Confimred new owners of Raeding Footbal Club

8685 posts
kwik-silva
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1909
Joined: 11 Feb 2008 07:26

Re: Buyout

by kwik-silva » 29 May 2014 08:34

I really don't think that's the way to run a football club, requires much more of a team mentality than cricket. Don't knock it 'til you've tried it though?

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Buyout

by Nameless » 29 May 2014 09:23

RoyalBlue
As for wanting to ensure certain things do or don't happen post sale, I am pretty sure you can insert conditions in any contract for sale (within the bounds of reasonableness). However, how easy it would be to enforce such undertakings post sale is another matter.


Of course a contract can say anything that both parties agree on, my point was that the BUYER has no need to make post sale conditions.

If we are talking TSI, then as long as the contract was legal of course they could have their 2 year consultancy.
Frankly none of us have any influence, none of us actually know what is on the table and it's not us making any decisions. In many ways I'd suggest everyone taking the summer off and come back in August when it will be all done and dusted and we'll know where we stand.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Buyout

by Nameless » 29 May 2014 09:25

UpThePrem
Nameless The IPL is nothing like our league. Clubs sign players on very short term deals and are pretty much set up from scratch each season. There is no reason to think any further ahead than the current season. You would hope someone getting involved in football would have done a tiny bit of research....


If hes willing to bankroll that scenario, with his money and not lead to a huge debt for the club, I'd be more than happy to see 11/12 top quality players coming in on one year contracts and fly through the Championship. Whether they all gel or not will be the issue and we will be considered to be the new QPR but worse.


Top quality players don't need to sign 1 year contracts. Or if they do you would pay huge amounts.
And of course there would be no guarantee it would work, I'd probably not even bother going to games if we went down that route, it would be horrible IMHO.

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 19020
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Buyout

by Pepe the Horseman » 29 May 2014 09:27

Isn't that essentially what Donny tried to do? Obvs not 'top quality', but biggish names on short term contracts.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Buyout

by Nameless » 29 May 2014 09:30

Pepe the Horseman Isn't that essentially what Donny tried to do? Obvs not 'top quality', but biggish names on short term contracts.


Kind of. Biggish has beens happy to take the money and do very little.


User avatar
Uke
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23860
Joined: 17 Apr 2004 16:24
Location: Слава Україні! Героям слава! @UkeRFC

Re: Buyout

by Uke » 29 May 2014 09:43

Nameless
Pepe the Horseman Isn't that essentially what Donny tried to do? Obvs not 'top quality', but biggish names on short term contracts.


Kind of. Biggish has beens happy to take the money and do very little.



Like Drenthe, but on a short term contract

Norfolk Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3557
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 16:07
Location: Carrot juice is the elixir of the Gods.

Re: Buyout

by Norfolk Royal » 29 May 2014 09:45

This is quite a long board meeting. Have they sent out for sandwiches yet?

User avatar
Silver Fox
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 26857
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:02
Location: From the Andes to the indies in my undies

Re: Buyout

by Silver Fox » 29 May 2014 09:53

St. Brynjar From what I've heard nothing will happen for quite a long time. Apparently Samuelson is being much more cooperative than is being made out here, it's SJM who is the problem. He won't give up the naming rights to the stadium, and is holding out for an actual fee when the TSI people are happy to take the quid and dash. Sagi's offer is preferred because A) he's richer and B) his offer is much less complicated despite the idea of a shopping center etc. since Burman's requires the rebranding of the club to Reading Royals within 5 years and to put all Cat 1 academy progress on hold. There's also a worry that he'll do an Anton.

This is all from a friend of Wood-Smith's, so take it with a pinch of salt. He's been wrong about things before!


Bollocks

As the football league have set a precedent re rebranding thta's absolute balls

Also, what does "he won't give up naming rights to the stadium" mean? The stadium is named after Madejski but that doesn't mea he has naming rights

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3726
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: Buyout

by Royalwaster » 29 May 2014 10:00

Norfolk Royal This is quite a long board meeting. Have they sent out for sandwiches yet?


They're waiting for a final decision by the Hobnob on who they want - can't believe no-one has initiated a poll yet!


User avatar
Royalclapper
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1047
Joined: 16 Jun 2011 16:53
Location: 'Soccertainment' OUT

Re: Buyout

by Royalclapper » 29 May 2014 10:02

There won't be a buyout/takeover until every last liquid asset has been converted into cash and squirreled away to some untraceable account somewhere in the name of someone. Then the club can be offered with all valuable assets having been already stripped.

Fit and proper person test :lol: Question - What does that consist of then? Answer - 20 press ups and a recital of the first verse of the National Anthem.

Nameless
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8851
Joined: 23 Aug 2013 12:25

Re: Buyout

by Nameless » 29 May 2014 10:02

Presumably he could insist on a covenant that meant the ground had to be called 'Madejski Stadium' for a period of 25 years or something, and that no other name could be added.

As I said earlier, there seems no reason why he would scupper a sale purely on that. Except amongst the raving conspiracy theorist community....

RoyalBoy26
Member
Posts: 10
Joined: 03 Sep 2013 10:18

Re: Buyout

by RoyalBoy26 » 29 May 2014 10:10

Is it ok to be a scared Royals fan now :shock:

User avatar
The Rouge
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2560
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:51
Location: Giving it the Double Djokovic

Re: Buyout

by The Rouge » 29 May 2014 10:24

St. Brynjar From what I've heard nothing will happen for quite a long time. Apparently Samuelson is being much more cooperative than is being made out here, it's SJM who is the problem. He won't give up the naming rights to the stadium, and is holding out for an actual fee when the TSI people are happy to take the quid and dash.


I would concur with this bit. My good source defienitley stated that thr Russians were being cooperative but Madejski wasn't - hence the Omani takeover fall through. I won't mention one of the ridiculous clauses he tried to put in there..


User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Buyout

by melonhead » 29 May 2014 10:25

RoyalBlue
Nameless Never easy to sort the wheat from the chaff !

I could imagine the respective buyers being asked to outline their plans for the club, but if the deal is for a 100% purchase then the buyers have no need to place conditions like these.

If SJM is making things difficult you have to hope it is just a negotiating stance, there is no reason I can see for him to kill every deal over minor things like the name of the stadium.


Granted 'If'

No reason you can see? Minor thing? I give you EGO!

.


he can no longer afford an EGO
he can barely afford some lego

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3726
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: Buyout

by Royalwaster » 29 May 2014 10:48

Just renewed my ST today .... let's hope we can sort out the ownership soon.

Royalcop
Member
Posts: 307
Joined: 02 Jan 2005 17:50
Location: Chilterns

Re: Buyout

by Royalcop » 29 May 2014 10:49

Negotiations failing over naming issues puts me in mind of this Big Train sketch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKPZCnrY2Ho

Cape Town Royal
Member
Posts: 361
Joined: 15 Feb 2012 18:29
Location: Eating ramen in Shibuya

Re: Buyout

by Cape Town Royal » 29 May 2014 11:01

melonhead
RoyalBlue
Nameless Never easy to sort the wheat from the chaff !

I could imagine the respective buyers being asked to outline their plans for the club, but if the deal is for a 100% purchase then the buyers have no need to place conditions like these.

If SJM is making things difficult you have to hope it is just a negotiating stance, there is no reason I can see for him to kill every deal over minor things like the name of the stadium.


Granted 'If'

No reason you can see? Minor thing? I give you EGO!

.


he can no longer afford an EGO
he can barely afford some lego


Have you seen the price of Lego?? Sticklebricks are a far more cost effective play route....

However, maybe we can do a cross marketing deal with Lego and build the stadium expansion out of blue white (and a few red) 2 x 4 pieces!!

If we get relegated we can put a few Lego men in those seats to make it look like there's more of a crowd!!

Also will expand our support base into English league loving Scandinavia... Lots of hot Danish hotties coming to the erbyskerbystad together with the backing of a highly successful brand, which leads to further Danish investment by Carlsberg.. so the beer improves in the stands... Sales of new 'horned' Reading FC hats and platted blonde wigs go through the roof...

Net result ----> Financial problems solved.... Fans happy due to better beer, football and eye quality of support + pre-season trips to Scandinavia, when the weather there is at its best!!

No wonder the Commercial Director got the bullet - Just did not have the vision!!

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Buyout

by melonhead » 29 May 2014 11:02

Royalcop Negotiations failing over naming issues puts me in mind of this Big Train sketch:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dKPZCnrY2Ho
:lol:

User avatar
Pepe the Horseman
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 19020
Joined: 23 Jun 2011 10:24
Location: Putting right what once went wrong

Re: Buyout

by Pepe the Horseman » 29 May 2014 11:02

Will people turn on JM if it turns out the reason we're still in the shit is because he doesn't want the name of the stadium to change?

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Buyout

by melonhead » 29 May 2014 11:03

Royalwaster Just renewed my ST today .... let's hope we can sort out the ownership soon.


not sure your 375 quid is really going to move things forward as you are imagining

8685 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], Majestic-12 [Bot] and 429 guests

It is currently 19 Jul 2025 03:38