James Henry

pea
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 07 Mar 2009 16:16
Location: brighton

Re: James Henry

by pea » 06 Dec 2010 19:49

Well he's had more of an effect this season than Henry did in his whole time with us and was clearly the better of the two in league one last season.

Big Foot
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8336
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 15:19
Location: #MagicOfTheCup #RoadToWembley

Re: James Henry

by Big Foot » 06 Dec 2010 23:12

gazzer, loyal royal his dad, who is also his agent, thought James was beyond where he actually was and subsequently told him so. hence his attitude problem!

And you know that for confirmed fact?

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: James Henry

by Hoop Blah » 07 Dec 2010 08:54

Ian Royal Henry was the wrong type of winger for the way we've been trying to play. He was very much a Coppell winger - stay wide and get good crosses into the box for strikers to attack and head in. Under Rodgers & Mcdermott it's been much more about cutting inside or pull backs - hence why Kebe has started to shine, it's what he does best.

He'd be an excellent winger to have alongside Long & Hunt IMO. Both good at attacking crosses and he can chip in with a few goals too.

McAnuff & Kebe are both better though.

West Ham will be keeping track on him for next season at this level.


Certainly he's more of a technical player than a runner or athlete like Kebe, Kanu or Antonio but he was still a winger who could come off the wing, get involved, run at centre backs, support the loan forward and most importantly score goals. Oddly enough he played on the left for Millwall on Saturday and did exactly that.

During his time at Reading he also played upfront and in the hole too, so not sure I agree he was the wrong type, apart from not being a runner.

Tony Le Mesmer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3404
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 20:37
Location: Dundee in my bare feet

Re: James Henry

by Tony Le Mesmer » 07 Dec 2010 09:15

1st goal for 13 months, been off the radar since August. Thats why we let him go.

User avatar
Harpers So Solid Crew
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5273
Joined: 06 Jul 2004 08:39
Location: enjoying the money

Re: James Henry

by Harpers So Solid Crew » 07 Dec 2010 09:52

A goal in open play, sign him up.


26-10-06
Member
Posts: 550
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 20:11

Re: James Henry

by 26-10-06 » 07 Dec 2010 10:18

Mentioned in the Gossip section on the BBC that Wigan, West Ham and Stoke are monitoring him. Must be doing something right!

Plymouth_Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1143
Joined: 03 Aug 2008 13:53
Location: Location, Location.

Re: James Henry

by Plymouth_Royal » 07 Dec 2010 11:34

Ian Royal
pea One of about three players on the pitch on Saturday who looked championship quality but still faded at times. Great goal but its his first this season and he's got a decent amount of assists until you realise half of them came in one match.

Antonio, Kebe and McAnuff are all better and I'd have played sig on the wing ahead of Henry at the time we sold him too. Still, hope he does well and we receive a Cox-sized sell on fee in a few years.


really :shock:


Not totally convinced by antonio yet. He's quick, a bit unorthodox and strong, but he has the touch of a rapist and when opposing teams figure out his game i'm not sure he has the skill or brain to combat that.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: James Henry

by ZacNaloen » 07 Dec 2010 12:13

I'm not convinced even Antonio knows his game, he makes it up as he goes along.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: James Henry

by Ian Royal » 08 Dec 2010 00:01

Plymouth_Royal
Ian Royal
pea One of about three players on the pitch on Saturday who looked championship quality but still faded at times. Great goal but its his first this season and he's got a decent amount of assists until you realise half of them came in one match.

Antonio, Kebe and McAnuff are all better and I'd have played sig on the wing ahead of Henry at the time we sold him too. Still, hope he does well and we receive a Cox-sized sell on fee in a few years.


really :shock:


Not totally convinced by antonio yet. He's quick, a bit unorthodox and strong, but he has the touch of a rapist and when opposing teams figure out his game i'm not sure he has the skill or brain to combat that.


Reminds me of Bas Savage, but with some actual quality as well.


User avatar
prostak
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1047
Joined: 14 Aug 2008 10:28

Re: James Henry

by prostak » 08 Dec 2010 00:09

Ian Royal Reminds me of Bas Savage



User avatar
Mike Hunt
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2812
Joined: 01 Jul 2008 08:24
Location: Blue and White

Re: James Henry

by Mike Hunt » 08 Dec 2010 01:24

Big Foot
gazzer, loyal royal his dad, who is also his agent, thought James was beyond where he actually was and subsequently told him so. hence his attitude problem!

And you know that for confirmed fact?


If you frequent UR&G, you will know that gazzer is legit.

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: James Henry

by Royal With Cheese » 08 Dec 2010 08:49

prostak
Ian Royal Reminds me of Bas Savage



Absolutely.

They're both black.

User avatar
Ferris
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1510
Joined: 26 Sep 2008 10:58

Re: James Henry

by Ferris » 08 Dec 2010 09:48

Mike Hunt
Big Foot
gazzer, loyal royal his dad, who is also his agent, thought James was beyond where he actually was and subsequently told him so. hence his attitude problem!

And you know that for confirmed fact?


If you frequent UR&G, you will know that gazzer is legit.


Too legit to quit.


User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: James Henry

by Hoop Blah » 08 Dec 2010 10:04

That may well be the common view within the club, it doesn't mean that it's the truth in Henry's head though.

As ever there are probably two sides of the story, with the truth nestled somewhere in the middle. As with Cox before him I think Henry deserved a bit more of a chance in the first team, but if there were issues the club had with him off the pitch that might explain those lack of extended chances.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: James Henry

by brendywendy » 08 Dec 2010 10:40

like cox, henry was just not good enough for what we needed, when we needed it.
we all get emotionally attached people get to our players-epecially our yoof prospects- im just glad someone else has to make the decisions to let players go/stay

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: James Henry

by Hoop Blah » 08 Dec 2010 11:19

Obviously I disagree in both these cases and have said so many times in the case of Cox. When we needed something a little bit different he could've offered that and wasn't given a go, despite those in the side failing and Cox looking impressive on a couple of occassions. You don't have to be good enough (long term or short term) to be a catalyst for a change in fortunes of a side, you just need to be able to shake things up a bit.

As for Henry, he was overlooked for what I consider to be inferior players and not really given the run he deserved. Such is life, and managers have to take tough decisions but that doesn't mean I agree with them all the time.

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: James Henry

by Svlad Cjelli » 08 Dec 2010 11:42

Reading has got a long history of not risking youngsters as much as we should.

Nicky Shorey sat in the reserves for about year longer than he should have done (according to Pards)

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: James Henry

by Hoop Blah » 08 Dec 2010 11:47

I think we're kind of a victim of our own success in that regard. For a long time all our managers were under pressure for results because we were challenging in one way or another (how many years was it that our last game counted for something?). In that situation, and when for the most part Madejski provided reasonable funds to buy established players, I can understand a manager opting for experience instead of risking youth.

Rodgers at least threw a few in, even if it did ultimately end in him losing his job!

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: James Henry

by Svlad Cjelli » 08 Dec 2010 11:52

Hoop Blah I think we're kind of a victim of our own success in that regard. For a long time all our managers were under pressure for results because we were challenging in one way or another (how many years was it that our last game counted for something?). In that situation, and when for the most part Madejski provided reasonable funds to buy established players, I can understand a manager opting for experience instead of risking youth.

Rodgers at least threw a few in, even if it did ultimately end in him losing his job!


Which is why he was bleating about expecting along-term job but being sacked over short-term results.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: James Henry

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 08 Dec 2010 19:31

Plymouth_Royal
Ian Royal
pea One of about three players on the pitch on Saturday who looked championship quality but still faded at times. Great goal but its his first this season and he's got a decent amount of assists until you realise half of them came in one match.

Antonio, Kebe and McAnuff are all better and I'd have played sig on the wing ahead of Henry at the time we sold him too. Still, hope he does well and we receive a Cox-sized sell on fee in a few years.


really :shock:


Not totally convinced by antonio yet. He's quick, a bit unorthodox and strong, but he has the touch of a rapist and when opposing teams figure out his game i'm not sure he has the skill or brain to combat that.


I've never understood the popularity of that metaphor. It doesn't make a blind bit of sense, as well as being a dull-witted cliche (which should be avoided like the plague, obviously).

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: parky and 52 guests

It is currently 27 Aug 2025 14:02