Law Changes

User avatar
Handsome Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3326
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 08:21
Location: Practically Rock Paper Scissors Champion of the World

Re: Law Changes

by Handsome Man » 18 Apr 2016 09:35

Tony Le Mesmer Dislike 3, but agree with the principal of 4.

The current triple punishment is wrong. I'd like to see a pen and yellow given in all cases, except where a certain goal is denied (eg deliberate hand ball on the line). The award of a penalty is adv the attacking team in almost all circumstances apart from that.


The professional foul rule has been a good one, well implemented, and I don't see why they would want to mess with it. It's not a triple punishment, as the penalty is simply providing an equivalent goal-scoring opportunity.

The unfairness in Darren Fletcher being banned for a Champions League final arose over a tough decision over a foul, not because of any laws concerning red cards.

Sanguine
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 27924
Joined: 27 Feb 2013 14:36

Re: Law Changes

by Sanguine » 18 Apr 2016 09:48

As the article states, 3 is not the broad removal of the rule that players must leave the field after treatment. Players will be allowed to remain on the field if they require treatment after a yellow or red card foul only. It's a good middle ground.

Tony Le Mesmer
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3404
Joined: 17 Jun 2005 20:37
Location: Dundee in my bare feet

Re: Law Changes

by Tony Le Mesmer » 18 Apr 2016 10:25

Handsome Man
Tony Le Mesmer Dislike 3, but agree with the principal of 4.

The current triple punishment is wrong. I'd like to see a pen and yellow given in all cases, except where a certain goal is denied (eg deliberate hand ball on the line). The award of a penalty is adv the attacking team in almost all circumstances apart from that.


The professional foul rule has been a good one, well implemented, and I don't see why they would want to mess with it. It's not a triple punishment, as the penalty is simply providing an equivalent goal-scoring opportunity.

The unfairness in Darren Fletcher being banned for a Champions League final arose over a tough decision over a foul, not because of any laws concerning red cards.


Penalty
Red Card
Suspension

Triple Punishment

User avatar
Handsome Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3326
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 08:21
Location: Practically Rock Paper Scissors Champion of the World

Re: Law Changes

by Handsome Man » 18 Apr 2016 12:21

Tony Le Mesmer
Handsome Man
Tony Le Mesmer Dislike 3, but agree with the principal of 4.

The current triple punishment is wrong. I'd like to see a pen and yellow given in all cases, except where a certain goal is denied (eg deliberate hand ball on the line). The award of a penalty is adv the attacking team in almost all circumstances apart from that.


The professional foul rule has been a good one, well implemented, and I don't see why they would want to mess with it. It's not a triple punishment, as the penalty is simply providing an equivalent goal-scoring opportunity.

The unfairness in Darren Fletcher being banned for a Champions League final arose over a tough decision over a foul, not because of any laws concerning red cards.


Penalty
Red Card
Suspension

Triple Punishment


Double punishment as the penalty simply replaces one goal-scoring opportunity with another.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Law Changes

by Platypuss » 18 Apr 2016 12:34

One compensation and two punishments.


User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8909
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: Law Changes

by stealthpapes » 18 Apr 2016 14:43

Tony Le Mesmer Dislike 3, but agree with the principal of 4.

The current triple punishment is wrong. I'd like to see a pen and yellow given in all cases, except where a certain goal is denied (eg deliberate hand ball on the line). The award of a penalty is adv the attacking team in almost all circumstances apart from that.


Double/triple punishment

I think *all* fouls are effectively doubly punished. The player, for the severity of his foul, and the team, for where the foul took place.

The only issue is that some referees give a red when a yellow would probably have done - i.e clumsy rather than cynical in the area, anything involving a one-on-one not directly in line with goal.

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8909
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: Law Changes

by stealthpapes » 18 Apr 2016 14:48

Oh, the triple is the suspension?

Same point, with the punishment for both. But again, mitigated by more sensible refereeing and not overdoing the 3 match ban.

It's the same principle with every foul.

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: Law Changes

by Royal With Cheese » 18 Apr 2016 17:52

1. Penalty goal for handball in the box and yellow card for the offender.

2. Trainers can come on during the game.

3. Removal of every slow motion camera from every ground and the banning of the instant replay.

4. All players shorts the size of barrage balloons and the re-introduction of pigs bladders as balls.

User avatar
tmesis
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2918
Joined: 16 Aug 2013 20:26

Re: Law Changes

by tmesis » 18 Apr 2016 21:14

Tony Le Mesmer
Penalty
Red Card
Suspension

Triple Punishment

It's only a triple if it's inside the box though. For professional fouls, I've no problem with the triple punishment.

I do, however, agree with not giving a red card for those "fouls" where an attacker just runs alongside the defender and goes down claiming "contact". Mind you, I'd rather the change there is that they didn't give a foul at all, unless they genuinely feel that the defender's contact caused the player to fall.


User avatar
Handsome Man
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3326
Joined: 04 Apr 2006 08:21
Location: Practically Rock Paper Scissors Champion of the World

Re: Law Changes

by Handsome Man » 19 Apr 2016 08:30

tmesis
Tony Le Mesmer
Penalty
Red Card
Suspension

Triple Punishment

It's only a triple if it's inside the box though. For professional fouls, I've no problem with the triple punishment.

I do, however, agree with not giving a red card for those "fouls" where an attacker just runs alongside the defender and goes down claiming "contact". Mind you, I'd rather the change there is that they didn't give a foul at all, unless they genuinely feel that the defender's contact caused the player to fall.


I think this is right. The issue causing problems at the moment is not so much what cards are given, but what constitutes a foul, and it is that which needs clarifying. There are pundits who see contact as a justification for any penalty, but Howard Webb certainly doesn't seem to give that impression on the BT live games. This needs sorting out before TV replays can be used.

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9592
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: Law Changes

by Forbury Lion » 19 Apr 2016 11:42

Deadlock How often would 2 happen?
Punch up in the tunnel before the game, 6 players sent off from Neil Warnock's side and the match is abandoned before it even starts..... it later turns out that all 3 of their goalkeepers were injured falling out of the coach and the manager saw this as a way to get the match postponed until they were fit again.

Sutekh
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 23130
Joined: 12 Feb 2014 14:05
Location: Over the hills and far away

Re: Law Changes

by Sutekh » 19 Apr 2016 12:21

Forbury Lion
Deadlock How often would 2 happen?
Punch up in the tunnel before the game, 6 players sent off from Neil Warnock's side and the match is abandoned before it even starts..... it later turns out that all 3 of their goalkeepers were injured falling out of the coach and the manager saw this as a way to get the match postponed until they were fit again.


Imagine that. You're sat in the stand having seen the warm up and settling down to avoid another afternoon round the shops with your other half only to be told just before the teams run out that there has "been an occurrence" and therefore the match has to be abandoned because one team doesn't have enough players left.

Forbury Lion
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 9592
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 08:37
Location: https://youtu.be/c4sX57ZUhzc

Re: Law Changes

by Forbury Lion » 19 Apr 2016 13:06

Sutekh
Forbury Lion
Deadlock How often would 2 happen?
Punch up in the tunnel before the game, 6 players sent off from Neil Warnock's side and the match is abandoned before it even starts..... it later turns out that all 3 of their goalkeepers were injured falling out of the coach and the manager saw this as a way to get the match postponed until they were fit again.


Imagine that. You're sat in the stand having seen the warm up and settling down to avoid another afternoon round the shops with your other half only to be told just before the teams run out that there has "been an occurrence" and therefore the match has to be abandoned because one team doesn't have enough players left.
I imagine the PA announcer will deliver it in his usual energetic style and finish the sentence off with something about the legendary atmosphere..... probably leave it until the last minute too so that hotdog and beer sales pre-match are maximised.


User avatar
Winston Smith
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5219
Joined: 06 Aug 2014 16:09
Location: Ministry of Truth

Re: Law Changes

by Winston Smith » 02 Jun 2016 08:41

they are having a play around with some laws in the Copa America to see how they work out

4th substitute allowed if the game goes into extra time

Video replay assistant at the side who the ref can ask for help from

Penalty to be awarded for abusive language towards an official

User avatar
Deadlock
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2979
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:07
Location: There's nothing of value there and the people make very poor slaves.

Re: Law Changes

by Deadlock » 02 Jun 2016 10:46

Winston Smith Penalty to be awarded for abusive language towards an official

Anywhere on the pitch, or just in the area?

User avatar
Winston Smith
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5219
Joined: 06 Aug 2014 16:09
Location: Ministry of Truth

Re: Law Changes

by Winston Smith » 02 Jun 2016 10:49

Deadlock
Winston Smith Penalty to be awarded for abusive language towards an official

Anywhere on the pitch, or just in the area?


anywhere I believe.

User avatar
stealthpapes
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8909
Joined: 05 Jun 2013 13:25
Location: proverbs 26:11

Re: Law Changes

by stealthpapes » 02 Jun 2016 15:02

hijo de puta

User avatar
Huckleberry Hound
Member
Posts: 139
Joined: 16 Oct 2011 18:04
Location: The Magic Roundabout

Re: Law Changes

by Huckleberry Hound » 17 Jun 2016 13:06

Sanguine As the article states, 3 is not the broad removal of the rule that players must leave the field after treatment. Players will be allowed to remain on the field if they require treatment after a yellow or red card foul only. It's a good middle ground.


Expect to see more imaginary card waving as the players catch on to this.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 67 guests

It is currently 21 Aug 2025 12:05