by Stranded » 01 Feb 2011 10:51
by Thomas L'Heureux » 01 Feb 2011 10:56
Stranded Does anyone seriously think Liverpool would have spent £35m on Carroll if they hadn't just pocketed £50m? The price tag is pretty irrelevant in this case.
by Svlad Cjelli » 01 Feb 2011 11:00
by Scylla » 01 Feb 2011 11:43
Thomas L'HeureuxStranded Does anyone seriously think Liverpool would have spent £35m on Carroll if they hadn't just pocketed £50m? The price tag is pretty irrelevant in this case.
I disagree. Liverpool's season should be written off in my opinion. They should've brought in Suarez for the £23million they paid which is a fairer sum than that paid for Carroll, and kept the £50million in the bank ready for the summer.
With £50million in what would be more of a buyer's market they could've replaced Torres for cheaper leaving them enough funds to bring in another player of decent ability.
Newcastle knew how desperate they were and got the most they could for Carroll, but I'm pretty sure he would not have gone for more than £20million during July or August.
by cmonurz » 01 Feb 2011 12:32
paultheroyal Someone needs to tell him though that transfer day is not like EBay!! Put in a last minute bis and hope!!
by Royal With Cheese » 01 Feb 2011 12:40
cmonurzpaultheroyal Someone needs to tell him though that transfer day is not like EBay!! Put in a last minute bis and hope!!
^This. BBC said this morning that it was only admin at Blackpool's end that stopped the deal going through. Had Redknapp not tried to be cute, he might have got the player.
by Alan Partridge » 01 Feb 2011 12:47
by cmonurz » 01 Feb 2011 12:47
by roadrunner » 01 Feb 2011 12:54
by prostak » 01 Feb 2011 13:00
by Scylla » 01 Feb 2011 13:03
prostak People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
by Royal With Cheese » 01 Feb 2011 13:03
Ideal Adam should shut the fcuk up. He was happy enough to sign the contract, then he should be prepared to see it through.
Blackpool clearly in the right, they can demand whatever they want for their player who is under contract for another 18 months.
In my opinion they should just keep him until the contract expires. He is clearly more valuable to them than what they would recoup through a sale.
If relegation would cost them £30M-40M, then that's what he's worth to them.
by Silver Fox » 01 Feb 2011 13:05
prostak People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
by prostak » 01 Feb 2011 13:09
Silver Foxprostak People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
So that's not Sturridge then I assume?
by Maguire » 01 Feb 2011 13:12
by Silver Fox » 01 Feb 2011 13:14
prostakSilver Foxprostak People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
So that's not Sturridge then I assume?
No, it's obviously Bill Cosby
by Scylla » 01 Feb 2011 13:18
IdealRoyal With Cheese But only if he could perform like Steve Sidwell did for us after he refused a new contract. I personally doubt that.
Even if he never plays for them again, they should make him stay until the end of his contract just to prove a point.
by Scylla » 01 Feb 2011 13:20
by TBM » 01 Feb 2011 13:24
Silver Foxprostak People from Manchester environs have trouble telling black people apart shocker...
So that's not Sturridge then I assume?
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests