by sandman »
11 Oct 2013 07:34
Maguire southbank1871 Despite the inevitable boredom and disappointment, major tournaments aren't the same when we don't qualify.
Exactly.
Saying "oh it would be better with Montenegro" is arch-gimpness. Not it wouldn't England are an extremely well-supported side which other nations take an interest in.
If we don't qualify then 2014 will be significantly less enjoyable
Would it f{u}ck. England didn't qualify for Euro 2008 and it was the best tournament in recent memory, Guess why? It was because England weren't there and you could get on with watching the football without daily updates from the f[u]cking England camp, without The f[u]cking Sun, Daily Mail, etc going on about "our boys winning it", no WAGS, no Metatarsals and no Ron Atkinson or Terry Venables contributing their vocal "talents" to an already shit song.
What did we have instead? Great football from a brilliant Spain team, the emergence of a new Germany beginning to show the signs of their progress which has gained more momentum since, a surprise package in Russia, a plucky (pun intended) Turkey and the Dutch producing brilliant performances to beat Italy 3-0 and France 4-1. Even the rubbish games like Turkey vs Croatia had exciting dramatic moments with Croatia getting a goal in the last regular minute of extra time, thinking they'd won and Turkey equalising about a minute later.
The World Cup would survive without England being there.