Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

Should Team GB continue?

Yes
24
45%
No
29
55%
 
Total votes: 53
User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by cmonurz » 02 Aug 2012 13:19

As I said above, ignoring the politics of it, we'd need to enter a GB team into the European Under-21 Championship, in order to qualify. Which won't happen.

User avatar
floyd__streete
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8326
Joined: 19 Jan 2005 18:03
Location: ARREST RAY ILSLEY.

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by floyd__streete » 02 Aug 2012 13:48

The best solution would be for us just to enter a team anyway, block any attempts to merge the 4 independent FAs using our veto as explained earlier in thread and then design a special commemorative shirt for the event bearing the words:

WE DO WHAT WE WAAAAAANT......

8)

just some bloke
Member
Posts: 363
Joined: 30 Dec 2011 18:36
Location: Cambridge

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by just some bloke » 02 Aug 2012 14:00

cmonurz As I said above, ignoring the politics of it, we'd need to enter a GB team into the European Under-21 Championship, in order to qualify. Which won't happen.


One possible workaround would be for a British qualifying team from that (England, most likely), would then go on to represent Britain at the Olympics. But I guess then it would be unlikely we could include Welsh or Scottish players having qualified as an English team.

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Royal With Cheese » 02 Aug 2012 14:18

I've had a think about it.

Yes, yes they should.

It would really piss off the Taffs and Jocks so it gets my vote.

User avatar
soggy biscuit
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8524
Joined: 04 Nov 2004 20:29
Location: BURNING VARIOUS NATIONAL FLAGS

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by soggy biscuit » 02 Aug 2012 16:42

ZacNaloen Scotland is holding a referendum next year on devolution and I wouldn't be surprised if one followed for Wales soon after.


I would


pea
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2261
Joined: 07 Mar 2009 16:16
Location: brighton

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by pea » 02 Aug 2012 16:44

soggy biscuit
ZacNaloen Scotland is holding a referendum next year on devolution and I wouldn't be surprised if one followed for Wales soon after.


I would


lol @ Zac

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by ZacNaloen » 02 Aug 2012 17:45

Can't say I get the Joke


Talk of independance in Wales is always bubbling away in the background, much like in Scotland. There may not be much of an appetite now they've just had a major victory in gaining extra powers and support for full independance has hovered between 10 and 15%, but if Scotland successfully leave the union I wouldn't be at all surprised to see plaid start to make louder noises about it.. And of course what I mean by soon is open to personal interpretation.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 02 Aug 2012 21:06

cmonurz As I said above, ignoring the politics of it, we'd need to enter a GB team into the European Under-21 Championship, in order to qualify. Which won't happen.

Not really. Just say that if one of the British teams qualifies then GB can take part.

User avatar
Stuka
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3480
Joined: 15 Nov 2006 17:09
Location: North London

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Stuka » 03 Aug 2012 16:06

Can it be called Team UK, or better yet just 'UK'? We don't go round calling ourselves 'Team England' and neither is there 'Team Sweden' or 'Team Moldova'. Also it should be UK as presumably Northern Ireland would be represented, if only on paper.


Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 03 Aug 2012 18:41

Stuka Can it be called Team UK, or better yet just 'UK'? We don't go round calling ourselves 'Team England' and neither is there 'Team Sweden' or 'Team Moldova'. Also it should be UK as presumably Northern Ireland would be represented, if only on paper.

I think that's down to the curious issue of the IOC insisting that there's a country out there called Ireland, and Northern Ireland is part of "Ireland".

I think the "team" part is pretty common across many countries, but I don't like it. It's fine if you are referring to the whole Olympic squad, but not inividual teams.

AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25572
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by AthleticoSpizz » 04 Aug 2012 00:02

oh yes (in answer to the original question)

gazzer, loyal royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1936
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 21:45
Location: Khalifa Cisse sleeps with the light on, not because he is afraid of the dark, but because the dark i

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by gazzer, loyal royal » 04 Aug 2012 09:11

cmonurz As I said above, ignoring the politics of it, we'd need to enter a GB team into the European Under-21 Championship, in order to qualify. Which won't happen.


exactly this. The IOC won't let another country qualify as GB, so we will have to play as GB in the U21s to qualify

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Royal With Cheese » 04 Aug 2012 09:14

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Stuka Can it be called Team UK, or better yet just 'UK'? We don't go round calling ourselves 'Team England' and neither is there 'Team Sweden' or 'Team Moldova'. Also it should be UK as presumably Northern Ireland would be represented, if only on paper.

I think that's down to the curious issue of the IOC insisting that there's a country out there called Ireland, and Northern Ireland is part of "Ireland".

I think the "team" part is pretty common across many countries, but I don't like it. It's fine if you are referring to the whole Olympic squad, but not inividual teams.

But there isn't a county called Ireland. It's called the Republic of Ireland and the Good Friday Agreement established Northern Ireland's right to self determination.

It's our governing body have decided to call us Team GB I believe because it sounds nice.

Also, you'll find a lot of NI compeditors competing for ROI for both policitcal and funding reasons.

TBF - it's a bit of a mess.


SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6517
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by SCIAG » 04 Aug 2012 23:00

ZacNaloen Can't say I get the Joke


Talk of independance in Wales is always bubbling away in the background, much like in Scotland. There may not be much of an appetite now they've just had a major victory in gaining extra powers and support for full independance has hovered between 10 and 15%, but if Scotland successfully leave the union I wouldn't be at all surprised to see plaid start to make louder noises about it.. And of course what I mean by soon is open to personal interpretation.

Scotland is much more affluent than Wales though. I imagine Wales would struggle without the money from London and the SE.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Aug 2012 10:18

Royal With Cheese
Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Stuka Can it be called Team UK, or better yet just 'UK'? We don't go round calling ourselves 'Team England' and neither is there 'Team Sweden' or 'Team Moldova'. Also it should be UK as presumably Northern Ireland would be represented, if only on paper.

I think that's down to the curious issue of the IOC insisting that there's a country out there called Ireland, and Northern Ireland is part of "Ireland".

I think the "team" part is pretty common across many countries, but I don't like it. It's fine if you are referring to the whole Olympic squad, but not inividual teams.

But there isn't a county called Ireland. It's called the Republic of Ireland and the Good Friday Agreement established Northern Ireland's right to self determination.

There's no Republic of Ireland team in the Olympics. It's just Ireland, and that team officially covers Northern Ireland as well.

Quite why the IOC overrules sovereign states or even the UN on the definintion of countries is a mystery.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Ian Royal » 05 Aug 2012 10:42

Isn't it because the IOC avoids politics, so if enough people believe in a country that doesn't strictly exist and want to compete under that flag, they're welcome to?

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Royal With Cheese » 05 Aug 2012 10:46

It was a moot point up until the good Friday agreement but frankly nothing surprises me around governing bodies of sport.

It does make you wonder then why the cross of St Patrick isn't used or, as in Rugby, the green flag to denominate Irish compeditors. The tricolour is clearly a national flag of ROI.

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Royal With Cheese » 05 Aug 2012 10:47

Ian Royal Isn't it because the IOC avoids politics, so if enough people believe in a country that doesn't strictly exist and want to compete under that flag, they're welcome to?


User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Hoop Blah » 05 Aug 2012 14:34

Rev Algenon Stickleback H I think that's down to the curious issue of the IOC insisting that there's a country out there called Ireland, and Northern Ireland is part of "Ireland".

There's no Republic of Ireland team in the Olympics. It's just Ireland, and that team officially covers Northern Ireland as well.

Quite why the IOC overrules sovereign states or even the UN on the definintion of countries is a mystery.


But Northern Ireland competitors compete for Great Britain don't they? Or do they basically have a choice?

I thought 'Ireland' was just ROI but lazily dropping the R and O.

Rev Algenon Stickleback H
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3187
Joined: 22 Apr 2004 20:15

Re: Should Team GB continue after London 2012?

by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Aug 2012 16:46

Hoop Blah
Rev Algenon Stickleback H I think that's down to the curious issue of the IOC insisting that there's a country out there called Ireland, and Northern Ireland is part of "Ireland".

There's no Republic of Ireland team in the Olympics. It's just Ireland, and that team officially covers Northern Ireland as well.

Quite why the IOC overrules sovereign states or even the UN on the definintion of countries is a mystery.


But Northern Ireland competitors compete for Great Britain don't they? Or do they basically have a choice?

I thought 'Ireland' was just ROI but lazily dropping the R and O.


Those from Northern Ireland can be in either team. The official name of the team is Ireland, all dating messily back to 1922 when Ireland joined the IOC.

The Great Britain team also includes overseas territories which aren't part of Great Britain, although how many athletes we ever take from the Falklands or Pitcairn Islands etc is a different question.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Hove Royal and 42 guests

It is currently 24 Aug 2025 23:59