by SPARTA » 09 May 2013 09:16
by Cobi » 09 May 2013 10:43
by Alexander Litvinenko » 09 May 2013 10:46
by St. Brynjar » 09 May 2013 11:50
by Barry the bird boggler » 09 May 2013 12:07
by Divvy » 09 May 2013 12:42
by Stuka » 09 May 2013 13:31
by Pandoras Box » 09 May 2013 13:56
by Alexander Litvinenko » 09 May 2013 16:43
No Fixed Abode Microsoft pulled the plug due to relegation, so Reading took the 2nd best offer on the table.
by Jackson Corner » 09 May 2013 16:59
by maffff » 09 May 2013 18:25
by St. Brynjar » 09 May 2013 19:41
No Fixed Abode Microsoft pulled the plug due to relegation, so Reading took the 2nd best offer on the table.
by ZacNaloen » 09 May 2013 19:49
by St. Brynjar » 09 May 2013 19:52
ZacNaloen Would most likely have been the Xbox branding on the shirt (if true) rather than microsoft anyway, and that would have been ugly and a bit shit.
No issues with Waitrose.
by SPARTA » 09 May 2013 19:54
St. BrynjarNo Fixed Abode Microsoft pulled the plug due to relegation, so Reading took the 2nd best offer on the table.
If that's the case then Reading took the best offer on the table.
by Divvy » 09 May 2013 19:58
SPARTASt. BrynjarNo Fixed Abode Microsoft pulled the plug due to relegation, so Reading took the 2nd best offer on the table.
If that's the case then Reading took the best offer on the table.
That isn't the case. You'll soon learn NFA is a wind-up merchant.
by SLAMMED » 09 May 2013 22:49
St. BrynjarZacNaloen Would most likely have been the Xbox branding on the shirt (if true) rather than microsoft anyway, and that would have been ugly and a bit shit.
No issues with Waitrose.
Good point. And any of these wouldn't have been great on a football shirt:
by Alexander Litvinenko » 10 May 2013 10:21
ZacNaloen Would most likely have been the Xbox branding on the shirt (if true) rather than microsoft anyway, and that would have been ugly and a bit shit.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 148 guests