CayeneMatt Looked to me like he'd beefed up too

This was him at 17

Chelsea have had him on a training regime to lose muscle ever since he joined because he was their heaviest player.
by Simon's Church » 12 Jan 2013 23:06
CayeneMatt Looked to me like he'd beefed up too
by southbank1871 » 12 Jan 2013 23:30
by UpThePrem » 12 Jan 2013 23:56
Brianstorm The guy's a beast. The Baggies will find it nigh on impossible to replace him.
by TBM » 13 Jan 2013 00:00
UpThePremBrianstorm The guy's a beast. The Baggies will find it nigh on impossible to replace him.
They may not need to as he's already made it clear he wants to stay there next season as well.
by winchester_royal » 13 Jan 2013 00:47
No Fixed Abode Thing is, Reading could have this type of player on loan but they won't. The reason being there is no chance of signing him on a perm basis. Fair enough BUT sometimes a loan signing could be the difference of going down and staying up.
by Franchise FC » 13 Jan 2013 07:54
winchester_royalNo Fixed Abode Thing is, Reading could have this type of player on loan but they won't. The reason being there is no chance of signing him on a perm basis. Fair enough BUT sometimes a loan signing could be the difference of going down and staying up.
And then leaves a massive hole in the team the following year. Can understand McD's point of view on this one.
by Eaststandman » 13 Jan 2013 11:25
MouldyRoyal Bigger than the fridge.
by Christof » 13 Jan 2013 11:32
toppy Torres will be on loan at slough next year.
by handbags_harris » 13 Jan 2013 13:05
by genome » 13 Jan 2013 13:26
marcusopp You all forgot one thing;
Torres and Rafa are clearly blowing each other!
I know rafa wasn't there when Lukaku went on loan, but it's funny.
PS, chelsea can presumably recall him whenever they want, right? Why the feck don't they?
by SCIAG » 13 Jan 2013 14:48
marcusopp PS, chelsea can presumably recall him whenever they want, right? Why the feck don't they?
by winchester_royal » 13 Jan 2013 16:31
Franchise FCwinchester_royalNo Fixed Abode Thing is, Reading could have this type of player on loan but they won't. The reason being there is no chance of signing him on a perm basis. Fair enough BUT sometimes a loan signing could be the difference of going down and staying up.
And then leaves a massive hole in the team the following year. Can understand McD's point of view on this one.
I'd much prefer the problem of finding a replacement in the PL than not having the hole to fill in the Championship.
That would leave us with a very different black hole
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 63 guests