Weekend football 26th & 27th

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Man Friday » 28 Feb 2011 12:24

Alan Partridge
SLAMMED If I say I'm going running for a minimum of 5 minutes, that doesn't mean I'm limited to 5 minutes at 59 seconds.

What is the difficulty in understanding that?

If they say a minimum of 4 minutes additional time, the game can go on further than the 4 minutes.


Of course it can, but the referee is anticipating ending the game around that number that's why the board for 4minutes goes up. If it was more he would say 5 or 6. Of course things can happen in stoppage time which will adjust that number after it's been announced.

If he says 4minutes and nothing else happens to stop the game he SHOULD blow up between 4mins and 4 mins 59seconds. He did that today. So I don't see what the issue is/was.

If he says 4minutes and nothing else happens to stop the game he SHOULD blow up at 4mins. (The "minimum" applies to stoppages DURING the 4 minutes which have to be accounted for.)
Last edited by Man Friday on 28 Feb 2011 12:28, edited 4 times in total.

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Man Friday » 28 Feb 2011 12:26

To me this proves, beyond all doubt, that many football fans don't understand the rules ofthe game. (No surprise there.)

Man Friday
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2856
Joined: 20 Nov 2005 13:45

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Man Friday » 28 Feb 2011 12:40

Under your definition of a minmum of X (say 4) added minutes, why not apply it as 4 to 5:59 or 4 to 6:59? Or 20 mins. Why stop at 4:59? There's no logic. It's so clearly 4 plus any time needed for ADDITIONAL stoppages (within that 4 mins) that it's untrue.

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by southbank1871 » 28 Feb 2011 12:43

That's 7 posts in a row mf, WTF is going on? Are you arguing with yourself or can I not see other people's replies?

And saying Ianroyal doesn't know anything about football is hardly ground breaking.

User avatar
Kitson12
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2172
Joined: 30 Mar 2005 18:47
Location: Challenge42 World Record Holder!!

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Kitson12 » 28 Feb 2011 12:50

southbank1871 That's 7 posts in a row mf, WTF is going on? Are you arguing with yourself or can I not see other people's replies?

And saying Ianroyal doesn't know anything about football is hardly ground breaking.

He's having a Snowball moment.


User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Royal Lady » 28 Feb 2011 12:51

Is this a good place to say that even I know that the "minimum" time e.g. 4 mins for stoppages means that if during the 4 mins there were any other stoppages - notably for an injury, say, that that time would be added to the 4 mins? :|

User avatar
Skyline
Member
Posts: 841
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:50
Location: The squirrel's not important

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Skyline » 28 Feb 2011 12:57

Kitson12
southbank1871 That's 7 posts in a row mf, WTF is going on? Are you arguing with yourself or can I not see other people's replies?

And saying Ianroyal doesn't know anything about football is hardly ground breaking.

He's having a Snowball moment.


Overposting and being wrong at the same time? Yep, sounds like Snowball to me.

Tony Le Mesmer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3404
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 20:37
Location: Dundee in my bare feet

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Tony Le Mesmer » 28 Feb 2011 15:02

Yet more evidence the Premier League is bent to the core. ROFLooney escapes a ban because the referee "took the appropriate action" :roll:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 409644.stm

User avatar
soggy biscuit
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8524
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 20:29
Location: BURNING VARIOUS NATIONAL FLAGS

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by soggy biscuit » 28 Feb 2011 15:05

Wayne Rooney in special treatment shocker


PlasticRoyale
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1409
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 00:01
Location: Y25

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by PlasticRoyale » 28 Feb 2011 15:07

tbf Man utd have got some tough games coming up and need their best players available

papereyes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6027
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:41
Location: “The mother of idiots is always pregnant”- Italian proverb

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by papereyes » 28 Feb 2011 15:08

handbags_harris Either way, minimum of 4 minutes + no stoppages = 4 minutes played. End of. Not 4 minutes 40 seconds.


At least one Birmingham player got booked for timewasting. I just assumed he added a bit more for that.

Tony Le Mesmer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3404
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 20:37
Location: Dundee in my bare feet

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Tony Le Mesmer » 28 Feb 2011 15:14

Man Friday It's 4 mins + any additional stopages, not 4 to 4:59 + any additional stopages.



Er, what? The board is just an indication of the number of whole mins. Its 4mins-4 59sec + additional stoppages, only the ref know exactly how much to the second. Really grates me when commentators say "times up" after exactly the number of mins shown, when they are clearly talking out of their arse.

PlasticRoyale
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1409
Joined: 28 Jan 2006 00:01
Location: Y25

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by PlasticRoyale » 28 Feb 2011 15:16

is this written down anywhere on a website endorsed by the FA

just to clear it up


User avatar
prostak
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1047
Joined: 14 Aug 2008 10:28

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by prostak » 01 Mar 2011 01:26

"The fourth official indicates the minimum additional time decided by the
referee at the end of the final minute of each period of play.
The announcement of the additional time does not indicate the exact amount
of time left in the match. The time may be increased if the referee considers it
appropriate but never reduced."

http://www.thefa.com/TheFA/RulesandRegu ... 201011.pdf

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Svlad Cjelli » 02 Mar 2011 14:10

Tony Le Mesmer Yet more evidence the Premier League is bent to the core. ROFLooney escapes a ban because the referee "took the appropriate action" :roll:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 409644.stm


That's down to the FA's rules, no the PL.

User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by cmonurz » 02 Mar 2011 14:19

I'd say that all rules are open to interpretation, and that the referee deemed a player to have been impeded, and so a free-kick given, doesn't have to mean that the referee saw and dealt with the incident that subsequently became evident.

No Fixed Abode

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by No Fixed Abode » 02 Mar 2011 14:37

Tony Le Mesmer Yet more evidence the Premier League is bent to the core. ROFLooney escapes a ban because the referee "took the appropriate action" :roll:

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/footbal ... 409644.stm


Thing is the FA are investigating Barry Ferguson for hitting Cockshellney in the Carling Cup final when they scored the winner. But Noel Hunt got away with the same sort of thing against Watford when he scored. Pretty much strangled their player.

User avatar
Svlad Cjelli
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 4605
Joined: 14 May 2008 09:25
Location: It's the Premier LEAGUE, you cretins. The Premiership hasn't existed for years.

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Svlad Cjelli » 02 Mar 2011 16:23


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Ian Royal » 02 Mar 2011 18:19

Man Friday
Ian Royal
SLAMMED But more time can be added on by the ref within added time.

If he indicates a minimum of 5 minutes additional time, and a player goes down for 10 minutes in the 2nd minute of added time, he can end the game after 15 minutes of stoppage time.


No where do I say any different. That's why I said 4.00 - 4.59 + any additional stopages

Has someone let loose a retard virus whilst I wasn't looking and dropped the average HNA IQ from 80 to 13?

FFS, minmum doesn't mean the ref can allow play to continue for another 59 seconds without reason. It's 4 mins + any additional stopages, not 4 to 4:59 + any additional stopages.

FFS, think about it, if the refs had this discretion they'd be uproar if he allowed play to continue for another 59 secs without reason and the other team scored. There's enough problems as it is agreeing the amount of additional time that may be needed beyond the original added time without refs adding time on on a whim.


So you're telling me that refs can only add stopages in normal time that total exactly 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 or whatever minutes? That would be ridiculously oxf*rd stupid. How often does a ref stop the game on exactly 91, 92, 93, 94, 95 etc minutes? :roll:

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22389
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Weekend football 26th & 27th

by Royal Rother » 02 Mar 2011 18:34

The referee clearly runs his own XT watch; seeing as they so often do go beyond the (say) 4 minutes shown on the board but also, on occasions, do blow for full time exactly on 4 mins, I rather assumed that, if the ref's own watch shows less than 4 minutes he will blow exactly on 4 mins, but if it shows more than 4 mins then he'll play more. But that he'll also add time on for any stoppages / time wasting etc. during that 4 mins.

Seems like the logical thing to me anyway.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 45 guests

It is currently 27 Aug 2025 13:48