but you can't say the Mexicans were better than us if they still failed to beat us.
No-one did.

by papereyes » 25 May 2010 11:01
but you can't say the Mexicans were better than us if they still failed to beat us.
by Hoop Blah » 25 May 2010 11:18
papereyesbut you can't say the Mexicans were better than us if they still failed to beat us.
No-one did.
by Maguire » 25 May 2010 11:19
by Tails » 25 May 2010 11:30
by TBM » 25 May 2010 11:33
Tredder I didn't realise Baines was English, he's much better than Bridge anyway, no great loss
by Big Foot » 25 May 2010 11:36
by Ian Royal » 25 May 2010 12:32
by readingbedding » 25 May 2010 12:40
by Stranded » 25 May 2010 12:43
Ian Royal King was awful, we fluked a win with goals a better team wouldn't have let us get a sniff of.
We also would have been punished a lot more by a better team.
by TBM » 25 May 2010 12:44
by Big Foot » 25 May 2010 13:00
StrandedIan Royal King was awful, we fluked a win with goals a better team wouldn't have let us get a sniff of.
We also would have been punished a lot more by a better team.
True but there is no way we will start a game at the WC with a starting XI of:
Green, Johnson, Ferdinand, King, Baines, Walcott, Milner, Carrick, Gerrard, Crouch, Rooney
So as a fixture it was fairly pointless.
by Zammo » 25 May 2010 13:05
Big FootStrandedIan Royal King was awful, we fluked a win with goals a better team wouldn't have let us get a sniff of.
We also would have been punished a lot more by a better team.
True but there is no way we will start a game at the WC with a starting XI of:
Green, Johnson, Ferdinand, King, Baines, Walcott, Milner, Carrick, Gerrard, Crouch, Rooney
So as a fixture it was fairly pointless.
King completes 90 minutes, Green makes a few top drawer saves, Milner impresses again in an England shirt, Rooney plays 90 mins, both Johnsons and Lennon impress - not quite as pointless as some would believe.
by Muskrat » 25 May 2010 13:27
by Stranded » 25 May 2010 13:30
Big FootStrandedIan Royal King was awful, we fluked a win with goals a better team wouldn't have let us get a sniff of.
We also would have been punished a lot more by a better team.
True but there is no way we will start a game at the WC with a starting XI of:
Green, Johnson, Ferdinand, King, Baines, Walcott, Milner, Carrick, Gerrard, Crouch, Rooney
So as a fixture it was fairly pointless.
King completes 90 minutes, Green makes a few top drawer saves, Milner impresses again in an England shirt, Rooney plays 90 mins, both Johnsons and Lennon impress - not quite as pointless as some would believe.
by papereyes » 25 May 2010 13:37
by T.R.O.L.I. » 25 May 2010 13:43
Stranded We knoe King can play 90 mins - problem is can he play 90mins 4 or 5 times in a few weeks.
by Seal » 25 May 2010 13:53
by Hoop Blah » 25 May 2010 14:03
by FiNeRaIn » 25 May 2010 14:21
by Hoop Blah » 25 May 2010 14:33
FiNeRaIn I thought we looked much better with Johnson and Lennon on, even if it was for like 10 mins max. Why wasn't johnson on way earlier?
As a whole though, poor performance and very lucky for a 3-1 win.
Users browsing this forum: Vision and 77 guests