For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12556
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by bcubed » 09 Dec 2013 23:21

Barry the bird boggler
Royal Prince
LoyalRoyal22 First half was 433. Second half was a diamond.

That is all.


You sure?

I thought first half was 4-2-3-1, with Sharp the loan striker, and the three 'wingers' playing behind him, with Hal in the middle of the three but swapping with the other two on a regular basis as they moved inside.


That's what I saw it as and what it most looked like. It wasn't the personnel I would have chosen to play that way though, but then I'm starting to think either NA hasn't a clue what he's doing or half the squad are not good enough for what NA is trying to achieve here.


Definitely 451 or 4231
And I agree the wrong personnel for that formation
Macanuff should have played alongside Guthrie and Williams and drop Kanu

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by Ian Royal » 10 Dec 2013 20:06

You could see from opposition goal kicks that we lined up 4-3-3 first half. That's when shape is the most obvious. It's also the formation given from Reading Player pre-game. And you'd hope that someone would tell them, although you never know.

The confusion probably comes from Obita shifting out wide left to overload the full back in attack, HRK being absolutely toss all game and McCleary kinda wandering around where he wanted.

There was then some sort of horrific attempt at a 4-4-2 diamond at some point after Pog came on that just didn't work. Then when McCleary went off I'm not sure what was happening. We then went 3-4-3 once ALF came on for Gorkss.

Agree McAnuff should have started over HRK. Althoguh HRK usually provides more goal threat. Pog should have started over Sharp too. Think we'd have seen far better movement and passing with those two changes.

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by LoyalRoyal22 » 14 Dec 2013 17:47

At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.

loyalroyal4life
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5595
Joined: 15 May 2007 11:58

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by loyalroyal4life » 14 Dec 2013 18:12

LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.



Yeah, really hard to work out when commentator spells it out for you... well done on that one

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by LoyalRoyal22 » 14 Dec 2013 18:31

loyalroyal4life
LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.



Yeah, really hard to work out when commentator spells it out for you... well done on that one


Don't listen on radio you clueless little oxf*rd


sandman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12449
Joined: 01 Oct 2008 18:25
Location: Slaughterhouse soaked in blood and betrayal

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by sandman » 14 Dec 2013 19:14

Boo, LoyalRoyal22, boo.

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12556
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by bcubed » 14 Dec 2013 20:40

LoyalRoyal22
loyalroyal4life
LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.



Yeah, really hard to work out when commentator spells it out for you... well done on that one


Don't listen on radio you clueless little oxf*rd


I'm curious - how do you know he's little?

User avatar
Handsome Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3326
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 08:21
Location: Practically Rock Paper Scissors Champion of the World

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by Handsome Man » 15 Dec 2013 10:23

LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.


Or those who don't play championship manager?

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by LoyalRoyal22 » 15 Dec 2013 18:02

Handsome Man
LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.


Or those who don't play championship manager?


Fifa

But seriously anyone with basic knowledge of the game could work out what systems we play.


SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6517
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by SCIAG » 15 Dec 2013 18:04

LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.

For most of the match it was a flat 4-4-2 with McAnuff alongside Williams and Drenthe wide right.

User avatar
LoyalRoyal22
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2608
Joined: 18 Jan 2005 20:06
Location: Derbyshire

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by LoyalRoyal22 » 15 Dec 2013 18:05

SCIAG
LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.

For most of the match it was a flat 4-4-2 with McAnuff alongside Williams and Drenthe wide right.


Started as a diamond

User avatar
bcubed
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12556
Joined: 30 Oct 2004 18:16
Location: Would do better with a stick of rhubarb

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by bcubed » 15 Dec 2013 21:00

LoyalRoyal22
SCIAG
LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.

For most of the match it was a flat 4-4-2 with McAnuff alongside Williams and Drenthe wide right.


Started as a diamond

So not that obvious then!

The Cube
Member
Posts: 939
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 18:52

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by The Cube » 15 Dec 2013 21:10

LoyalRoyal22
SCIAG
LoyalRoyal22 At least Ian understands. Embarrassing lack of tactical knowledge on this forum. Was a diamond today for those that couldn't work it out.

For most of the match it was a flat 4-4-2 with McAnuff alongside Williams and Drenthe wide right.


Started as a diamond

Before the match Dellor said that Obita would be in the middle with Drenthe and McAnuff wide. Then early in the commentary he said it was a diamond with Drenthe at the forward point. A bit later - still in the first half, I think - he said Reading had switched to a flat 4-4-2.

Of course, I know that the original poster had the right idea and none of the above tells me what formation we were actually playing even if one of the statements happened to be right.

Another interesting piece of commentary was when he got incredibly excited about a Huddersfield chance "a few yards out at the back post", calmed down and said that the forward didn't quite get the contact he wanted. This was followed by saying that the ball went out for a Reading throw. I really cannot conceive any natural passage of play in which all of that happened.


AthleticoSpizz
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 25395
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 19:49
Location: A Hicks Hoof from Coley Park

Re: For those that don't understand formations (Tim dellor)

by AthleticoSpizz » 15 Dec 2013 21:12

:roll:

There is a place in broadcasting for you Ray

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 146 guests

It is currently 29 Jun 2025 18:33