BR2 Not that it might not be relevant but I see in today's paper there is a picture of the Sky girl in a bikini and the accompanying story was that she has previously posed for (and presumably got paid)a lads mag.
This implies to me that she is not averse to earning money by titillating the male species on the basis that it's usually men who buy the lads mags.
I wonder if Andy Gray's lawyers are now approaching whoever took those photos to establish whether the girl ever said anything sexually provocative to the photographer or whether he said anything to her that she accepted at the time to be sexist.
This is not a 60 year-old spinster sunday school teacher who just might have been offended by Gray's suggestion.
Some people might use the example that prostutes can still be raped as a counter argument but I reckon Gray would have had previous banter with this girl and that he has now been stitched up by what I called in earlier posts a creep.
Do we really want an abundance of creeps in our society who delight in snitching?
I don't but maybe some of you on here do and if so I hope that you get snitched upon.
modelling in a lads mag clearly means that people can sexually harass you in future?
