by St Pauli » 21 Feb 2011 23:37
by roadrunner » 22 Feb 2011 11:48
by Tails » 22 Feb 2011 12:10
by SpaceCruiser » 22 Feb 2011 13:16
roadrunner I can't see how this could also be us in a few years. LI are tennants at the Madejski Stadium, but there's a lot more to it at between Wycombe and Wasps.
by floyd__streete » 22 Feb 2011 13:52
roadrunner I can't see how this could also be us in a few years. LI are tennants at the Madejski Stadium, but there's a lot more to it at between Wycombe and Wasps.
by Wax Jacket » 22 Feb 2011 16:51
by bobbybottler » 22 Feb 2011 17:07
Tails It clearly says the stadium would be council owned, the rent would go to the council and not Wasps.
It is quite obvious why there is a proposed move separate from any Football/Rugby issue. The Chairman has identified that although a stadium is an 'asset', its not something you can use to borrow money and presents a real cost of maintenance and potential huge cost should something need doing. He therefore has suggested a move to a council owned stadium and to pay rent, removing the aforementioned costs and risks.
I can sympathise with the football fans' worry over losing history etc but don't think this is anything like a Wasps attempt at a coup of any sorts.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 22 Feb 2011 23:54
bobbybottlerTails It clearly says the stadium would be council owned, the rent would go to the council and not Wasps.
It is quite obvious why there is a proposed move separate from any Football/Rugby issue. The Chairman has identified that although a stadium is an 'asset', its not something you can use to borrow money and presents a real cost of maintenance and potential huge cost should something need doing. He therefore has suggested a move to a council owned stadium and to pay rent, removing the aforementioned costs and risks.
I can sympathise with the football fans' worry over losing history etc but don't think this is anything like a Wasps attempt at a coup of any sorts.
Wycombe sold their history when they cashed in on LOLoakes Park
by bobbybottler » 23 Feb 2011 00:42
Rev Algenon Stickleback HbobbybottlerTails It clearly says the stadium would be council owned, the rent would go to the council and not Wasps.
It is quite obvious why there is a proposed move separate from any Football/Rugby issue. The Chairman has identified that although a stadium is an 'asset', its not something you can use to borrow money and presents a real cost of maintenance and potential huge cost should something need doing. He therefore has suggested a move to a council owned stadium and to pay rent, removing the aforementioned costs and risks.
I can sympathise with the football fans' worry over losing history etc but don't think this is anything like a Wasps attempt at a coup of any sorts.
Wycombe sold their history when they cashed in on LOLoakes Park
It got them in the league though. Crowds more or less doubled after they moved. If they'd stayed they'd quite probably have been a Woking type club.
I did like Loakes Park though.
by Wax Jacket » 23 Feb 2011 09:26
by Svlad Cjelli » 23 Feb 2011 10:38
by Stranded » 23 Feb 2011 17:49
Svlad Cjelli A few years ago their "Founders' Trust" - a body going back years who had some special "Enshrined Rights" in the way the club was run and a veto on moving, winding up, etc - voted way those rights in return for promises of investment and expansion.
Guess what? - The investment and expansion never appeared.
by Svlad Cjelli » 25 Feb 2011 11:34
StrandedSvlad Cjelli A few years ago their "Founders' Trust" - a body going back years who had some special "Enshrined Rights" in the way the club was run and a veto on moving, winding up, etc - voted way those rights in return for promises of investment and expansion.
Guess what? - The investment and expansion never appeared.
Did they get that in writing and was it legally binding? If not then they were clearly naive and a bit foolish.
by Terminal Boardom » 25 Feb 2011 11:51
bobbybottlerTails It clearly says the stadium would be council owned, the rent would go to the council and not Wasps.
It is quite obvious why there is a proposed move separate from any Football/Rugby issue. The Chairman has identified that although a stadium is an 'asset', its not something you can use to borrow money and presents a real cost of maintenance and potential huge cost should something need doing. He therefore has suggested a move to a council owned stadium and to pay rent, removing the aforementioned costs and risks.
I can sympathise with the football fans' worry over losing history etc but don't think this is anything like a Wasps attempt at a coup of any sorts.
Wycombe sold their history when they cashed in on LOLoakes Park
Users browsing this forum: Google Adsense [Bot] and 61 guests