FSF letting themselves again.

10 posts   •   Page 1 of 1
retro_royal
Member
Posts: 486
Joined: 24 Sep 2008 16:13
Location: Royal_Belly= Fake Face

FSF letting themselves again.

by retro_royal » 31 Oct 2013 14:55

Sitting in the side of the authorities as opposed to supporters. Cranks the lot of them.



Amanda Jacks, Case Worker for the FSF, said: "While some fans who bring pyro into grounds often do so with good intentions at heart, such as improving the atmosphere, there can be very serious consequences - injury, banning orders, criminal records and even prison."Furthermore, increasing numbers of fans are speaking out against their use. There are obvious safety implications, particularly if flares are thrown about like. Others simply resent having their views blocked by smoke and fans have been hospitalised with smoke inhalation."

User avatar
bobby1413
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6986
Joined: 07 Apr 2005 10:55
Location: Reading

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by bobby1413 » 31 Oct 2013 14:57

Why the feck do fans need or want flares anyway?

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by southbank1871 » 31 Oct 2013 15:23

Fans who use flares are try-hard pcunts tbf.

User avatar
Bandini
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3761
Joined: 03 Sep 2010 16:01
Location: No one must know I dropped my glasses in the toilet.

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by Bandini » 31 Oct 2013 18:04

retro_royal Sitting in the side of the authorities as opposed to supporters. Cranks the lot of them.



Amanda Jacks, Case Worker for the FSF, said: "While some fans who bring pyro into grounds often do so with good intentions at heart, such as improving the atmosphere, there can be very serious consequences - injury, banning orders, criminal records and even prison."Furthermore, increasing numbers of fans are speaking out against their use. There are obvious safety implications, particularly if flares are thrown about like. Others simply resent having their views blocked by smoke and fans have been hospitalised with smoke inhalation."


I thought it was established on HNA? that these try-hards don't have a clue about the likelihood of fans going to prison in these circumstances.

User avatar
southbank1871
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3279
Joined: 02 Mar 2005 12:15
Location: And yeah I'd love to tell you all my problem, you're not from New York City you're from Rotherham

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by southbank1871 » 31 Oct 2013 18:17

If this kind of Dirk-b8 doesn't bring him out of hiding, we may have lost him forever.


User avatar
leon
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 32414
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:18
Location: Hips, Lips, Tits, Power

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by leon » 01 Nov 2013 00:39

I'm disappointed with the content of this thread and it's title. It prompts the question what situation - has the FSF got themselves into (outside factors considered) that means they are letting themselves again?

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by Royal Lady » 01 Nov 2013 14:53

retro_royal Sitting in the side of the authorities as opposed to supporters. Cranks the lot of them.



Amanda Jacks, Case Worker for the FSF, said: "While some fans who bring pyro into grounds often do so with good intentions at heart, such as improving the atmosphere, there can be very serious consequences - injury, banning orders, criminal records and even prison."Furthermore, increasing numbers of fans are speaking out against their use. There are obvious safety implications, particularly if flares are thrown about like. Others simply resent having their views blocked by smoke and fans have been hospitalised with smoke inhalation."

Nothing wrong with any of that Aggers. I would suspect that the majority of fans do not want flares, in which case, the FSF are representing the majority. :|

Big Foot
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8336
Joined: 30 Jun 2008 15:19
Location: #MagicOfTheCup #RoadToWembley

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by Big Foot » 01 Nov 2013 15:03

Royal Lady
retro_royal Sitting in the side of the authorities as opposed to supporters. Cranks the lot of them.



Amanda Jacks, Case Worker for the FSF, said: "While some fans who bring pyro into grounds often do so with good intentions at heart, such as improving the atmosphere, there can be very serious consequences - injury, banning orders, criminal records and even prison."Furthermore, increasing numbers of fans are speaking out against their use. There are obvious safety implications, particularly if flares are thrown about like. Others simply resent having their views blocked by smoke and fans have been hospitalised with smoke inhalation."

Nothing wrong with any of that Aggers. I would suspect that the majority of fans do not want flares, in which case, the FSF are representing the majority. :|

Don't the majority also not want safe standing? FSF doing everything in their power to support that...?

User avatar
TBM
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 16917
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:27
Location: Prediction League Champion 2009/2010, 2010/2011 & 2013/2014

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by TBM » 01 Nov 2013 15:09



User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 29708
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: FSF letting themselves again.

by Green » 01 Nov 2013 17:32

Don't like the term "pyro"

Flares or fireworks surely.

10 posts   •   Page 1 of 1

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests

It is currently 22 Aug 2025 23:11