Reading Hoolies

[Alexander Litvinenko]

I know people enjoy picking over the Home Office arrest and Banning order figures, so as a public service the latest set are here : http://www.fsf.org.uk/media/uploaded/file/Home-Office-Statistics-2011-2012.pdf

Reading relevance :

FOOTBALL BANNING ORDERS BY CLUB SUPPORTED
Total number of banning orders against risk supporters of each club

stats1.JPG (56.25 KiB) Viewed 1581 times

[LWJ]

Just making sure i'm IN on this thread.

[Alexander Litvinenko]

You have a cell (this one in the table) all to your self on the next table :

FOOTBALL BANNING ORDERS IMPOSED IN THIS REPORTING PERIOD, BY CLUB SUPPORTED TABLE 2
Table shows the number of banning orders imposed against risk supporters between 30th November 2011 (the date following cut-off for the table published in the 2010-11 season statistics) and 9th November 2012 (total 493)

stats3.JPG (58.77 KiB) Viewed 1575 times

[LWJ]

You will have a PM in a couple of minutes

[Royal With Cheese]

I wonder who it was?

[LoyalRoyalFan]

More Reading fans were arrested at games last season than West Ham fans?

[Alexander Litvinenko]

More Reading fans were arrested at games last season than West Ham fans?

Yes, but the numbers are so small (10 vs 4) that it only takes one small incident to skew the statistics.

We're talking about 10 out of a total attendance of 442,045 for Reading and 4 out of a total attendance of 745,919 for West Ham (ignoring away fan arrests) so the percentages are so small that statistically there's virtually no different : 0.00226% vs. 0.00053%

[Barry the bird boggler]

Bet our 1 banning order was for persistently not sitting down.

[moo]

Bet our 1 banning order was for persistently not sitting down.

I thought it was for going into the toilets with some stewards ? Gay

[Green]

More Reading fans were arrested at games last season than West Ham fans?

Yes, but the numbers are so small (10 vs 4) that it only takes one small incident to skew the statistics.

We're talking about 10 out of a total attendance of 442,045 for Reading and 4 out of a total attendance of 745,919 for West Ham (ignoring away fan arrests) so the percentages are so small that statistically there's virtually no different : 0.00226% vs. 0.00053%

And this is before you get into the debate around whether a high number of bans indicates a club with a problem, or a club tackling (and eradicating) a problem.

[M Brook]

Bet our 1 banning order was for persistently not sitting down.

Apparently it was someone in the Upper West not using the right cutlery!

[peterroyal76]

Bet our 1 banning order was for persistently not sitting down.

Apparently it was someone in the Upper West not using the right cutlery!

To be fair I told them it wasn't a soup spoon, but oh no they wouldn't listen.