by Snowflake Royal »
11 May 2022 08:18
SCIAG Not sure I buy the obsession with "pace" for a centre back. Remember the Duberry-Ivar partnership that got us to 4th? Or the Pearce-Gorkss partnership that got us promoted?
Reminds me a bit of how in the period between Kitson leaving and Roberts joining, a regular talking point was that we should pick Mooney/Brett Williams/Sheppard/Manset because they were "big".
In the right system it doesn't matter much if your centre backs are "slow", as long as they make up for it with good positioning. Give me a partnership of Dann and McIntyre who can both read a game ahead of one of them with a mediocre League One defender who can run quickly.
Pace affects where you can hold your defensive line. Lack of it means you have to hold it deeper, or be exposed in behind and to being run at from turnovers.
Deeper means your whole team has to sit deeper or leave a bigger gap between midfield and defence which can be exploited. If midfield sits deeper it's less able to progress forward in possession and support attack.
Time and again last season Morrison, Holmes, McIntyre and Dann's lack of pace was exposed in those scenarios.
Ivar wasn't quick, but he was quicker than most of them. Him and Duberry were better than them. As was Gorkss, at least.
It's not so much that we need someone quick, as we need someone not glacially slow like them.
On top of that, full backs play further forward these days leaving the flanks more exposed with CBs having to cover more ground. And CBs often get pulled higher and split further in possession because of stupid attempts to make them playmakers, meaning they're less able to support each other or get back without greater pace.
It isn't pace for the sake of pace, it's resolving a glaring weakness in the side that is being regularly exploited and costing us.