by kwik-silva » 29 May 2014 08:34
by Nameless » 29 May 2014 09:23
RoyalBlue
As for wanting to ensure certain things do or don't happen post sale, I am pretty sure you can insert conditions in any contract for sale (within the bounds of reasonableness). However, how easy it would be to enforce such undertakings post sale is another matter.
by Nameless » 29 May 2014 09:25
UpThePremNameless The IPL is nothing like our league. Clubs sign players on very short term deals and are pretty much set up from scratch each season. There is no reason to think any further ahead than the current season. You would hope someone getting involved in football would have done a tiny bit of research....
If hes willing to bankroll that scenario, with his money and not lead to a huge debt for the club, I'd be more than happy to see 11/12 top quality players coming in on one year contracts and fly through the Championship. Whether they all gel or not will be the issue and we will be considered to be the new QPR but worse.
by Pepe the Horseman » 29 May 2014 09:27
by Nameless » 29 May 2014 09:30
Pepe the Horseman Isn't that essentially what Donny tried to do? Obvs not 'top quality', but biggish names on short term contracts.
by Uke » 29 May 2014 09:43
NamelessPepe the Horseman Isn't that essentially what Donny tried to do? Obvs not 'top quality', but biggish names on short term contracts.
Kind of. Biggish has beens happy to take the money and do very little.
by Norfolk Royal » 29 May 2014 09:45
by Silver Fox » 29 May 2014 09:53
St. Brynjar From what I've heard nothing will happen for quite a long time. Apparently Samuelson is being much more cooperative than is being made out here, it's SJM who is the problem. He won't give up the naming rights to the stadium, and is holding out for an actual fee when the TSI people are happy to take the quid and dash. Sagi's offer is preferred because A) he's richer and B) his offer is much less complicated despite the idea of a shopping center etc. since Burman's requires the rebranding of the club to Reading Royals within 5 years and to put all Cat 1 academy progress on hold. There's also a worry that he'll do an Anton.
This is all from a friend of Wood-Smith's, so take it with a pinch of salt. He's been wrong about things before!
by Royalwaster » 29 May 2014 10:00
Norfolk Royal This is quite a long board meeting. Have they sent out for sandwiches yet?
by Royalclapper » 29 May 2014 10:02
by Nameless » 29 May 2014 10:02
by RoyalBoy26 » 29 May 2014 10:10
by The Rouge » 29 May 2014 10:24
St. Brynjar From what I've heard nothing will happen for quite a long time. Apparently Samuelson is being much more cooperative than is being made out here, it's SJM who is the problem. He won't give up the naming rights to the stadium, and is holding out for an actual fee when the TSI people are happy to take the quid and dash.
by melonhead » 29 May 2014 10:25
RoyalBlueNameless Never easy to sort the wheat from the chaff !
I could imagine the respective buyers being asked to outline their plans for the club, but if the deal is for a 100% purchase then the buyers have no need to place conditions like these.
If SJM is making things difficult you have to hope it is just a negotiating stance, there is no reason I can see for him to kill every deal over minor things like the name of the stadium.
Granted 'If'
No reason you can see? Minor thing? I give you EGO!
.
by Royalwaster » 29 May 2014 10:48
by Royalcop » 29 May 2014 10:49
by Cape Town Royal » 29 May 2014 11:01
melonheadRoyalBlueNameless Never easy to sort the wheat from the chaff !
I could imagine the respective buyers being asked to outline their plans for the club, but if the deal is for a 100% purchase then the buyers have no need to place conditions like these.
If SJM is making things difficult you have to hope it is just a negotiating stance, there is no reason I can see for him to kill every deal over minor things like the name of the stadium.
Granted 'If'
No reason you can see? Minor thing? I give you EGO!
.
he can no longer afford an EGO
he can barely afford some lego
by melonhead » 29 May 2014 11:02
Royalcop Negotiations failing over naming issues puts me in mind of this Big Train sketch:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKPZCnrY2Ho
by Pepe the Horseman » 29 May 2014 11:02
by melonhead » 29 May 2014 11:03
Royalwaster Just renewed my ST today .... let's hope we can sort out the ownership soon.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 429 guests