Wall street journal analisys: Substitutes - timing

2 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: Wall street journal analisys: Substitutes - timing

by cmonurz » 11 Feb 2011 22:17

He also found that the timing of subs has no effect on the team ahead in the score or if the match is tied.

Dr. Myers said the rule shows that coaches underestimate the significance of fatigue late in a match, which causes them to overvalue starters and undervalue substitutes.


But only if a team is losing...?

It's interesting enough, but flawed conclusions. And imho you need a bigger sample than one season.

User avatar
6ft Kerplunk
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 15000
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:09
Location: Shoegazing Sheißhaus

Re: Wall street journal analisys: Substitutes - timing

by 6ft Kerplunk » 12 Feb 2011 19:21

cmonurz He also found that the timing of subs has no effect on the team ahead in the score or if the match is tied.

Dr. Myers said the rule shows that coaches underestimate the significance of fatigue late in a match, which causes them to overvalue starters and undervalue substitutes.


But only if a team is losing...?

It's interesting enough, but flawed conclusions. And imho you need a bigger sample than one season.


Can understand it not affecting a team thats winning. They'll be more likely to bring on an extra defensive player to protect their lead rather than a losing team chucking on more strikers.

2 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: parky and 55 guests

It is currently 27 Aug 2025 14:05