolerated and they used Chelsea as an example to keep it high profile. Imagine if they had done the same to Reading when they tapped up Coppell. It wouldn't have had the same impact.


agreed

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Chelsea transfer ban

by Royal With Cheese » 07 Feb 2010 10:13

No Fixed Abode
Toon Toon Blue army What was the actual point in giving them the ban anyway, it was obvious it would be uplifted. Pathetic.


It does send out a message to other clubs that tapping up won't be tolerated and they used Chelsea as an example to keep it high profile. Imagine if they had done the same to Reading when they tapped up Coppell. It wouldn't have had the same impact.

I see what you did there.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 45 guests

It is currently 24 Aug 2025 21:14