by NewCorkSeth » 05 Sep 2013 17:04
by TBM » 05 Sep 2013 17:12
by NewCorkSeth » 05 Sep 2013 17:18
by southbank1871 » 05 Sep 2013 17:22
by TBM » 05 Sep 2013 17:26
NewCorkSeth I understand that completely but why sign a 27 year old defender on a one year contract just to send out on loan? Dobbie (30) was given the number 11 and a two year contract. The whole thing stinks of poor planning.. They were panic signed early on and now that they have signed better players they have become surplus to requirements
by NewCorkSeth » 05 Sep 2013 17:34
TBMNewCorkSeth I understand that completely but why sign a 27 year old defender on a one year contract just to send out on loan? Dobbie (30) was given the number 11 and a two year contract. The whole thing stinks of poor planning.. They were panic signed early on and now that they have signed better players they have become surplus to requirements
Marange was a free transfer and if the club they loan him too pays 100% of his wages then Palace haven't lost out. He probably wasn't as good as they thought he would be in the Premiership - as for Dobbie, if he does well wherever he goes Palace can still get a fee for him next season
by TBM » 05 Sep 2013 17:41
NewCorkSethTBMNewCorkSeth I understand that completely but why sign a 27 year old defender on a one year contract just to send out on loan? Dobbie (30) was given the number 11 and a two year contract. The whole thing stinks of poor planning.. They were panic signed early on and now that they have signed better players they have become surplus to requirements
Marange was a free transfer and if the club they loan him too pays 100% of his wages then Palace haven't lost out. He probably wasn't as good as they thought he would be in the Premiership - as for Dobbie, if he does well wherever he goes Palace can still get a fee for him next season
Stop polishing this turd.. The best scenario for Marange as you describe it is the same as if they didnt sign him.. not being as good as they thought he was going to be is a terrible and unprofessional excuse 3 games in.. The fact he was given only a 1 year contract suggests to me they wanted him for back-up then signed better back up (Mariappa) they already had Parr and Moxey. The whole thing is just bad business!
by NewCorkSeth » 05 Sep 2013 17:46
TBM
Bad business for who?
He wasn't back up though, he's played 2 games so far this season
by YateleyRoyal » 06 Sep 2013 08:32
by Sanguine » 06 Sep 2013 09:47
by Pepe the Horseman » 06 Sep 2013 11:03
by TBM » 06 Sep 2013 11:12
Pepe the Horseman Owen Garvan, who was also left out by Holloway, tweeted 'I'll be here longer than he will... Trust me'
by southbank1871 » 06 Sep 2013 11:13
by YateleyRoyal » 06 Sep 2013 11:33
Pepe the Horseman Owen Garvan, who was also left out by Holloway, tweeted 'I'll be here longer than he will... Trust me'
by Barry the bird boggler » 06 Sep 2013 11:55
by NewCorkSeth » 06 Sep 2013 16:12
Pepe the Horseman Owen Garvan, who was also left out by Holloway, tweeted 'I'll be here longer than he will... Trust me'
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 36 guests