by Mr Angry » 09 Apr 2015 14:29
by YateleyRoyal » 09 Apr 2015 15:11
by TBM » 09 Apr 2015 16:10
YateleyRoyal Have they made special allowances because it’s a tournament I wonder?
I would guess it’s because it wasn’t a judgement call, like an offside decision, but rather a clearly incorrect enforcement of the rules.
You also have to wonder if they’d do the same if it was a consolation goal, rather than one which will likely result in points.
by 6ft Kerplunk » 09 Apr 2015 16:34
TBM I never understand the "encroaching" rule.....surely if you're scored the penalty then why should it mater if a player has stepped into the box before its kicked? Yeah if its saved and rebounded out but not this.....
by John Madejski's Wallet » 09 Apr 2015 16:43
by Stranded » 09 Apr 2015 19:31
YateleyRoyal Have they made special allowances because it’s a tournament I wonder?
I would guess it’s because it wasn’t a judgement call, like an offside decision, but rather a clearly incorrect enforcement of the rules.
You also have to wonder if they’d do the same if it was a consolation goal, rather than one which will likely result in points.
by AthleticoSpizz » 09 Apr 2015 19:43
by multisync1830 » 09 Apr 2015 21:24
Mr Angry
Who says Women's football isn't entertaining?
by Mr Optimist » 09 Apr 2015 21:41
multisync1830Mr Angry
Who says Women's football isn't entertaining?
me. It's shit big time.
by Winston Smith » 09 Apr 2015 21:42
by AthleticoSpizz » 10 Apr 2015 00:26
Arsenals Leah Williamson scores the penalty tonight that sees England go top.AthleticoSpizz I think it's great.
And rightly opens up the whole possibility of being able to change results retrospectively.
To err is to be human, to error as a referee is to get the whole football community talking....and get the sack
by Nameless » 10 Apr 2015 18:16
by Stranded » 10 Apr 2015 21:34
Nameless I wonder what they would have done if the penalty had been in the first minute of the game and England had ended the game 2-0 down?
Same error, and you could argue a totally different game had an early goal been scored.
Really dangerous decision, stand by for huge numbers of Chelsea managers demanding games be replayed due to thrown ins being awarded the wrong way....
by Flyingkiwi » 12 Apr 2015 04:10
Mr Optimistmultisync1830Mr Angry
Who says Women's football isn't entertaining?
me. It's shit big time.
Amen brother. BBC can fack off with their crusade for wimmins football. It is a minority sport and should be treated as such. If they are going to give it airtime then they should give equal coverage to angling, ice hockey, speedway, sailing, crown bowling, ten pin bowling, tiddliewinks, squash, and facking badminton.
by Sutekh » 12 Apr 2015 08:33
by Ouroboros » 13 Apr 2015 07:34
John Madejski's Wallet Yet you can stand offside and distract a keeper all you want from a free kick, without "interfering with play". Never understood why its a special circumstance for pens
by John Madejski's Wallet » 13 Apr 2015 11:01
OuroborosJohn Madejski's Wallet Yet you can stand offside and distract a keeper all you want from a free kick, without "interfering with play". Never understood why its a special circumstance for pens
Surely wrt pens the issue is not so much distracting the keeper as gaining an unfair advantage over the defending side if the pen is saved and rebounds into the box.
by sandman » 13 Apr 2015 13:41
by Sanguine » 22 Apr 2015 09:22
by TBM » 22 Apr 2015 09:55
Sanguine In similar scenes - an Inverness player has been banned from the Scottish Cup final retrospectively for handball, following controversy in the semi-final vs. Celtic, who were denied a clear penalty.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/32402364
Retrospective punishments for violent play are one thing, but going back and correcting refereeing mistakes? Do I not like that.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 79 guests