Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

Yellowcoat
Member
Posts: 461
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 20:43

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Yellowcoat » 01 Jun 2014 00:16

How can they pay if there is not enough cash in the bank? It may have been a straight choice between paying the wages or the tax man. Given that many other clubs choose this route, until it catches up with them, why should it be surprising if we end up doing the same after RFC failed to get in the play offs or promotion?

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2918
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by tmesis » 01 Jun 2014 10:48

Maybe one day clubs will realise that if the choice is between paying the tax man and signing a new player, signing the new player isn't the option they should go for.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 22380
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Royal Rother » 01 Jun 2014 12:15

notloyalenuffroyal Surely there must be an accountant nobber!!!! or a Run my own business nobber. Help me understand this madness.

It's the monthly PAYE & NIC that is unpaid.

They know almost exactly how much it will be every month of the year ahead, but ran out of cash because (presumably) AZ / BZ have said no more funds available.

More likely they always knew it was likely to happen, because income is also very predictable, so were perfectly well aware that unless they gained promotion or had a takeover deal sorted prior to the end of the season, they would need to sell a player immediately after the end of the season.

The notion that this has just crept up on the club is entirely false, it would have been one of the 3 options outlined above, and, although it was always the least attractive, they would have known it was also the most likely and may well have had discussions with other clubs regarding the availability of players before the end of the season.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by ZacNaloen » 01 Jun 2014 12:33

Reckon this has happened every year except last year since we came down in 2008 and Madejski stopped putting money in.

The "mysterious" black hole which we all knew were running costs.

It's just been publicised because people are asking the question about finances.

Westwood52
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1083
Joined: 08 Oct 2010 16:46

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Westwood52 » 01 Jun 2014 16:59

notloyalenuffroyal Time for a stupid question.

Why didn't they pay the tax bill in the first place? I'm pretty sure the club have accountants. I'm pretty sure their job includes calculating tax, so why didn't they work it out and pay the darned thing?

Have the accountants been sacked, because surely they have not done their job or am I a real thicky and it is a lot more complicated than that (more than possible - could certainly never run a business - much easier to work in a job where they sort that tax nonsense out!!!)

Over to you clever people.

From thicky.


You tell the Client what tax to pay & when-what the Client does after that is up to them.


Norfolk Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3559
Joined: 30 Apr 2004 16:07
Location: Carrot juice is the elixir of the Gods.

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Norfolk Royal » 01 Jun 2014 19:51

Westwood52
notloyalenuffroyal Time for a stupid question.

Why didn't they pay the tax bill in the first place? I'm pretty sure the club have accountants. I'm pretty sure their job includes calculating tax, so why didn't they work it out and pay the darned thing?

Have the accountants been sacked, because surely they have not done their job or am I a real thicky and it is a lot more complicated than that (more than possible - could certainly never run a business - much easier to work in a job where they sort that tax nonsense out!!!)

Over to you clever people.

From thicky.


You tell the Client what tax to pay & when-what the Client does after that is up to them.


Exactly, the accountant calculates the figure and tells you how much is due to HMRC. If you can't pay it, you're f*cked.

notloyalenuffroyal
Member
Posts: 408
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 00:17
Location: Tewkesbury

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by notloyalenuffroyal » 01 Jun 2014 23:56

Thanks for the explanation people. It really is truly terrifying that clubs have been doing this, and even more terrifying that our "well run" club has been doing the same.

I am still a little surprised that there isn't a financial man at the top who says "No!" , but I suppose that is a Chairman's job. Here's another thicky question.... Do you pay tax on transfer fees?

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Ian Royal » 02 Jun 2014 00:47

notloyalenuffroyal Thanks for the explanation people. It really is truly terrifying that clubs have been doing this, and even more terrifying that our "well run" club has been doing the same.

I am still a little surprised that there isn't a financial man at the top who says "No!" , but I suppose that is a Chairman's job. Here's another thicky question.... Do you pay tax on transfer fees?

What would you do if you don't have enough money to pay the players and the tax man?

Pay the taxman to keep HMRC happy and risk player's crying breach of contract, putting in poor protest performances, or having the FL kick you out of the league / dock you points for not honouring football debts?

Or would you prefer to have HMRC put you through the debt recovery procedure?

It sucks, but that's the way it is. It's understandable when you have the rug pulled out from under you. Some clubs seem to use it as an actual business model though.

User avatar
Royal Lady
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 13769
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 10:17
Location: Don't mess with "my sort". Cheers then.

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Royal Lady » 02 Jun 2014 09:10

From some of our performances this season, I could have sworn the players were playing in protest!


User avatar
Maguire
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 12379
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:26

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Maguire » 02 Jun 2014 13:06

floyd__streete Remember, Reading fans, most of you welcomed TSI with open arms and entirely without question and many of you of course ridiculed the few who pointed out the dubious history of certain component members of TSI


I don't see the problem tbh - somebody else rich will buy the club, we've had an unlikely league title and year in the Premier League out of TSI, what was the other option? Plod through years of average Championship football under Sir John's ownership?

The world's not going to end.

User avatar
melonhead
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 14230
Joined: 30 Jul 2010 15:36
Location: on a thorn

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by melonhead » 02 Jun 2014 14:42

^ yeah that

User avatar
Green
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 29708
Joined: 29 Jun 2012 13:28

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by Green » 02 Jun 2014 15:31

Try telling that to fellow supporters who have seen their club go to the wall following takeovers by unscrupulous foreign businessmen.

Don't say it can't happen here because it nearly did once before.

User avatar
WAZZOCK
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 23:09

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by WAZZOCK » 02 Jun 2014 18:49

Royal Lady Wazzock - suitable name btw - we don't have any buyers - we have two potential buyers both of whom appear to be getting fed up with this dragging on - thanks, in no small part, to "TSI". It is clear we won't be buying in any players until the ownership is sorted. Personally, reaching the Prem last time was just a poisoned chalice - we spent money we couldn't afford, we were landed in further debt we couldn't afford and look at us now.....so, if I had been given the choice of spending one pretty dire year in the Prem and being in great debt or staying in the prem, still being a well-run club and TSI not being part of it, I would have chosen the latter - which was my original question. I know hindsight is a wonderful thing, but it wasn't difficult to predict that TSI (not to mention Samuelson) were going to bring problems rather than solve any. So, no, I'm not being dramatic - we are in deep shite at the moment and it doesn't look like being solved any time soon.


:lol:

God I love being right. The news made public today in conjunction with some further developments I was made aware of today that haven't yet come to light, means this whole thing will be resolved within the next fortnight. Relax.

Oh and FYI, you have neglected to acknowledge that on top of the player expenditure we spent quite a bit of the Prem money on our fantastic Academy Setup, which is already starting to reap the rewards.


multisync1830
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1648
Joined: 02 Nov 2012 15:55

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by multisync1830 » 02 Jun 2014 19:08

WAZZOCK
Royal Lady Wazzock - suitable name btw - we don't have any buyers - we have two potential buyers both of whom appear to be getting fed up with this dragging on - thanks, in no small part, to "TSI". It is clear we won't be buying in any players until the ownership is sorted. Personally, reaching the Prem last time was just a poisoned chalice - we spent money we couldn't afford, we were landed in further debt we couldn't afford and look at us now.....so, if I had been given the choice of spending one pretty dire year in the Prem and being in great debt or staying in the prem, still being a well-run club and TSI not being part of it, I would have chosen the latter - which was my original question. I know hindsight is a wonderful thing, but it wasn't difficult to predict that TSI (not to mention Samuelson) were going to bring problems rather than solve any. So, no, I'm not being dramatic - we are in deep shite at the moment and it doesn't look like being solved any time soon.


:lol:

God I love being right. The news made public today in conjunction with some further developments I was made aware of today that haven't yet come to light, means this whole thing will be resolved within the next fortnight. Relax.

Oh and FYI, you have neglected to acknowledge that on top of the player expenditure we spent quite a bit of the Prem money on our fantastic Academy Setup, which is already starting to reap the rewards.


care to clear up the current share ownership situation. That would be most welcome

User avatar
WAZZOCK
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 23:09

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by WAZZOCK » 02 Jun 2014 19:32

All I'd say is, just relax.

multisync1830
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1648
Joined: 02 Nov 2012 15:55

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by multisync1830 » 02 Jun 2014 19:39

WAZZOCK All I'd say is, just relax.


The trouble is when you try to be all knowing, high and mighty it can come back and bite you on the arse



Postby WAZZOCK » 11 Nov 2013 21:24

One of my good friends has quite a senior position at the club, and they have told me there is absolutely nothing to worry about. In fact they reckon that as a business, it is being run better than ever with new people in charge, and there are some exciting plans afoot for the club. Not being one to lie, I trust their judgement.

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by ZacNaloen » 02 Jun 2014 21:37

It would still be true if Anton hadn't of had his pocket money taken away.

User avatar
WAZZOCK
Member
Posts: 737
Joined: 11 Apr 2006 23:09

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by WAZZOCK » 02 Jun 2014 21:41

Fact!

User avatar
ZacNaloen
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7239
Joined: 13 Oct 2008 13:34
Location: 'If atheism is a religion, then bald is a hair color.' -Mark Schnitzius

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by ZacNaloen » 03 Jun 2014 11:55

8)

multisync1830
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1648
Joined: 02 Nov 2012 15:55

Re: Tax doesn't need to be taxing.....

by multisync1830 » 03 Jun 2014 12:12

ZacNaloen It would still be true if Anton hadn't of had his pocket money taken away.


Are you saying the debt didn't increase during last year?

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 112 guests

It is currently 22 Aug 2025 20:27