by sandman » 18 May 2012 10:20
by Extended-Phenotype » 18 May 2012 10:30
Extended-Phenotype Chelsea.
A ‘big’ team who didn’t earn their money is rather charmless, but it’s also the boring long ball style of play; you’d expect more football from a side so rich.
Plus, they have a rich history of signing dislikeable arseholes. Can’t remember the last player they had that I admired.
by cmonurz » 18 May 2012 11:06
by Ian Royal » 18 May 2012 11:09
TBMCobiNo Fixed Abode 'were'.
league placing suggests 'are'
Champions League final, FA Cup winners - suggests 'were'
by pea » 18 May 2012 11:50
No Fixed AbodeExtended-Phenotype Chelsea.
A ‘big’ team who didn’t earn their money is rather charmless, but it’s also the boring long ball style of play; you’d expect more football from a side so rich.
Plus, they have a rich history of signing dislikeable arseholes. Can’t remember the last player they had that I admired.
Zola?
by pea » 18 May 2012 11:51
Ian Royal Man City ought to be disliked like Chelsea because of the moneybags issue.
by TBM » 18 May 2012 11:52
peaNo Fixed AbodeExtended-Phenotype Chelsea.
A ‘big’ team who didn’t earn their money is rather charmless, but it’s also the boring long ball style of play; you’d expect more football from a side so rich.
Plus, they have a rich history of signing dislikeable arseholes. Can’t remember the last player they had that I admired.
Zola?
Sidwell?
by LUX » 18 May 2012 12:51
peaIan Royal Man City ought to be disliked like Chelsea because of the moneybags issue.
I think everyones just accepted that its nice for the people of Manchester to have some footballing success to celebrate for a change.
by who are ya? » 18 May 2012 13:00
TBMpeaNo Fixed Abode Zola?
Sidwell?
Bertrand
by LUX » 18 May 2012 13:05
by leww_rfc » 18 May 2012 13:12
by SpaceCruiser » 18 May 2012 19:46
by leon » 18 May 2012 20:13
LUX Bonetti
leonLUX Bonetti
Nevin
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Orion1871 and 67 guests