by Simon's Church » 23 Oct 2011 15:12
by rhroyal » 23 Oct 2011 15:31
FiNeRaInrhroyalcmonurz John Ruddy was quite outstanding.
CarollOL is all I have to say on that game. Absolute sitter not even on target; nice use of £35m.
Yeah because one miss equates to that whole 35 million.![]()
Naive.
by sandman » 23 Oct 2011 15:55
by Simon's Church » 23 Oct 2011 16:12
by SLAMMED » 23 Oct 2011 16:17
by FiNeRaIn » 23 Oct 2011 16:19
rhroyal Less goals than Gylfi in the Championship followed by half a good season in the Premiership doesn't either.
by Svlad Cjelli » 23 Oct 2011 16:22
by SLAMMED » 23 Oct 2011 16:23
by Simon's Church » 23 Oct 2011 16:24
by sandman » 23 Oct 2011 16:28
FiNeRaInrhroyal Less goals than Gylfi in the Championship followed by half a good season in the Premiership doesn't either.
If thats all you're judging Andy Carroll on then you are very naive.
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2011 16:31
by Royal Lady » 23 Oct 2011 16:34
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2011 16:36
Royal Lady QPR were 30 something to 1 to win today - so guess who had a little punt?! (clue: it wasn't me)
TMD won't be gloating for a while I suspect and, hopefully, Kes will disappear...
by Compo's Hat » 23 Oct 2011 16:40
Alan Partridge Refs had a shocker for the first 2 decisions. But hey ho CheLOLsea. Drogba's a massive belmont
I still half fancy Chelsea to win even with 9 because QPR are bobbins.
by Simon's Church » 23 Oct 2011 16:41
by paultheroyal » 23 Oct 2011 16:43
Alan Partridge Refs had a shocker for the first 2 decisions. But hey ho CheLOLsea. Drogba's a massive belmont
I still half fancy Chelsea to win even with 9 because QPR are bobbins.
by Alan Partridge » 23 Oct 2011 16:43
paultheroyalAlan Partridge Refs had a shocker for the first 2 decisions. But hey ho CheLOLsea. Drogba's a massive belmont
I still half fancy Chelsea to win even with 9 because QPR are bobbins.
Not a penalty?
by rhroyal » 23 Oct 2011 16:45
FiNeRaInrhroyal Less goals than Gylfi in the Championship followed by half a good season in the Premiership doesn't either.
If thats all you're judging Andy Carroll on then you are very naive.
by Svlad Cjelli » 23 Oct 2011 16:48
rhroyalFiNeRaInrhroyal Less goals than Gylfi in the Championship followed by half a good season in the Premiership doesn't either.
If thats all you're judging Andy Carroll on then you are very naive.
I'm not "judging" him. I just think that £35m was too much for him with his track record. So far at Liverpool, he doesn't look like he's going to justify the fee either. He may prove me wrong, I just don't expect him to.
by sandman » 23 Oct 2011 16:51
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 82 guests